Cargando…
Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia
BACKGROUND: Mosquito-feeding assays that assess transmission of Plasmodium from man-to-mosquito typically use laboratory mosquito colonies. The microbiome and genetic background of local mosquitoes may be different and influence Plasmodium transmission efficiency. In order to interpret transmission...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3998-2 |
_version_ | 1783504014596374528 |
---|---|
author | Chali, Wakweya Ashine, Temesgen Hailemeskel, Elifaged Gashaw, Abrham Tafesse, Temesgen Lanke, Kjerstin Esayas, Endashaw Kedir, Soriya Shumie, Girma Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde Bradley, John Yewhalaw, Delenasaw Mamo, Hassen Petros, Beyene Drakeley, Chris Gadisa, Endalamaw Bousema, Teun Tadesse, Fitsum G. |
author_facet | Chali, Wakweya Ashine, Temesgen Hailemeskel, Elifaged Gashaw, Abrham Tafesse, Temesgen Lanke, Kjerstin Esayas, Endashaw Kedir, Soriya Shumie, Girma Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde Bradley, John Yewhalaw, Delenasaw Mamo, Hassen Petros, Beyene Drakeley, Chris Gadisa, Endalamaw Bousema, Teun Tadesse, Fitsum G. |
author_sort | Chali, Wakweya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mosquito-feeding assays that assess transmission of Plasmodium from man-to-mosquito typically use laboratory mosquito colonies. The microbiome and genetic background of local mosquitoes may be different and influence Plasmodium transmission efficiency. In order to interpret transmission studies to the local epidemiology, it is therefore crucial to understand the relationship between infectivity in laboratory-adapted and local mosquitoes. METHODS: We assessed infectivity of Plasmodium vivax-infected patients from Adama, Ethiopia, using laboratory-adapted (colony) and wild-caught (wild) mosquitoes raised from larval collections in paired feeding experiments. Feeding assays used 4–6 day-old female Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes after starvation for 12 h (colony) and 18 h (wild). Oocyst development was assessed microscopically 7 days post-feeding. Wild mosquitoes were identified morphologically and confirmed by genotyping. Asexual parasites and gametocytes were quantified in donor blood by microscopy. RESULTS: In 36 paired experiments (25 P. vivax infections and 11 co-infections with P. falciparum), feeding efficiency was higher in colony (median: 62.5%; interquartile range, IQR: 47.0–79.0%) compared to wild mosquitoes (median: 27.8%; IQR: 17.0–38.0%; Z = 5.02; P < 0.001). Plasmodium vivax from infectious individuals (51.6%, 16/31) infected a median of 55.0% (IQR: 6.7–85.7%; range: 5.5–96.7%; n = 14) of the colony and 52.7% (IQR: 20.0–80.0%; range: 3.2–95.0%; n = 14) of the wild mosquitoes. A strong association (ρ((16)) = 0.819; P < 0.001) was observed between the proportion of infected wild and colony mosquitoes. A positive association was detected between microscopically detected gametocytes and the proportion of infected colony (ρ((31)) = 0.452; P = 0.011) and wild (ρ((31)) = 0.386; P = 0.032) mosquitoes. CONCLUSIONS: Infectivity assessments with colony and wild mosquitoes yielded similar infection results. This finding supports the use of colony mosquitoes for assessments of the infectious reservoir for malaria in this setting whilst acknowledging the importance of mosquito factors influencing sporogonic development of Plasmodium parasites. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7059271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70592712020-03-12 Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia Chali, Wakweya Ashine, Temesgen Hailemeskel, Elifaged Gashaw, Abrham Tafesse, Temesgen Lanke, Kjerstin Esayas, Endashaw Kedir, Soriya Shumie, Girma Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde Bradley, John Yewhalaw, Delenasaw Mamo, Hassen Petros, Beyene Drakeley, Chris Gadisa, Endalamaw Bousema, Teun Tadesse, Fitsum G. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Mosquito-feeding assays that assess transmission of Plasmodium from man-to-mosquito typically use laboratory mosquito colonies. The microbiome and genetic background of local mosquitoes may be different and influence Plasmodium transmission efficiency. In order to interpret transmission studies to the local epidemiology, it is therefore crucial to understand the relationship between infectivity in laboratory-adapted and local mosquitoes. METHODS: We assessed infectivity of Plasmodium vivax-infected patients from Adama, Ethiopia, using laboratory-adapted (colony) and wild-caught (wild) mosquitoes raised from larval collections in paired feeding experiments. Feeding assays used 4–6 day-old female Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes after starvation for 12 h (colony) and 18 h (wild). Oocyst development was assessed microscopically 7 days post-feeding. Wild mosquitoes were identified morphologically and confirmed by genotyping. Asexual parasites and gametocytes were quantified in donor blood by microscopy. RESULTS: In 36 paired experiments (25 P. vivax infections and 11 co-infections with P. falciparum), feeding efficiency was higher in colony (median: 62.5%; interquartile range, IQR: 47.0–79.0%) compared to wild mosquitoes (median: 27.8%; IQR: 17.0–38.0%; Z = 5.02; P < 0.001). Plasmodium vivax from infectious individuals (51.6%, 16/31) infected a median of 55.0% (IQR: 6.7–85.7%; range: 5.5–96.7%; n = 14) of the colony and 52.7% (IQR: 20.0–80.0%; range: 3.2–95.0%; n = 14) of the wild mosquitoes. A strong association (ρ((16)) = 0.819; P < 0.001) was observed between the proportion of infected wild and colony mosquitoes. A positive association was detected between microscopically detected gametocytes and the proportion of infected colony (ρ((31)) = 0.452; P = 0.011) and wild (ρ((31)) = 0.386; P = 0.032) mosquitoes. CONCLUSIONS: Infectivity assessments with colony and wild mosquitoes yielded similar infection results. This finding supports the use of colony mosquitoes for assessments of the infectious reservoir for malaria in this setting whilst acknowledging the importance of mosquito factors influencing sporogonic development of Plasmodium parasites. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7059271/ /pubmed/32143713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3998-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chali, Wakweya Ashine, Temesgen Hailemeskel, Elifaged Gashaw, Abrham Tafesse, Temesgen Lanke, Kjerstin Esayas, Endashaw Kedir, Soriya Shumie, Girma Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde Bradley, John Yewhalaw, Delenasaw Mamo, Hassen Petros, Beyene Drakeley, Chris Gadisa, Endalamaw Bousema, Teun Tadesse, Fitsum G. Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia |
title | Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia |
title_full | Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia |
title_short | Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia |
title_sort | comparison of infectivity of plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in ethiopia |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3998-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaliwakweya comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT ashinetemesgen comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT hailemeskelelifaged comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT gashawabrham comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT tafessetemesgen comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT lankekjerstin comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT esayasendashaw comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT kedirsoriya comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT shumiegirma comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT behaksrasinkneshwolde comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT bradleyjohn comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT yewhalawdelenasaw comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT mamohassen comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT petrosbeyene comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT drakeleychris comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT gadisaendalamaw comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT bousemateun comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia AT tadessefitsumg comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia |