Cargando…
OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section
BACKGROUND: Despite evidence supporting the safety of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), rates are low in many countries. METHODS: OptiBIRTH investigated the effects of a woman-centred intervention designed to increase VBAC rates through an unblinded cluster randomised trial in 15 materni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2829-y |
_version_ | 1783504042973986816 |
---|---|
author | Clarke, Mike Devane, Declan Gross, Mechthild M. Morano, Sandra Lundgren, Ingela Sinclair, Marlene Putman, Koen Beech, Beverley Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne Wiseman, Hugh Smith, Valerie Daly, Deirdre Savage, Gerard Newell, John Simpkin, Andrew Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne Healy, Patricia Nicoletti, Jane Lalor, Joan Carroll, Margaret van Limbeek, Evelien Nilsson, Christina Stockdale, Janine Fobelets, Maaike Begley, Cecily |
author_facet | Clarke, Mike Devane, Declan Gross, Mechthild M. Morano, Sandra Lundgren, Ingela Sinclair, Marlene Putman, Koen Beech, Beverley Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne Wiseman, Hugh Smith, Valerie Daly, Deirdre Savage, Gerard Newell, John Simpkin, Andrew Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne Healy, Patricia Nicoletti, Jane Lalor, Joan Carroll, Margaret van Limbeek, Evelien Nilsson, Christina Stockdale, Janine Fobelets, Maaike Begley, Cecily |
author_sort | Clarke, Mike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite evidence supporting the safety of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), rates are low in many countries. METHODS: OptiBIRTH investigated the effects of a woman-centred intervention designed to increase VBAC rates through an unblinded cluster randomised trial in 15 maternity units with VBAC rates < 35% in Germany, Ireland and Italy. Sites were matched in pairs or triplets based on annual birth numbers and VBAC rate, and randomised, 1:1 or 2:1, intervention versus control, following trial registration. The intervention involved evidence-based education of clinicians and women with one previous caesarean section (CS), appointment of opinion leaders, audit/peer review, and joint discussions by women and clinicians. Control sites provided usual care. Primary outcome was annual hospital-level VBAC rates before the trial (2012) versus final year of the trial (2016). Between April 2014 and October 2015, 2002 women were recruited (intervention 1195, control 807), with mode-of-birth data available for 1940 women. RESULTS: The OptiBIRTH intervention was feasible and safe across hospital settings in three countries. There was no statistically significant difference in the change in the proportion of women having a VBAC between intervention sites (25.6% in 2012 to 25.1% in 2016) and control sites (18.3 to 22.3%) (odds ratio adjusted for differences between intervention and control groups (2012) and for homogeneity in VBAC rates at sites in the countries: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.14, p = 0.32 based on 5674 women (2012) and 5284 (2016) with outcome data. Among recruited women with birth data, 4/1147 perinatal deaths > 24 weeks gestation occurred in the intervention group (0.34%) and 4/782 in the control group (0.51%), and two uterine ruptures (one per group), a rate of 1:1000. CONCLUSIONS: Changing clinical practice takes time. As elective repeat CS is the most common reason for CS in multiparous women, interventions that are feasible and safe and that have been shown to lead to decreasing repeat CS, should be promoted. Continued research to refine the best way of promoting VBAC is essential. This may best be done using an implementation science approach that can modify evidence-based interventions in response to changing clinical circumstances. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The OptiBIRTH trial was registered on 3/4/2013. Trial registration number ISRCTN10612254. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7059398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70593982020-03-12 OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section Clarke, Mike Devane, Declan Gross, Mechthild M. Morano, Sandra Lundgren, Ingela Sinclair, Marlene Putman, Koen Beech, Beverley Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne Wiseman, Hugh Smith, Valerie Daly, Deirdre Savage, Gerard Newell, John Simpkin, Andrew Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne Healy, Patricia Nicoletti, Jane Lalor, Joan Carroll, Margaret van Limbeek, Evelien Nilsson, Christina Stockdale, Janine Fobelets, Maaike Begley, Cecily BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite evidence supporting the safety of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), rates are low in many countries. METHODS: OptiBIRTH investigated the effects of a woman-centred intervention designed to increase VBAC rates through an unblinded cluster randomised trial in 15 maternity units with VBAC rates < 35% in Germany, Ireland and Italy. Sites were matched in pairs or triplets based on annual birth numbers and VBAC rate, and randomised, 1:1 or 2:1, intervention versus control, following trial registration. The intervention involved evidence-based education of clinicians and women with one previous caesarean section (CS), appointment of opinion leaders, audit/peer review, and joint discussions by women and clinicians. Control sites provided usual care. Primary outcome was annual hospital-level VBAC rates before the trial (2012) versus final year of the trial (2016). Between April 2014 and October 2015, 2002 women were recruited (intervention 1195, control 807), with mode-of-birth data available for 1940 women. RESULTS: The OptiBIRTH intervention was feasible and safe across hospital settings in three countries. There was no statistically significant difference in the change in the proportion of women having a VBAC between intervention sites (25.6% in 2012 to 25.1% in 2016) and control sites (18.3 to 22.3%) (odds ratio adjusted for differences between intervention and control groups (2012) and for homogeneity in VBAC rates at sites in the countries: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.14, p = 0.32 based on 5674 women (2012) and 5284 (2016) with outcome data. Among recruited women with birth data, 4/1147 perinatal deaths > 24 weeks gestation occurred in the intervention group (0.34%) and 4/782 in the control group (0.51%), and two uterine ruptures (one per group), a rate of 1:1000. CONCLUSIONS: Changing clinical practice takes time. As elective repeat CS is the most common reason for CS in multiparous women, interventions that are feasible and safe and that have been shown to lead to decreasing repeat CS, should be promoted. Continued research to refine the best way of promoting VBAC is essential. This may best be done using an implementation science approach that can modify evidence-based interventions in response to changing clinical circumstances. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The OptiBIRTH trial was registered on 3/4/2013. Trial registration number ISRCTN10612254. BioMed Central 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7059398/ /pubmed/32138712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2829-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Clarke, Mike Devane, Declan Gross, Mechthild M. Morano, Sandra Lundgren, Ingela Sinclair, Marlene Putman, Koen Beech, Beverley Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Katri Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne Wiseman, Hugh Smith, Valerie Daly, Deirdre Savage, Gerard Newell, John Simpkin, Andrew Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne Healy, Patricia Nicoletti, Jane Lalor, Joan Carroll, Margaret van Limbeek, Evelien Nilsson, Christina Stockdale, Janine Fobelets, Maaike Begley, Cecily OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section |
title | OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section |
title_full | OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section |
title_fullStr | OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section |
title_full_unstemmed | OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section |
title_short | OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section |
title_sort | optibirth: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2829-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarkemike optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT devanedeclan optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT grossmechthildm optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT moranosandra optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT lundgreningela optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT sinclairmarlene optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT putmankoen optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT beechbeverley optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT vehvilainenjulkunenkatri optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT nieuwenhuijzemarianne optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT wisemanhugh optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT smithvalerie optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT dalydeirdre optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT savagegerard optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT newelljohn optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT simpkinandrew optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT grylkabaeschlinsusanne optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT healypatricia optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT nicolettijane optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT lalorjoan optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT carrollmargaret optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT vanlimbeekevelien optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT nilssonchristina optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT stockdalejanine optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT fobeletsmaaike optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection AT begleycecily optibirthaclusterrandomisedtrialofacomplexinterventiontoincreasevaginalbirthaftercaesareansection |