Cargando…

Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial

BACKGROUND: For many disease areas, there are often treatments in different stages of the development process. We consider the design of a two-arm parallel group trial where it is planned to add a new experimental treatment arm during the trial. This could potentially save money, patients, time and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett, Maxine, Mander, Adrian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4073-1
_version_ 1783504271844573184
author Bennett, Maxine
Mander, Adrian P.
author_facet Bennett, Maxine
Mander, Adrian P.
author_sort Bennett, Maxine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For many disease areas, there are often treatments in different stages of the development process. We consider the design of a two-arm parallel group trial where it is planned to add a new experimental treatment arm during the trial. This could potentially save money, patients, time and resources; however, the addition of a treatment arm creates a multiple comparison problem. Current practice in trials when a new treatment arm has been added is to compare the new treatment only to controls randomised concurrently, and this is the setting we consider here. Furthermore, for standard multi-arm trials, optimal allocation randomises a larger number of patients to the control arm than to each experimental treatment arm. METHODS: In this paper we propose an adaptive design, the aim of which is to adapt the sample size of the trial when the new treatment arm is added to control the family-wise error rate (FWER) in the strong sense, whilst maintaining the marginal power of each treatment-to-control comparison at the level of the original study. We explore optimal allocation for designs where a treatment arm is added with the aim of increasing the overall power of the study, where we define the overall power to be the probability of detecting all treatments that are better than the control. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: An increase in sample size is required to maintain the marginal power for each pairwise comparison when adding a treatment arm if control of the FWER is required at the level of the type I error in the original study. When control of the FWER is required in a single trial which adds an additional experimental treatment arm, but control of the FWER is not required in separate trials, depending on the design characteristics, it may be better to run a separate trial for each experimental treatment, in terms of the number of patients required. An increase in overall power can be achieved when optimal allocation is used once a treatment arm has been added to the trial, rather than continuing with equal allocation to all treatment arms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7060622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70606222020-03-12 Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial Bennett, Maxine Mander, Adrian P. Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: For many disease areas, there are often treatments in different stages of the development process. We consider the design of a two-arm parallel group trial where it is planned to add a new experimental treatment arm during the trial. This could potentially save money, patients, time and resources; however, the addition of a treatment arm creates a multiple comparison problem. Current practice in trials when a new treatment arm has been added is to compare the new treatment only to controls randomised concurrently, and this is the setting we consider here. Furthermore, for standard multi-arm trials, optimal allocation randomises a larger number of patients to the control arm than to each experimental treatment arm. METHODS: In this paper we propose an adaptive design, the aim of which is to adapt the sample size of the trial when the new treatment arm is added to control the family-wise error rate (FWER) in the strong sense, whilst maintaining the marginal power of each treatment-to-control comparison at the level of the original study. We explore optimal allocation for designs where a treatment arm is added with the aim of increasing the overall power of the study, where we define the overall power to be the probability of detecting all treatments that are better than the control. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: An increase in sample size is required to maintain the marginal power for each pairwise comparison when adding a treatment arm if control of the FWER is required at the level of the type I error in the original study. When control of the FWER is required in a single trial which adds an additional experimental treatment arm, but control of the FWER is not required in separate trials, depending on the design characteristics, it may be better to run a separate trial for each experimental treatment, in terms of the number of patients required. An increase in overall power can be achieved when optimal allocation is used once a treatment arm has been added to the trial, rather than continuing with equal allocation to all treatment arms. BioMed Central 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7060622/ /pubmed/32143729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4073-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Bennett, Maxine
Mander, Adrian P.
Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial
title Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial
title_full Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial
title_fullStr Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial
title_short Designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial
title_sort designs for adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7060622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4073-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bennettmaxine designsforaddingatreatmentarmtoanongoingclinicaltrial
AT manderadrianp designsforaddingatreatmentarmtoanongoingclinicaltrial