Cargando…

A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls

BACKGROUND: Partners of young breast cancer survivors (BCS) are at increased risk for deficits in quality of life (QoL). To intervene effectively, it is important to understand how the breast cancer experience impacts partners. The purpose of this study was to compare QoL between partners of young B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohee, Andrea, Storey, Susan, Winger, Joseph G., Cella, David, Stump, Timothy, Monahan, Patrick O., Champion, Victoria L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32144626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-0184-4
_version_ 1783504204435816448
author Cohee, Andrea
Storey, Susan
Winger, Joseph G.
Cella, David
Stump, Timothy
Monahan, Patrick O.
Champion, Victoria L.
author_facet Cohee, Andrea
Storey, Susan
Winger, Joseph G.
Cella, David
Stump, Timothy
Monahan, Patrick O.
Champion, Victoria L.
author_sort Cohee, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Partners of young breast cancer survivors (BCS) are at increased risk for deficits in quality of life (QoL). To intervene effectively, it is important to understand how the breast cancer experience impacts partners. The purpose of this study was to compare QoL between partners of young BCS and partners of healthy acquaintance controls. METHODS: Partners of young BCS (3–8 years post treatment and ≤ 45 years old at diagnosis) and partners of age-matched healthy acquaintance controls completed questionnaires on overall, physical (physical function, sexual difficulty), social (personal resources, sexual enjoyment, marital satisfaction, partner social support, social constraints, parenting satisfaction), psychological (depressive symptoms), and spiritual (behaviors, beliefs, and activities) QoL. Analyses included descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA to compare partner groups on all study variables. RESULTS: Although partners of young BCS (n = 227) reported fewer social constraints (p < .001), they reported lower overall QoL (p < .001), fewer personal resources (p < .001), more sexual difficulty (p = .019), less sexual enjoyment (p = .002), less marital satisfaction (p = .019), more depressive symptoms (p = .024), and fewer spiritual behaviors (p < .001), beliefs (p = .001) and activities (p = .003) compared to partners of healthy acquaintance controls (n = 170). Additional analysis showed that perceptions that the relationship changed for the better since cancer, social constraints, partner social support, and depression predicted marital satisfaction among partners of young BCS. CONCLUSIONS: Partners of young BCS are at risk for poorer overall, physical, social, psychological, and spiritual QoL compared to partners of healthy women. Interventions targeting QoL domains may enable partners to effectively support their partner and improve their QoL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7060298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70602982020-03-23 A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls Cohee, Andrea Storey, Susan Winger, Joseph G. Cella, David Stump, Timothy Monahan, Patrick O. Champion, Victoria L. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Partners of young breast cancer survivors (BCS) are at increased risk for deficits in quality of life (QoL). To intervene effectively, it is important to understand how the breast cancer experience impacts partners. The purpose of this study was to compare QoL between partners of young BCS and partners of healthy acquaintance controls. METHODS: Partners of young BCS (3–8 years post treatment and ≤ 45 years old at diagnosis) and partners of age-matched healthy acquaintance controls completed questionnaires on overall, physical (physical function, sexual difficulty), social (personal resources, sexual enjoyment, marital satisfaction, partner social support, social constraints, parenting satisfaction), psychological (depressive symptoms), and spiritual (behaviors, beliefs, and activities) QoL. Analyses included descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA to compare partner groups on all study variables. RESULTS: Although partners of young BCS (n = 227) reported fewer social constraints (p < .001), they reported lower overall QoL (p < .001), fewer personal resources (p < .001), more sexual difficulty (p = .019), less sexual enjoyment (p = .002), less marital satisfaction (p = .019), more depressive symptoms (p = .024), and fewer spiritual behaviors (p < .001), beliefs (p = .001) and activities (p = .003) compared to partners of healthy acquaintance controls (n = 170). Additional analysis showed that perceptions that the relationship changed for the better since cancer, social constraints, partner social support, and depression predicted marital satisfaction among partners of young BCS. CONCLUSIONS: Partners of young BCS are at risk for poorer overall, physical, social, psychological, and spiritual QoL compared to partners of healthy women. Interventions targeting QoL domains may enable partners to effectively support their partner and improve their QoL. Springer International Publishing 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7060298/ /pubmed/32144626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-0184-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Cohee, Andrea
Storey, Susan
Winger, Joseph G.
Cella, David
Stump, Timothy
Monahan, Patrick O.
Champion, Victoria L.
A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls
title A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls
title_full A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls
title_fullStr A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls
title_full_unstemmed A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls
title_short A cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls
title_sort cohort study of quality of life in partners of young breast cancer survivors compared to partners of healthy controls
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32144626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-0184-4
work_keys_str_mv AT coheeandrea acohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT storeysusan acohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT wingerjosephg acohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT celladavid acohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT stumptimothy acohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT monahanpatricko acohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT championvictorial acohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT coheeandrea cohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT storeysusan cohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT wingerjosephg cohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT celladavid cohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT stumptimothy cohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT monahanpatricko cohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols
AT championvictorial cohortstudyofqualityoflifeinpartnersofyoungbreastcancersurvivorscomparedtopartnersofhealthycontrols