Cargando…
Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease
BACKGROUND: Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed. METHODS: Patients with iGBC were identif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4 |
_version_ | 1783504169909354496 |
---|---|
author | de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. van der Geest, Lydia G. de Bitter, Tessa J. J. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M. van den Boezem, Peter van der Post, Chella S. de Reuver, Philip R. |
author_facet | de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. van der Geest, Lydia G. de Bitter, Tessa J. J. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M. van den Boezem, Peter van der Post, Chella S. de Reuver, Philip R. |
author_sort | de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed. METHODS: Patients with iGBC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and pathology reports of re-resected patients were reviewed. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 463 patients were included; 24% (n = 110) underwent re-resection after a median interval of 66 days. RD was present in 35% of patients and was most frequently found in the lymph nodes (23%). R0 resection was achieved in 93 patients (92%). Median overall survival (OS) of patients without re-resection was 13.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–15.6), compared with 52.6 months (95% CI 36.3–68.8) in re-resected patients (p < 0.001). After re-resection, median OS was superior in patients without RD versus patients with RD (not reached vs. 23.1 months; p < 0.001). In patients who underwent re-resection, RD in the liver (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54; p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (HR 2.35; p = 0.005) were the only significant prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Predictive factors for the presence of RD were pT3 stage (HR 25.3; p = 0.003) and pN1 stage (HR 23.0; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Re-resection for iGBC is associated with improved survival but remains infrequently used and is often performed after the optimal timing interval. RD is the only significant prognostic factor for survival after re-resection and can be predicted by pT and pN stages. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7060151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70601512020-03-23 Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. van der Geest, Lydia G. de Bitter, Tessa J. J. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M. van den Boezem, Peter van der Post, Chella S. de Reuver, Philip R. Ann Surg Oncol Hepatobiliary Tumors BACKGROUND: Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed. METHODS: Patients with iGBC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and pathology reports of re-resected patients were reviewed. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 463 patients were included; 24% (n = 110) underwent re-resection after a median interval of 66 days. RD was present in 35% of patients and was most frequently found in the lymph nodes (23%). R0 resection was achieved in 93 patients (92%). Median overall survival (OS) of patients without re-resection was 13.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–15.6), compared with 52.6 months (95% CI 36.3–68.8) in re-resected patients (p < 0.001). After re-resection, median OS was superior in patients without RD versus patients with RD (not reached vs. 23.1 months; p < 0.001). In patients who underwent re-resection, RD in the liver (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54; p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (HR 2.35; p = 0.005) were the only significant prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Predictive factors for the presence of RD were pT3 stage (HR 25.3; p = 0.003) and pN1 stage (HR 23.0; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Re-resection for iGBC is associated with improved survival but remains infrequently used and is often performed after the optimal timing interval. RD is the only significant prognostic factor for survival after re-resection and can be predicted by pT and pN stages. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7060151/ /pubmed/31741109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Hepatobiliary Tumors de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. van der Geest, Lydia G. de Bitter, Tessa J. J. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M. van den Boezem, Peter van der Post, Chella S. de Reuver, Philip R. Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease |
title | Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease |
title_full | Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease |
title_fullStr | Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease |
title_short | Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease |
title_sort | re-resection in incidental gallbladder cancer: survival and the incidence of residual disease |
topic | Hepatobiliary Tumors |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desavorninlohmaneliseaj reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease AT vandergeestlydiag reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease AT debittertessajj reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease AT nagtegaalirisd reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease AT vanlaarhovencornelisjhm reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease AT vandenboezempeter reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease AT vanderpostchellas reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease AT dereuverphilipr reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease |