Cargando…
Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock
OBJECTIVES: To describe the contemporary trends in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS). To evaluate survival benefit with early application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella CP. METHODS: A cohort stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214 |
_version_ | 1783504067078651904 |
---|---|
author | Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche Josiassen, Jakob Hassager, Christian Jensen, Lisette Okkels Holmvang, Lene Udesen, Nanna Louise Junker Schmidt, Henrik Berg Ravn, Hanne Moller, Jacob Eifer |
author_facet | Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche Josiassen, Jakob Hassager, Christian Jensen, Lisette Okkels Holmvang, Lene Udesen, Nanna Louise Junker Schmidt, Henrik Berg Ravn, Hanne Moller, Jacob Eifer |
author_sort | Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To describe the contemporary trends in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS). To evaluate survival benefit with early application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella CP. METHODS: A cohort study of all consecutive patients with AMICS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) <24 hours of symptom onset (early PCI) in southeastern Denmark from 2010 to 2017. A matched case–control study comparing 30-day mortality between patients receiving early-IABP or early-Impella CP and their respective control group. Controls were matched on age, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial lactate, estimated glomerular filtration rate and cardiac arrest before PCI. Early-IABP/Impella CP was defined as applied before PCI if shock developed pre-PCI, or immediately after PCI if shock developed during PCI. RESULTS: 903 patients with AMICS undergoing early PCI were identified. Use of MCS decreased from 50% in 2010 to 25% in 2017, p for trend of <0.001. The IABP was abandoned in 2012 and replaced mostly by Impella CP. Patients receiving MCS in 2013–2017 had more compromised haemodynamics compared with patients receiving MCS in 2010–2012. 40 patients received early IABP, and 40 patients received early Impella CP. Only the group receiving early Impella CP was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with their matched control group (30-day mortality 40% vs 77.5%, plog-rank of<0.001). CONCLUSION: Use of MCS decreased by 50% from 2010 to 2017. Patients receiving MCS had more compromised haemodynamics in recent years. Early application of Impella CP was associated with reduced 30-day mortality compared with a matched control group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7059524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70595242020-03-20 Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche Josiassen, Jakob Hassager, Christian Jensen, Lisette Okkels Holmvang, Lene Udesen, Nanna Louise Junker Schmidt, Henrik Berg Ravn, Hanne Moller, Jacob Eifer Open Heart Interventional Cardiology OBJECTIVES: To describe the contemporary trends in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS). To evaluate survival benefit with early application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella CP. METHODS: A cohort study of all consecutive patients with AMICS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) <24 hours of symptom onset (early PCI) in southeastern Denmark from 2010 to 2017. A matched case–control study comparing 30-day mortality between patients receiving early-IABP or early-Impella CP and their respective control group. Controls were matched on age, left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial lactate, estimated glomerular filtration rate and cardiac arrest before PCI. Early-IABP/Impella CP was defined as applied before PCI if shock developed pre-PCI, or immediately after PCI if shock developed during PCI. RESULTS: 903 patients with AMICS undergoing early PCI were identified. Use of MCS decreased from 50% in 2010 to 25% in 2017, p for trend of <0.001. The IABP was abandoned in 2012 and replaced mostly by Impella CP. Patients receiving MCS in 2013–2017 had more compromised haemodynamics compared with patients receiving MCS in 2010–2012. 40 patients received early IABP, and 40 patients received early Impella CP. Only the group receiving early Impella CP was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with their matched control group (30-day mortality 40% vs 77.5%, plog-rank of<0.001). CONCLUSION: Use of MCS decreased by 50% from 2010 to 2017. Patients receiving MCS had more compromised haemodynamics in recent years. Early application of Impella CP was associated with reduced 30-day mortality compared with a matched control group. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7059524/ /pubmed/32201591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Interventional Cardiology Helgestad, Ole Kristian Lerche Josiassen, Jakob Hassager, Christian Jensen, Lisette Okkels Holmvang, Lene Udesen, Nanna Louise Junker Schmidt, Henrik Berg Ravn, Hanne Moller, Jacob Eifer Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock |
title | Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock |
title_full | Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock |
title_fullStr | Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock |
title_short | Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock |
title_sort | contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute mi and cardiogenic shock |
topic | Interventional Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helgestadolekristianlerche contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT josiassenjakob contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT hassagerchristian contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT jensenlisetteokkels contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT holmvanglene contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT udesennannalouisejunker contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT schmidthenrik contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT bergravnhanne contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock AT mollerjacobeifer contemporarytrendsinuseofmechanicalcirculatorysupportinpatientswithacutemiandcardiogenicshock |