Cargando…
Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016
Since 2015, the number of hepatitis B virus (HBV) cases increased substantially in Germany. In 2015, a more sensitive HBV case definition was introduced. This coincided with an asylum seeker influx with differing screening strategies. Information on the asylum seeker status has been collected since...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32089143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820000242 |
_version_ | 1783503899354726400 |
---|---|
author | von Laer, A. Diercke, M. an der Heiden, M. Altmann, D. Zimmermann, R. Dudareva, S. |
author_facet | von Laer, A. Diercke, M. an der Heiden, M. Altmann, D. Zimmermann, R. Dudareva, S. |
author_sort | von Laer, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since 2015, the number of hepatitis B virus (HBV) cases increased substantially in Germany. In 2015, a more sensitive HBV case definition was introduced. This coincided with an asylum seeker influx with differing screening strategies. Information on the asylum seeker status has been collected since 09/2015. We investigated this increase to interpret HBV notification data in Germany. We compared HBV surveillance data from 2010–2013 (baseline) with 2015–2016, excluding 2014 due to beginning of asylum seeker influx. We estimated the excess above the mean case number (baseline) using Poisson regression and compared asylum seeker cases and the excess of cases with the unknown asylum seeker status. HBV cases increased from 1855 (mean baseline) to 3873 (2015) and 3466 (2016) with 1903 asylum seeker cases and 1099 excess-cases with the unknown asylum seeker status in 2015–2016. Cases only fulfilling the changed case definition increased from 60% (1119) in baseline to 81% (P < 0.01) in 2015–2016; 69% of asylum seeker cases and 61% of excess-cases were males <40 years compared to 27% (baseline) (P < 0.01). Changed case definition increased the number of cases in official statistics substantially. Demographic and geographical distributions suggest that screening of asylum seekers increased the case numbers even to a higher extent than surveillance data indicates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7058648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70586482020-03-16 Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016 von Laer, A. Diercke, M. an der Heiden, M. Altmann, D. Zimmermann, R. Dudareva, S. Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Since 2015, the number of hepatitis B virus (HBV) cases increased substantially in Germany. In 2015, a more sensitive HBV case definition was introduced. This coincided with an asylum seeker influx with differing screening strategies. Information on the asylum seeker status has been collected since 09/2015. We investigated this increase to interpret HBV notification data in Germany. We compared HBV surveillance data from 2010–2013 (baseline) with 2015–2016, excluding 2014 due to beginning of asylum seeker influx. We estimated the excess above the mean case number (baseline) using Poisson regression and compared asylum seeker cases and the excess of cases with the unknown asylum seeker status. HBV cases increased from 1855 (mean baseline) to 3873 (2015) and 3466 (2016) with 1903 asylum seeker cases and 1099 excess-cases with the unknown asylum seeker status in 2015–2016. Cases only fulfilling the changed case definition increased from 60% (1119) in baseline to 81% (P < 0.01) in 2015–2016; 69% of asylum seeker cases and 61% of excess-cases were males <40 years compared to 27% (baseline) (P < 0.01). Changed case definition increased the number of cases in official statistics substantially. Demographic and geographical distributions suggest that screening of asylum seekers increased the case numbers even to a higher extent than surveillance data indicates. Cambridge University Press 2020-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7058648/ /pubmed/32089143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820000242 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper von Laer, A. Diercke, M. an der Heiden, M. Altmann, D. Zimmermann, R. Dudareva, S. Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016 |
title | Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016 |
title_full | Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016 |
title_fullStr | Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016 |
title_short | Implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis B surveillance in Germany in 2015 and 2016 |
title_sort | implications of a change in case definition and screening of asylum seekers for hepatitis b surveillance in germany in 2015 and 2016 |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32089143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820000242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vonlaera implicationsofachangeincasedefinitionandscreeningofasylumseekersforhepatitisbsurveillanceingermanyin2015and2016 AT dierckem implicationsofachangeincasedefinitionandscreeningofasylumseekersforhepatitisbsurveillanceingermanyin2015and2016 AT anderheidenm implicationsofachangeincasedefinitionandscreeningofasylumseekersforhepatitisbsurveillanceingermanyin2015and2016 AT altmannd implicationsofachangeincasedefinitionandscreeningofasylumseekersforhepatitisbsurveillanceingermanyin2015and2016 AT zimmermannr implicationsofachangeincasedefinitionandscreeningofasylumseekersforhepatitisbsurveillanceingermanyin2015and2016 AT dudarevas implicationsofachangeincasedefinitionandscreeningofasylumseekersforhepatitisbsurveillanceingermanyin2015and2016 |