Cargando…

Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Mosquito-feeding assays that assess transmission of Plasmodium from man-to-mosquito typically use laboratory mosquito colonies. The microbiome and genetic background of local mosquitoes may be different and influence Plasmodium transmission efficiency. In order to interpret transmission...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chali, Wakweya, Ashine, Temesgen, Hailemeskel, Elifaged, Gashaw, Abrham, Tafesse, Temesgen, Lanke, Kjerstin, Esayas, Endashaw, Kedir, Soriya, Shumie, Girma, Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde, Bradley, John, Yewhalaw, Delenasaw, Mamo, Hassen, Petros, Beyene, Drakeley, Chris, Gadisa, Endalamaw, Bousema, Teun, Tadesse, Fitsum G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3998-2
_version_ 1783504014596374528
author Chali, Wakweya
Ashine, Temesgen
Hailemeskel, Elifaged
Gashaw, Abrham
Tafesse, Temesgen
Lanke, Kjerstin
Esayas, Endashaw
Kedir, Soriya
Shumie, Girma
Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde
Bradley, John
Yewhalaw, Delenasaw
Mamo, Hassen
Petros, Beyene
Drakeley, Chris
Gadisa, Endalamaw
Bousema, Teun
Tadesse, Fitsum G.
author_facet Chali, Wakweya
Ashine, Temesgen
Hailemeskel, Elifaged
Gashaw, Abrham
Tafesse, Temesgen
Lanke, Kjerstin
Esayas, Endashaw
Kedir, Soriya
Shumie, Girma
Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde
Bradley, John
Yewhalaw, Delenasaw
Mamo, Hassen
Petros, Beyene
Drakeley, Chris
Gadisa, Endalamaw
Bousema, Teun
Tadesse, Fitsum G.
author_sort Chali, Wakweya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mosquito-feeding assays that assess transmission of Plasmodium from man-to-mosquito typically use laboratory mosquito colonies. The microbiome and genetic background of local mosquitoes may be different and influence Plasmodium transmission efficiency. In order to interpret transmission studies to the local epidemiology, it is therefore crucial to understand the relationship between infectivity in laboratory-adapted and local mosquitoes. METHODS: We assessed infectivity of Plasmodium vivax-infected patients from Adama, Ethiopia, using laboratory-adapted (colony) and wild-caught (wild) mosquitoes raised from larval collections in paired feeding experiments. Feeding assays used 4–6 day-old female Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes after starvation for 12 h (colony) and 18 h (wild). Oocyst development was assessed microscopically 7 days post-feeding. Wild mosquitoes were identified morphologically and confirmed by genotyping. Asexual parasites and gametocytes were quantified in donor blood by microscopy. RESULTS: In 36 paired experiments (25 P. vivax infections and 11 co-infections with P. falciparum), feeding efficiency was higher in colony (median: 62.5%; interquartile range, IQR: 47.0–79.0%) compared to wild mosquitoes (median: 27.8%; IQR: 17.0–38.0%; Z = 5.02; P < 0.001). Plasmodium vivax from infectious individuals (51.6%, 16/31) infected a median of 55.0% (IQR: 6.7–85.7%; range: 5.5–96.7%; n = 14) of the colony and 52.7% (IQR: 20.0–80.0%; range: 3.2–95.0%; n = 14) of the wild mosquitoes. A strong association (ρ((16)) = 0.819; P < 0.001) was observed between the proportion of infected wild and colony mosquitoes. A positive association was detected between microscopically detected gametocytes and the proportion of infected colony (ρ((31)) = 0.452; P = 0.011) and wild (ρ((31)) = 0.386; P = 0.032) mosquitoes. CONCLUSIONS: Infectivity assessments with colony and wild mosquitoes yielded similar infection results. This finding supports the use of colony mosquitoes for assessments of the infectious reservoir for malaria in this setting whilst acknowledging the importance of mosquito factors influencing sporogonic development of Plasmodium parasites. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7059271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70592712020-03-12 Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia Chali, Wakweya Ashine, Temesgen Hailemeskel, Elifaged Gashaw, Abrham Tafesse, Temesgen Lanke, Kjerstin Esayas, Endashaw Kedir, Soriya Shumie, Girma Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde Bradley, John Yewhalaw, Delenasaw Mamo, Hassen Petros, Beyene Drakeley, Chris Gadisa, Endalamaw Bousema, Teun Tadesse, Fitsum G. