Cargando…

Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries

Although climate change is altering the productivity and distribution of marine fisheries, climate-adaptive fisheries management could mitigate many of the negative impacts on human society. We forecast global fisheries biomass, catch, and profits to 2100 under three climate scenarios (RCPs 4.5, 6.0...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Free, Christopher M., Mangin, Tracey, Molinos, Jorge García, Ojea, Elena, Burden, Merrick, Costello, Christopher, Gaines, Steven D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32134926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347
_version_ 1783503841083260928
author Free, Christopher M.
Mangin, Tracey
Molinos, Jorge García
Ojea, Elena
Burden, Merrick
Costello, Christopher
Gaines, Steven D.
author_facet Free, Christopher M.
Mangin, Tracey
Molinos, Jorge García
Ojea, Elena
Burden, Merrick
Costello, Christopher
Gaines, Steven D.
author_sort Free, Christopher M.
collection PubMed
description Although climate change is altering the productivity and distribution of marine fisheries, climate-adaptive fisheries management could mitigate many of the negative impacts on human society. We forecast global fisheries biomass, catch, and profits to 2100 under three climate scenarios (RCPs 4.5, 6.0, 8.5) and five levels of management reform to (1) determine the impact of climate change on national fisheries and (2) quantify the national-scale benefits of implementing climate-adaptive fisheries reforms. Management reforms accounting for shifting productivity and shifting distributions would yield higher catch and profits in the future relative to today for 60–65% of countries under the two least severe climate scenarios but for only 35% of countries under the most severe scenario. Furthermore, these management reforms would yield higher cumulative catch and profits than business-as-usual management for nearly all countries under the two least severe climate scenarios but would yield lower cumulative catch for 40% of countries under the most severe scenario. Fortunately, perfect fisheries management is not necessary to achieve these benefits: transboundary cooperation with 5-year intervals between adaptive interventions would result in comparable outcomes. However, the ability for realistic management reforms to offset the negative impacts of climate change is bounded by changes in underlying biological productivity. Although realistic reforms could generate higher catch and profits for 23–50% of countries experiencing reductions in productivity, the remaining countries would need to develop, expand, and reform aquaculture and other food production sectors to offset losses in capture fisheries. Still, climate-adaptive management is more profitable than business-as-usual management in all countries and we provide guidance on implementing–and achieving the benefits of–climate-adaptive fisheries reform along a gradient of scientific, management, and enforcement capacities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7058327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70583272020-03-12 Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries Free, Christopher M. Mangin, Tracey Molinos, Jorge García Ojea, Elena Burden, Merrick Costello, Christopher Gaines, Steven D. PLoS One Research Article Although climate change is altering the productivity and distribution of marine fisheries, climate-adaptive fisheries management could mitigate many of the negative impacts on human society. We forecast global fisheries biomass, catch, and profits to 2100 under three climate scenarios (RCPs 4.5, 6.0, 8.5) and five levels of management reform to (1) determine the impact of climate change on national fisheries and (2) quantify the national-scale benefits of implementing climate-adaptive fisheries reforms. Management reforms accounting for shifting productivity and shifting distributions would yield higher catch and profits in the future relative to today for 60–65% of countries under the two least severe climate scenarios but for only 35% of countries under the most severe scenario. Furthermore, these management reforms would yield higher cumulative catch and profits than business-as-usual management for nearly all countries under the two least severe climate scenarios but would yield lower cumulative catch for 40% of countries under the most severe scenario. Fortunately, perfect fisheries management is not necessary to achieve these benefits: transboundary cooperation with 5-year intervals between adaptive interventions would result in comparable outcomes. However, the ability for realistic management reforms to offset the negative impacts of climate change is bounded by changes in underlying biological productivity. Although realistic reforms could generate higher catch and profits for 23–50% of countries experiencing reductions in productivity, the remaining countries would need to develop, expand, and reform aquaculture and other food production sectors to offset losses in capture fisheries. Still, climate-adaptive management is more profitable than business-as-usual management in all countries and we provide guidance on implementing–and achieving the benefits of–climate-adaptive fisheries reform along a gradient of scientific, management, and enforcement capacities. Public Library of Science 2020-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7058327/ /pubmed/32134926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347 Text en © 2020 Free et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Free, Christopher M.
Mangin, Tracey
Molinos, Jorge García
Ojea, Elena
Burden, Merrick
Costello, Christopher
Gaines, Steven D.
Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries
title Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries
title_full Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries
title_fullStr Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries
title_full_unstemmed Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries
title_short Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries
title_sort realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32134926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347
work_keys_str_mv AT freechristopherm realisticfisheriesmanagementreformscouldmitigatetheimpactsofclimatechangeinmostcountries
AT mangintracey realisticfisheriesmanagementreformscouldmitigatetheimpactsofclimatechangeinmostcountries
AT molinosjorgegarcia realisticfisheriesmanagementreformscouldmitigatetheimpactsofclimatechangeinmostcountries
AT ojeaelena realisticfisheriesmanagementreformscouldmitigatetheimpactsofclimatechangeinmostcountries
AT burdenmerrick realisticfisheriesmanagementreformscouldmitigatetheimpactsofclimatechangeinmostcountries
AT costellochristopher realisticfisheriesmanagementreformscouldmitigatetheimpactsofclimatechangeinmostcountries
AT gainesstevend realisticfisheriesmanagementreformscouldmitigatetheimpactsofclimatechangeinmostcountries