Cargando…

Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection

Despite evidence of both human and animal Leptospira exposures in Uganda, the epidemiology of the disease is still not well-investigated. Contact with animals and their environments have been pointed out as potential source of infection with Leptospira species in humans; and cattle may be an importa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alinaitwe, Lordrick, Kankya, Clovice, Namanya, Dianah, Pithua, Patrick, Dreyfus, Anou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00106
_version_ 1783503875564634112
author Alinaitwe, Lordrick
Kankya, Clovice
Namanya, Dianah
Pithua, Patrick
Dreyfus, Anou
author_facet Alinaitwe, Lordrick
Kankya, Clovice
Namanya, Dianah
Pithua, Patrick
Dreyfus, Anou
author_sort Alinaitwe, Lordrick
collection PubMed
description Despite evidence of both human and animal Leptospira exposures in Uganda, the epidemiology of the disease is still not well-investigated. Contact with animals and their environments have been pointed out as potential source of infection with Leptospira species in humans; and cattle may be an important reservoir in Uganda. In this cross-sectional study, we estimated the prevalence of anti-Leptospira antibodies by the standard microscopic agglutination test (MAT); and associated risk factors among slaughtered cattle. We also compared the performance of the MAT used in this study against a lipL32 based real time PCR (qPCR) assay previously conducted on the kidneys and urine of the same slaughter cattle as tested in this reported study. Of 500 cattle sampled, 27.8% (95% CI 23.9–32.0) tested positive (titer ≥ 100) to at least one Leptospira serovar, with the majority of seropositive cattle reacting to serovars Tarassovi (sg Tarassovi) (11.6%), Sejroe (Sg Sejroe) (7.8%), and Australis (Sg Australis) (5.2%). Older animals had 2.8 times (95% CI 1.0–8.2, p-value 0.055) greater odds of being seropositive than younger ones (<1.5 years). The sensitivity and specificity of the MAT over the qPCR were 65.9% (95% CI 50.1–79.5) and 75.9% (95% CI 71.7–79.7), respectively; with a negative predictive value of 95.8% and positive predictive value of 20.9%. In conclusion, slaughter cattle in this study were significantly exposed to pathogenic Leptospira species of mainly the Tarassovi, Sejroe, and Australis serogroups, with seroprevalence being higher among older cattle. The high specificity and negative predictive value of MAT as used in this study when compared to the qPCR assay may imply a rather strong association between seronegativity and absence of renal Leptospira infection. However, MAT predictability for renal Leptospira infection may be interpreted cautiously since predictive values of diagnostic tests are dependent on prevalence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7058543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70585432020-03-17 Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection Alinaitwe, Lordrick Kankya, Clovice Namanya, Dianah Pithua, Patrick Dreyfus, Anou Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Despite evidence of both human and animal Leptospira exposures in Uganda, the epidemiology of the disease is still not well-investigated. Contact with animals and their environments have been pointed out as potential source of infection with Leptospira species in humans; and cattle may be an important reservoir in Uganda. In this cross-sectional study, we estimated the prevalence of anti-Leptospira antibodies by the standard microscopic agglutination test (MAT); and associated risk factors among slaughtered cattle. We also compared the performance of the MAT used in this study against a lipL32 based real time PCR (qPCR) assay previously conducted on the kidneys and urine of the same slaughter cattle as tested in this reported study. Of 500 cattle sampled, 27.8% (95% CI 23.9–32.0) tested positive (titer ≥ 100) to at least one Leptospira serovar, with the majority of seropositive cattle reacting to serovars Tarassovi (sg Tarassovi) (11.6%), Sejroe (Sg Sejroe) (7.8%), and Australis (Sg Australis) (5.2%). Older animals had 2.8 times (95% CI 1.0–8.2, p-value 0.055) greater odds of being seropositive than younger ones (<1.5 years). The sensitivity and specificity of the MAT over the qPCR were 65.9% (95% CI 50.1–79.5) and 75.9% (95% CI 71.7–79.7), respectively; with a negative predictive value of 95.8% and positive predictive value of 20.9%. In conclusion, slaughter cattle in this study were significantly exposed to pathogenic Leptospira species of mainly the Tarassovi, Sejroe, and Australis serogroups, with seroprevalence being higher among older cattle. The high specificity and negative predictive value of MAT as used in this study when compared to the qPCR assay may imply a rather strong association between seronegativity and absence of renal Leptospira infection. However, MAT predictability for renal Leptospira infection may be interpreted cautiously since predictive values of diagnostic tests are dependent on prevalence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7058543/ /pubmed/32185188 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00106 Text en Copyright © 2020 Alinaitwe, Kankya, Namanya, Pithua and Dreyfus. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Alinaitwe, Lordrick
Kankya, Clovice
Namanya, Dianah
Pithua, Patrick
Dreyfus, Anou
Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection
title Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection
title_full Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection
title_fullStr Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection
title_full_unstemmed Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection
title_short Leptospira Seroprevalence Among Ugandan Slaughter Cattle: Comparison of Sero-Status With Renal Leptospira Infection
title_sort leptospira seroprevalence among ugandan slaughter cattle: comparison of sero-status with renal leptospira infection
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185188
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00106
work_keys_str_mv AT alinaitwelordrick leptospiraseroprevalenceamongugandanslaughtercattlecomparisonofserostatuswithrenalleptospirainfection
AT kankyaclovice leptospiraseroprevalenceamongugandanslaughtercattlecomparisonofserostatuswithrenalleptospirainfection
AT namanyadianah leptospiraseroprevalenceamongugandanslaughtercattlecomparisonofserostatuswithrenalleptospirainfection
AT pithuapatrick leptospiraseroprevalenceamongugandanslaughtercattlecomparisonofserostatuswithrenalleptospirainfection
AT dreyfusanou leptospiraseroprevalenceamongugandanslaughtercattlecomparisonofserostatuswithrenalleptospirainfection