Cargando…

Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023)

OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of a randomized controlled study design comparing epidural analgesia (EDA) with continuous wound infiltration (CWI) in respect to postoperative complications and mobility to design a future multicentre randomized controlled trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: CW...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klotz, Rosa, Seide, Svenja E., Knebel, Phillip, Probst, Pascal, Bruckner, Thomas, Motsch, Johann, Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander, Böckler, Dittmar, Larmann, Jan, Diener, Markus K., Weigand, Markus A., Büchler, Markus W., Mihaljevic, Andre L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229898
_version_ 1783504143606874112
author Klotz, Rosa
Seide, Svenja E.
Knebel, Phillip
Probst, Pascal
Bruckner, Thomas
Motsch, Johann
Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander
Böckler, Dittmar
Larmann, Jan
Diener, Markus K.
Weigand, Markus A.
Büchler, Markus W.
Mihaljevic, Andre L.
author_facet Klotz, Rosa
Seide, Svenja E.
Knebel, Phillip
Probst, Pascal
Bruckner, Thomas
Motsch, Johann
Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander
Böckler, Dittmar
Larmann, Jan
Diener, Markus K.
Weigand, Markus A.
Büchler, Markus W.
Mihaljevic, Andre L.
author_sort Klotz, Rosa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of a randomized controlled study design comparing epidural analgesia (EDA) with continuous wound infiltration (CWI) in respect to postoperative complications and mobility to design a future multicentre randomized controlled trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: CWI has been developed to address drawbacks of EDA. Previous studies have established the equivalent analgesic potential of CWI compared to EDA. This is a single centre, non-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial at a tertiary surgical centre. Patients undergoing elective non-colorectal surgery via a midline laparotomy were randomized to EDA or CWI. Endpoints included recruitment, feasibility of assessing postoperative mobility with a pedometer and morbidity. No primary endpoint was defined and all analyses were explorative. INTERVENTIONS: CWI with local anaesthetics (experimental group) vs. thoracic EDA (control). RESULTS: Of 846 patients screened within 14 months, 71 were randomized and 62 (31 per group) included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mobility was assessed in 44 of 62 patients and revealed no differences within the first 3 postoperative days. Overall morbidity did not differ between the two groups (measured via the comprehensive complication index). Median pain scores at rest were comparable between the two groups, while EDA was superior in pain treatment during movement on the first, but not on the second and third postoperative day. Duration of preoperative induction of anaesthesia was shorter with CWI than with EDA. Of 17 serious adverse events, 3 were potentially related to EDA, while none was related to CWI. CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed the feasibility of a randomized trial design to compare CWI and EDA regarding morbidity. Improvements in the education and training of team members are necessary to improve recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00008023.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7059935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70599352020-03-12 Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023) Klotz, Rosa Seide, Svenja E. Knebel, Phillip Probst, Pascal Bruckner, Thomas Motsch, Johann Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander Böckler, Dittmar Larmann, Jan Diener, Markus K. Weigand, Markus A. Büchler, Markus W. Mihaljevic, Andre L. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of a randomized controlled study design comparing epidural analgesia (EDA) with continuous wound infiltration (CWI) in respect to postoperative complications and mobility to design a future multicentre randomized controlled trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: CWI has been developed to address drawbacks of EDA. Previous studies have established the equivalent analgesic potential of CWI compared to EDA. This is a single centre, non-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial at a tertiary surgical centre. Patients undergoing elective non-colorectal surgery via a midline laparotomy were randomized to EDA or CWI. Endpoints included recruitment, feasibility of assessing postoperative mobility with a pedometer and morbidity. No primary endpoint was defined and all analyses were explorative. INTERVENTIONS: CWI with local anaesthetics (experimental group) vs. thoracic EDA (control). RESULTS: Of 846 patients screened within 14 months, 71 were randomized and 62 (31 per group) included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mobility was assessed in 44 of 62 patients and revealed no differences within the first 3 postoperative days. Overall morbidity did not differ between the two groups (measured via the comprehensive complication index). Median pain scores at rest were comparable between the two groups, while EDA was superior in pain treatment during movement on the first, but not on the second and third postoperative day. Duration of preoperative induction of anaesthesia was shorter with CWI than with EDA. Of 17 serious adverse events, 3 were potentially related to EDA, while none was related to CWI. CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed the feasibility of a randomized trial design to compare CWI and EDA regarding morbidity. Improvements in the education and training of team members are necessary to improve recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00008023. Public Library of Science 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7059935/ /pubmed/32142529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229898 Text en © 2020 Klotz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klotz, Rosa
Seide, Svenja E.
Knebel, Phillip
Probst, Pascal
Bruckner, Thomas
Motsch, Johann
Hyhlik-Dürr, Alexander
Böckler, Dittmar
Larmann, Jan
Diener, Markus K.
Weigand, Markus A.
Büchler, Markus W.
Mihaljevic, Andre L.
Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023)
title Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023)
title_full Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023)
title_fullStr Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023)
title_full_unstemmed Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023)
title_short Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023)
title_sort continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions – a randomized-controlled pilot trial (painless-pilot trial; drks number: drks00008023)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229898
work_keys_str_mv AT klotzrosa continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT seidesvenjae continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT knebelphillip continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT probstpascal continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT brucknerthomas continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT motschjohann continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT hyhlikdurralexander continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT bocklerdittmar continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT larmannjan continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT dienermarkusk continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT weigandmarkusa continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT buchlermarkusw continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023
AT mihaljevicandrel continuouswoundinfiltrationversusepiduralanalgesiaformidlineabdominalincisionsarandomizedcontrolledpilottrialpainlesspilottrialdrksnumberdrks00008023