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Mosquito-feeding assays that assess transmission of Plasmodium from man-to-mosquito typically use laboratory mosquito colonies. The microbiome and genetic background of local mosquitoes may be different and influence Plasmodium transmission efficiency. In order to interpret transmission studies to the local epidemiology, it is therefore crucial to understand the relationship between infectivity in laboratory-adapted and local mosquitoes. METHODS: We assessed infectivity of Plasmodium vivax-infected patients from Adama, Ethiopia, using laboratory-adapted (colony) and wild-caught (wild) mosquitoes raised from larval collections in paired feeding experiments. Feeding assays used 4–6 day-old female Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes after starvation for 12 h (colony) and 18 h (wild). Oocyst development was assessed microscopically 7 days post-feeding. Wild mosquitoes were identified morphologically and confirmed by genotyping. Asexual parasites and gametocytes were quantified in donor blood by microscopy. RESULTS: In 36 paired experiments (25 P. vivax infections and 11 co-infections with P. falciparum), feeding efficiency was higher in colony (median: 62.5%; interquartile range, IQR: 47.0–79.0%) compared to wild mosquitoes (median: 27.8%; IQR: 17.0–38.0%; Z = 5.02; P < 0.001). Plasmodium vivax from infectious individuals (51.6%, 16/31) infected a median of 55.0% (IQR: 6.7–85.7%; range: 5.5–96.7%; n = 14) of the colony and 52.7% (IQR: 20.0–80.0%; range: 3.2–95.0%; n = 14) of the wild mosquitoes. A strong association (ρ((16)) = 0.819; P < 0.001) was observed between the proportion of infected wild and colony mosquitoes. A positive association was detected between microscopically detected gametocytes and the proportion of infected colony (ρ((31)) = 0.452; P = 0.011) and wild (ρ((31)) = 0.386; P = 0.032) mosquitoes. CONCLUSIONS: Infectivity assessments with colony and wild mosquitoes yielded similar infection results. This finding supports the use of colony mosquitoes for assessments of the infectious reservoir for malaria in this setting whilst acknowledging the importance of mosquito factors influencing sporogonic development of Plasmodium parasites. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7059271/ /pubmed/32143713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3998-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chali, Wakweya
Ashine, Temesgen
Hailemeskel, Elifaged
Gashaw, Abrham
Tafesse, Temesgen
Lanke, Kjerstin
Esayas, Endashaw
Kedir, Soriya
Shumie, Girma
Behaksra, Sinknesh Wolde
Bradley, John
Yewhalaw, Delenasaw
Mamo, Hassen
Petros, Beyene
Drakeley, Chris
Gadisa, Endalamaw
Bousema, Teun
Tadesse, Fitsum G.
Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia
title Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia
title_full Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia
title_fullStr Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia
title_short Comparison of infectivity of Plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Ethiopia
title_sort comparison of infectivity of plasmodium vivax to wild-caught and laboratory-adapted (colonized) anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in ethiopia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3998-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chaliwakweya comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT ashinetemesgen comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT hailemeskelelifaged comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT gashawabrham comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT tafessetemesgen comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT lankekjerstin comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT esayasendashaw comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT kedirsoriya comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT shumiegirma comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT behaksrasinkneshwolde comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT bradleyjohn comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT yewhalawdelenasaw comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT mamohassen comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT petrosbeyene comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT drakeleychris comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT gadisaendalamaw comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT bousemateun comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia
AT tadessefitsumg comparisonofinfectivityofplasmodiumvivaxtowildcaughtandlaboratoryadaptedcolonizedanophelesarabiensismosquitoesinethiopia