Cargando…

Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature

Recent theorizing about the connection between the brain and trauma (Perry, 2009; Porges, 2011; van der Kolk, 2015) has led to a burgeoning of interest in the provision of music-based programs with people who have had adverse experiences. Although there has been critique of the lack of scientific ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McFerran, Katrina Skewes, Lai, Hsin I. Cindy, Chang, Wei-Han, Acquaro, Daniela, Chin, Tan Chyuan, Stokes, Helen, Crooke, Alexander Hew Dale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32180753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00324
_version_ 1783504085276688384
author McFerran, Katrina Skewes
Lai, Hsin I. Cindy
Chang, Wei-Han
Acquaro, Daniela
Chin, Tan Chyuan
Stokes, Helen
Crooke, Alexander Hew Dale
author_facet McFerran, Katrina Skewes
Lai, Hsin I. Cindy
Chang, Wei-Han
Acquaro, Daniela
Chin, Tan Chyuan
Stokes, Helen
Crooke, Alexander Hew Dale
author_sort McFerran, Katrina Skewes
collection PubMed
description Recent theorizing about the connection between the brain and trauma (Perry, 2009; Porges, 2011; van der Kolk, 2015) has led to a burgeoning of interest in the provision of music-based programs with people who have had adverse experiences. Although there has been critique of the lack of scientific basis of these theories and their implications for practice (McLean, 2016), they remain popular with practitioners who are keen to introduce innovative and potentially beneficial approaches to the people with whom they work. Music therapists have a long tradition of working with traumatized clients, however, the brain-based rationales did not seem congruent with the less predictable and more idiosyncratic benefits reported, which seem to occur through more psychodynamic mechanisms of action. In order to unravel what seemed to be a body of literature plagued by the conflation of theories, we undertook a critical interpretive synthesis of literature in the past 10 years to cross-examine the ways that music and trauma have been connected. To do this we extracted data from 36 identified articles to distinguish what music methods were used, what claims were made about benefits, what theoretical justifications were provided and how much research basis there was for the claims being made. Having systematically disentangled the various dimensions, we then constructed a spectrum of approaches that offers a logical categorization of four different ways of using music with people who have had adverse life experiences. These included using music for stabilizing, entrainment, expressive and performative purposes. Specific music-based methods were proposed for those associated with brain-based rationales, and more responsive, multi-method approaches were congruent with recovery and social change models. Future research would benefit from a more clearly articulated connection between theoretical rationale, music-based methods, benefits and research approaches. The resultant spectrum may provide useful guidance for both practice and research design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7059618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70596182020-03-16 Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature McFerran, Katrina Skewes Lai, Hsin I. Cindy Chang, Wei-Han Acquaro, Daniela Chin, Tan Chyuan Stokes, Helen Crooke, Alexander Hew Dale Front Psychol Psychology Recent theorizing about the connection between the brain and trauma (Perry, 2009; Porges, 2011; van der Kolk, 2015) has led to a burgeoning of interest in the provision of music-based programs with people who have had adverse experiences. Although there has been critique of the lack of scientific basis of these theories and their implications for practice (McLean, 2016), they remain popular with practitioners who are keen to introduce innovative and potentially beneficial approaches to the people with whom they work. Music therapists have a long tradition of working with traumatized clients, however, the brain-based rationales did not seem congruent with the less predictable and more idiosyncratic benefits reported, which seem to occur through more psychodynamic mechanisms of action. In order to unravel what seemed to be a body of literature plagued by the conflation of theories, we undertook a critical interpretive synthesis of literature in the past 10 years to cross-examine the ways that music and trauma have been connected. To do this we extracted data from 36 identified articles to distinguish what music methods were used, what claims were made about benefits, what theoretical justifications were provided and how much research basis there was for the claims being made. Having systematically disentangled the various dimensions, we then constructed a spectrum of approaches that offers a logical categorization of four different ways of using music with people who have had adverse life experiences. These included using music for stabilizing, entrainment, expressive and performative purposes. Specific music-based methods were proposed for those associated with brain-based rationales, and more responsive, multi-method approaches were congruent with recovery and social change models. Future research would benefit from a more clearly articulated connection between theoretical rationale, music-based methods, benefits and research approaches. The resultant spectrum may provide useful guidance for both practice and research design. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7059618/ /pubmed/32180753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00324 Text en Copyright © 2020 McFerran, Lai, Chang, Acquaro, Chin, Stokes and Crooke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
McFerran, Katrina Skewes
Lai, Hsin I. Cindy
Chang, Wei-Han
Acquaro, Daniela
Chin, Tan Chyuan
Stokes, Helen
Crooke, Alexander Hew Dale
Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature
title Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature
title_full Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature
title_fullStr Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature
title_full_unstemmed Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature
title_short Music, Rhythm and Trauma: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Research Literature
title_sort music, rhythm and trauma: a critical interpretive synthesis of research literature
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32180753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00324
work_keys_str_mv AT mcferrankatrinaskewes musicrhythmandtraumaacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofresearchliterature
AT laihsinicindy musicrhythmandtraumaacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofresearchliterature
AT changweihan musicrhythmandtraumaacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofresearchliterature
AT acquarodaniela musicrhythmandtraumaacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofresearchliterature
AT chintanchyuan musicrhythmandtraumaacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofresearchliterature
AT stokeshelen musicrhythmandtraumaacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofresearchliterature
AT crookealexanderhewdale musicrhythmandtraumaacriticalinterpretivesynthesisofresearchliterature