Cargando…

Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is common (prevalence 1%–2%). Two-thirds of children experience moderate or severe pain, which is associated with increased fatigue and poorer physical function. However, we do not know if treatment for CFS/ME improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ascough, Caitlin, King, Hayley, Serafimova, Teona, Beasant, Lucy, Jackson, Sophie, Baldock, Luke, Pickering, Anthony Edward, Brooks, Jonathan, Crawley, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000617
_version_ 1783504049757224960
author Ascough, Caitlin
King, Hayley
Serafimova, Teona
Beasant, Lucy
Jackson, Sophie
Baldock, Luke
Pickering, Anthony Edward
Brooks, Jonathan
Crawley, Esther
author_facet Ascough, Caitlin
King, Hayley
Serafimova, Teona
Beasant, Lucy
Jackson, Sophie
Baldock, Luke
Pickering, Anthony Edward
Brooks, Jonathan
Crawley, Esther
author_sort Ascough, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is common (prevalence 1%–2%). Two-thirds of children experience moderate or severe pain, which is associated with increased fatigue and poorer physical function. However, we do not know if treatment for CFS/ME improves pain. OBJECTIVE: Identify whether specialist treatment of paediatric CFS/ME improves pain. METHODS: We conducted a detailed search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened texts published between 1994 and 24 January 2019 with no language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were (1) randomised controlled trials and observational studies; (2) participants aged <19 years with CFS/ME; and (3) measure of pain before and after an intervention. RESULTS: Of 1898 papers screened, 26 studies investigated treatment for paediatric CFS/ME, 19 of which did not measure pain at any time point. Only five treatment studies measured pain at baseline and follow-up and were included in this review. None of the interventions were specifically targeted at treating pain. Of the included studies, two showed no improvement in pain scores, one suggested an improvement in one subgroup and two studies identified improvements in pain measures in ‘recovered’ patients compared with ‘non-recovered’ patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the prevalence and impact of pain in children with CFS/ME surprisingly few treatment studies measured pain. In those that did measure pain, the treatments used focused on overall management of CFS/ME and we identified no treatments that were targeted specifically at managing pain. There is limited evidence that treatment helps improve pain scores. However, patients who recover appear to have less pain than those who do not recover. More studies are needed to determine if pain in paediatric CFS/ME requires a specific treatment approach, with a particular focus on patients who do not recover following initial treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019117540.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7059437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70594372020-03-20 Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review Ascough, Caitlin King, Hayley Serafimova, Teona Beasant, Lucy Jackson, Sophie Baldock, Luke Pickering, Anthony Edward Brooks, Jonathan Crawley, Esther BMJ Paediatr Open Pain BACKGROUND: Paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is common (prevalence 1%–2%). Two-thirds of children experience moderate or severe pain, which is associated with increased fatigue and poorer physical function. However, we do not know if treatment for CFS/ME improves pain. OBJECTIVE: Identify whether specialist treatment of paediatric CFS/ME improves pain. METHODS: We conducted a detailed search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened texts published between 1994 and 24 January 2019 with no language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were (1) randomised controlled trials and observational studies; (2) participants aged <19 years with CFS/ME; and (3) measure of pain before and after an intervention. RESULTS: Of 1898 papers screened, 26 studies investigated treatment for paediatric CFS/ME, 19 of which did not measure pain at any time point. Only five treatment studies measured pain at baseline and follow-up and were included in this review. None of the interventions were specifically targeted at treating pain. Of the included studies, two showed no improvement in pain scores, one suggested an improvement in one subgroup and two studies identified improvements in pain measures in ‘recovered’ patients compared with ‘non-recovered’ patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the prevalence and impact of pain in children with CFS/ME surprisingly few treatment studies measured pain. In those that did measure pain, the treatments used focused on overall management of CFS/ME and we identified no treatments that were targeted specifically at managing pain. There is limited evidence that treatment helps improve pain scores. However, patients who recover appear to have less pain than those who do not recover. More studies are needed to determine if pain in paediatric CFS/ME requires a specific treatment approach, with a particular focus on patients who do not recover following initial treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019117540. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7059437/ /pubmed/32201745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000617 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Pain
Ascough, Caitlin
King, Hayley
Serafimova, Teona
Beasant, Lucy
Jackson, Sophie
Baldock, Luke
Pickering, Anthony Edward
Brooks, Jonathan
Crawley, Esther
Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review
title Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review
title_full Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review
title_short Interventions to treat pain in paediatric CFS/ME: a systematic review
title_sort interventions to treat pain in paediatric cfs/me: a systematic review
topic Pain
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000617
work_keys_str_mv AT ascoughcaitlin interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT kinghayley interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT serafimovateona interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT beasantlucy interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT jacksonsophie interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT baldockluke interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT pickeringanthonyedward interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT brooksjonathan interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview
AT crawleyesther interventionstotreatpaininpaediatriccfsmeasystematicreview