Cargando…

Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease

BACKGROUND: Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed. METHODS: Patients with iGBC were identif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J., van der Geest, Lydia G., de Bitter, Tessa J. J., Nagtegaal, Iris D., van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M., van den Boezem, Peter, van der Post, Chella S., de Reuver, Philip R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4
_version_ 1783504169909354496
author de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
van der Geest, Lydia G.
de Bitter, Tessa J. J.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M.
van den Boezem, Peter
van der Post, Chella S.
de Reuver, Philip R.
author_facet de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
van der Geest, Lydia G.
de Bitter, Tessa J. J.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M.
van den Boezem, Peter
van der Post, Chella S.
de Reuver, Philip R.
author_sort de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed. METHODS: Patients with iGBC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and pathology reports of re-resected patients were reviewed. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 463 patients were included; 24% (n = 110) underwent re-resection after a median interval of 66 days. RD was present in 35% of patients and was most frequently found in the lymph nodes (23%). R0 resection was achieved in 93 patients (92%). Median overall survival (OS) of patients without re-resection was 13.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–15.6), compared with 52.6 months (95% CI 36.3–68.8) in re-resected patients (p < 0.001). After re-resection, median OS was superior in patients without RD versus patients with RD (not reached vs. 23.1 months; p < 0.001). In patients who underwent re-resection, RD in the liver (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54; p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (HR 2.35; p = 0.005) were the only significant prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Predictive factors for the presence of RD were pT3 stage (HR 25.3; p = 0.003) and pN1 stage (HR 23.0; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Re-resection for iGBC is associated with improved survival but remains infrequently used and is often performed after the optimal timing interval. RD is the only significant prognostic factor for survival after re-resection and can be predicted by pT and pN stages. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7060151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70601512020-03-23 Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J. van der Geest, Lydia G. de Bitter, Tessa J. J. Nagtegaal, Iris D. van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M. van den Boezem, Peter van der Post, Chella S. de Reuver, Philip R. Ann Surg Oncol Hepatobiliary Tumors BACKGROUND: Re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is associated with improved survival but little is known about residual disease (RD) and prognostic factors. In this study, survival after re-resection, RD, and prognostic factors are analyzed. METHODS: Patients with iGBC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and pathology reports of re-resected patients were reviewed. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 463 patients were included; 24% (n = 110) underwent re-resection after a median interval of 66 days. RD was present in 35% of patients and was most frequently found in the lymph nodes (23%). R0 resection was achieved in 93 patients (92%). Median overall survival (OS) of patients without re-resection was 13.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.6–15.6), compared with 52.6 months (95% CI 36.3–68.8) in re-resected patients (p < 0.001). After re-resection, median OS was superior in patients without RD versus patients with RD (not reached vs. 23.1 months; p < 0.001). In patients who underwent re-resection, RD in the liver (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54; p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (HR 2.35; p = 0.005) were the only significant prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Predictive factors for the presence of RD were pT3 stage (HR 25.3; p = 0.003) and pN1 stage (HR 23.0; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Re-resection for iGBC is associated with improved survival but remains infrequently used and is often performed after the optimal timing interval. RD is the only significant prognostic factor for survival after re-resection and can be predicted by pT and pN stages. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7060151/ /pubmed/31741109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Hepatobiliary Tumors
de Savornin Lohman, Elise A. J.
van der Geest, Lydia G.
de Bitter, Tessa J. J.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H. M.
van den Boezem, Peter
van der Post, Chella S.
de Reuver, Philip R.
Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease
title Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease
title_full Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease
title_fullStr Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease
title_full_unstemmed Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease
title_short Re-resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Survival and the Incidence of Residual Disease
title_sort re-resection in incidental gallbladder cancer: survival and the incidence of residual disease
topic Hepatobiliary Tumors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31741109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08074-4
work_keys_str_mv AT desavorninlohmaneliseaj reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease
AT vandergeestlydiag reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease
AT debittertessajj reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease
AT nagtegaalirisd reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease
AT vanlaarhovencornelisjhm reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease
AT vandenboezempeter reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease
AT vanderpostchellas reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease
AT dereuverphilipr reresectioninincidentalgallbladdercancersurvivalandtheincidenceofresidualdisease