Cargando…

Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. METHODS: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Geun Joo, Oh, Hyoung-Chul, Seong, Hee-Kyeong, Kim, Jeong Wook, Ko, Jin Soo, Kang, Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.319
_version_ 1783504332700778496
author Choi, Geun Joo
Oh, Hyoung-Chul
Seong, Hee-Kyeong
Kim, Jeong Wook
Ko, Jin Soo
Kang, Hyun
author_facet Choi, Geun Joo
Oh, Hyoung-Chul
Seong, Hee-Kyeong
Kim, Jeong Wook
Ko, Jin Soo
Kang, Hyun
author_sort Choi, Geun Joo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. METHODS: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. The sedative and analgesic doses required, discomfort and satisfaction scores, procedure time, recovery time, adenoma detection rate, and failed cecal intubation were evaluated. Adverse effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular complications, were also assessed. RESULTS: We included six studies, with 1,848 patients in total. The requirement for sedative treatment was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (standardized mean difference [SMD], –0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.54 to –0.24; p = 0.12; I(2) = 49%). Discomfort, scored by patients during the EGD procedure, was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.45; 95% CI, –0.80 to –0.09; p = 0.02; I(2) = 73%), while it was comparable during colonoscopy between the two sequences. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.47; 95% CI, –0.65 to –0.30; p = 0.28; I(2) = 21%). Total procedure duration, EGD, colonoscopy, cecal intubation time and incidence, incidences of pathologic findings, and adenoma detection were comparable between the two sequences. There was no significant difference in the incidences of desaturation, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia between the two sequences. CONCLUSIONS: When conducting same-day bidirectional endoscopy, EGD followed by colonoscopy is the most beneficial sequence to be used because patients require lower sedative doses, recover faster, and report lesser discomfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7061013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70610132020-03-16 Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Hyoung-Chul Seong, Hee-Kyeong Kim, Jeong Wook Ko, Jin Soo Kang, Hyun Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. METHODS: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. The sedative and analgesic doses required, discomfort and satisfaction scores, procedure time, recovery time, adenoma detection rate, and failed cecal intubation were evaluated. Adverse effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular complications, were also assessed. RESULTS: We included six studies, with 1,848 patients in total. The requirement for sedative treatment was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (standardized mean difference [SMD], –0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.54 to –0.24; p = 0.12; I(2) = 49%). Discomfort, scored by patients during the EGD procedure, was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.45; 95% CI, –0.80 to –0.09; p = 0.02; I(2) = 73%), while it was comparable during colonoscopy between the two sequences. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.47; 95% CI, –0.65 to –0.30; p = 0.28; I(2) = 21%). Total procedure duration, EGD, colonoscopy, cecal intubation time and incidence, incidences of pathologic findings, and adenoma detection were comparable between the two sequences. There was no significant difference in the incidences of desaturation, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia between the two sequences. CONCLUSIONS: When conducting same-day bidirectional endoscopy, EGD followed by colonoscopy is the most beneficial sequence to be used because patients require lower sedative doses, recover faster, and report lesser discomfort. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020-03 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7061013/ /pubmed/31875664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.319 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Geun Joo
Oh, Hyoung-Chul
Seong, Hee-Kyeong
Kim, Jeong Wook
Ko, Jin Soo
Kang, Hyun
Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875664
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.319
work_keys_str_mv AT choigeunjoo comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ohhyoungchul comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT seongheekyeong comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimjeongwook comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kojinsoo comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kanghyun comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis