Cargando…

A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study

BACKGROUND: Due to increasing bacterial resistance rates choosing a correct empiric antibiotic therapy is getting more and more complex. Often medical doctors use information tools to make the right treatment choice. METHODS: One hundred sixty six participants (77 medical doctors and 89 medical stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neugebauer, M., Ebert, M., Vogelmann, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5045-6
_version_ 1783504027586134016
author Neugebauer, M.
Ebert, M.
Vogelmann, R.
author_facet Neugebauer, M.
Ebert, M.
Vogelmann, R.
author_sort Neugebauer, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to increasing bacterial resistance rates choosing a correct empiric antibiotic therapy is getting more and more complex. Often medical doctors use information tools to make the right treatment choice. METHODS: One hundred sixty six participants (77 medical doctors and 89 medical students) were asked to provide a diagnosis and antibiotic therapy in a simple fictive paper case of upper urinary tract infection (UTI) in a randomized single-blinded study. Participants were randomized to one of four information tools they were allowed to use in the study or control: 1. free internet access, 2. pharmaceutical pocket guide, 3. pocket guide antibiotic therapy, 4. clinical decision support system (CDSS), and control (no information tool). The CDSS was designed for the study. The adherence to the national German UTI guideline was evaluated. RESULTS: Only 27.1% (n = 45/166) provided a correct diagnosis of upper UTI and 19.4% (n = 32/166) an antibiotic treatment recommended by national German treatment guidelines indicating their need for information tools. This result was not significantly different between medical doctors and medical students, residents and medical specialists or level of working experience. Using CDSS improved results significantly compared to conventional tools (diagnosis 57.1%; treatment recommendation 40.5%; p < 0,01). Processing time was not different between the use of CDSS and conventional information tools. CDSS users based their decision making on their assigned information tool more than users of conventional tools (73.8% vs. 48.0%; p < 0.01). Using CDSS improved the confidence of participants in their recommendation significantly compared to conventional tools (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that medical professionals require information tools in diagnosing and treating a simple case of upper UTI correctly. CDSS appears to be superior to conventional tools as an information source.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7059328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70593282020-03-12 A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study Neugebauer, M. Ebert, M. Vogelmann, R. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to increasing bacterial resistance rates choosing a correct empiric antibiotic therapy is getting more and more complex. Often medical doctors use information tools to make the right treatment choice. METHODS: One hundred sixty six participants (77 medical doctors and 89 medical students) were asked to provide a diagnosis and antibiotic therapy in a simple fictive paper case of upper urinary tract infection (UTI) in a randomized single-blinded study. Participants were randomized to one of four information tools they were allowed to use in the study or control: 1. free internet access, 2. pharmaceutical pocket guide, 3. pocket guide antibiotic therapy, 4. clinical decision support system (CDSS), and control (no information tool). The CDSS was designed for the study. The adherence to the national German UTI guideline was evaluated. RESULTS: Only 27.1% (n = 45/166) provided a correct diagnosis of upper UTI and 19.4% (n = 32/166) an antibiotic treatment recommended by national German treatment guidelines indicating their need for information tools. This result was not significantly different between medical doctors and medical students, residents and medical specialists or level of working experience. Using CDSS improved results significantly compared to conventional tools (diagnosis 57.1%; treatment recommendation 40.5%; p < 0,01). Processing time was not different between the use of CDSS and conventional information tools. CDSS users based their decision making on their assigned information tool more than users of conventional tools (73.8% vs. 48.0%; p < 0.01). Using CDSS improved the confidence of participants in their recommendation significantly compared to conventional tools (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that medical professionals require information tools in diagnosing and treating a simple case of upper UTI correctly. CDSS appears to be superior to conventional tools as an information source. BioMed Central 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7059328/ /pubmed/32143630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5045-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neugebauer, M.
Ebert, M.
Vogelmann, R.
A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study
title A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study
title_full A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study
title_fullStr A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study
title_full_unstemmed A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study
title_short A clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study
title_sort clinical decision support system improves antibiotic therapy for upper urinary tract infection in a randomized single-blinded study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5045-6
work_keys_str_mv AT neugebauerm aclinicaldecisionsupportsystemimprovesantibiotictherapyforupperurinarytractinfectioninarandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT ebertm aclinicaldecisionsupportsystemimprovesantibiotictherapyforupperurinarytractinfectioninarandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT vogelmannr aclinicaldecisionsupportsystemimprovesantibiotictherapyforupperurinarytractinfectioninarandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT neugebauerm clinicaldecisionsupportsystemimprovesantibiotictherapyforupperurinarytractinfectioninarandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT ebertm clinicaldecisionsupportsystemimprovesantibiotictherapyforupperurinarytractinfectioninarandomizedsingleblindedstudy
AT vogelmannr clinicaldecisionsupportsystemimprovesantibiotictherapyforupperurinarytractinfectioninarandomizedsingleblindedstudy