Cargando…

Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes

Connectivity of social-ecological systems promotes resilience across urban landscapes. Community gardens are social-ecological systems that support food production, social interactions, and biodiversity conservation. We investigate how these hubs of ecosystem services facilitate socio-ecological con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egerer, Monika, Fouch, Nakisha, Anderson, Elsa C., Clarke, Mysha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32144391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61230-9
_version_ 1783504213327740928
author Egerer, Monika
Fouch, Nakisha
Anderson, Elsa C.
Clarke, Mysha
author_facet Egerer, Monika
Fouch, Nakisha
Anderson, Elsa C.
Clarke, Mysha
author_sort Egerer, Monika
collection PubMed
description Connectivity of social-ecological systems promotes resilience across urban landscapes. Community gardens are social-ecological systems that support food production, social interactions, and biodiversity conservation. We investigate how these hubs of ecosystem services facilitate socio-ecological connectivity and service flows as a network across complex urban landscapes. In three US cities (Baltimore, Chicago, New York City), we use community garden networks as a model system to demonstrate how biophysical and social features of urban landscapes control the pattern and magnitude of ecosystem service flows through these systems. We show that community gardens within a city are connected through biological and social mechanisms, and connectivity levels and spatial arrangement differ across cities. We found that biophysical connectivity was higher than social connectivity in one case study, while they were nearly equal in the other two. This higher social connectivity can be attributed to clustered distributions of gardens within neighborhoods (network modularity), which promotes neighborhood-scale connectivity hotspots, but produces landscape-scale connectivity coldspots. The particular patterns illustrate how urban form and social amenities largely shape ecosystem service flows among garden networks. Such socio-ecological analyses can be applied to enhance and stabilize landscape connectedness to improve life and resilience in cities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7060339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70603392020-03-18 Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes Egerer, Monika Fouch, Nakisha Anderson, Elsa C. Clarke, Mysha Sci Rep Article Connectivity of social-ecological systems promotes resilience across urban landscapes. Community gardens are social-ecological systems that support food production, social interactions, and biodiversity conservation. We investigate how these hubs of ecosystem services facilitate socio-ecological connectivity and service flows as a network across complex urban landscapes. In three US cities (Baltimore, Chicago, New York City), we use community garden networks as a model system to demonstrate how biophysical and social features of urban landscapes control the pattern and magnitude of ecosystem service flows through these systems. We show that community gardens within a city are connected through biological and social mechanisms, and connectivity levels and spatial arrangement differ across cities. We found that biophysical connectivity was higher than social connectivity in one case study, while they were nearly equal in the other two. This higher social connectivity can be attributed to clustered distributions of gardens within neighborhoods (network modularity), which promotes neighborhood-scale connectivity hotspots, but produces landscape-scale connectivity coldspots. The particular patterns illustrate how urban form and social amenities largely shape ecosystem service flows among garden networks. Such socio-ecological analyses can be applied to enhance and stabilize landscape connectedness to improve life and resilience in cities. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7060339/ /pubmed/32144391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61230-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Egerer, Monika
Fouch, Nakisha
Anderson, Elsa C.
Clarke, Mysha
Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes
title Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes
title_full Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes
title_fullStr Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes
title_full_unstemmed Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes
title_short Socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes
title_sort socio-ecological connectivity differs in magnitude and direction across urban landscapes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32144391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61230-9
work_keys_str_mv AT egerermonika socioecologicalconnectivitydiffersinmagnitudeanddirectionacrossurbanlandscapes
AT fouchnakisha socioecologicalconnectivitydiffersinmagnitudeanddirectionacrossurbanlandscapes
AT andersonelsac socioecologicalconnectivitydiffersinmagnitudeanddirectionacrossurbanlandscapes
AT clarkemysha socioecologicalconnectivitydiffersinmagnitudeanddirectionacrossurbanlandscapes