Cargando…
Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. METHODS: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.319 |
_version_ | 1783504332700778496 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Hyoung-Chul Seong, Hee-Kyeong Kim, Jeong Wook Ko, Jin Soo Kang, Hyun |
author_facet | Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Hyoung-Chul Seong, Hee-Kyeong Kim, Jeong Wook Ko, Jin Soo Kang, Hyun |
author_sort | Choi, Geun Joo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. METHODS: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. The sedative and analgesic doses required, discomfort and satisfaction scores, procedure time, recovery time, adenoma detection rate, and failed cecal intubation were evaluated. Adverse effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular complications, were also assessed. RESULTS: We included six studies, with 1,848 patients in total. The requirement for sedative treatment was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (standardized mean difference [SMD], –0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.54 to –0.24; p = 0.12; I(2) = 49%). Discomfort, scored by patients during the EGD procedure, was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.45; 95% CI, –0.80 to –0.09; p = 0.02; I(2) = 73%), while it was comparable during colonoscopy between the two sequences. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.47; 95% CI, –0.65 to –0.30; p = 0.28; I(2) = 21%). Total procedure duration, EGD, colonoscopy, cecal intubation time and incidence, incidences of pathologic findings, and adenoma detection were comparable between the two sequences. There was no significant difference in the incidences of desaturation, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia between the two sequences. CONCLUSIONS: When conducting same-day bidirectional endoscopy, EGD followed by colonoscopy is the most beneficial sequence to be used because patients require lower sedative doses, recover faster, and report lesser discomfort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7061013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70610132020-03-16 Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Hyoung-Chul Seong, Hee-Kyeong Kim, Jeong Wook Ko, Jin Soo Kang, Hyun Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. METHODS: We searched OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the procedural sequences in same-day bidirectional endoscopy, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. The sedative and analgesic doses required, discomfort and satisfaction scores, procedure time, recovery time, adenoma detection rate, and failed cecal intubation were evaluated. Adverse effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular complications, were also assessed. RESULTS: We included six studies, with 1,848 patients in total. The requirement for sedative treatment was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (standardized mean difference [SMD], –0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.54 to –0.24; p = 0.12; I(2) = 49%). Discomfort, scored by patients during the EGD procedure, was significantly lesser in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.45; 95% CI, –0.80 to –0.09; p = 0.02; I(2) = 73%), while it was comparable during colonoscopy between the two sequences. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the EGD-colonoscopy sequence than in the colonoscopy-EGD sequence (SMD, –0.47; 95% CI, –0.65 to –0.30; p = 0.28; I(2) = 21%). Total procedure duration, EGD, colonoscopy, cecal intubation time and incidence, incidences of pathologic findings, and adenoma detection were comparable between the two sequences. There was no significant difference in the incidences of desaturation, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and tachycardia between the two sequences. CONCLUSIONS: When conducting same-day bidirectional endoscopy, EGD followed by colonoscopy is the most beneficial sequence to be used because patients require lower sedative doses, recover faster, and report lesser discomfort. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2020-03 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7061013/ /pubmed/31875664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.319 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choi, Geun Joo Oh, Hyoung-Chul Seong, Hee-Kyeong Kim, Jeong Wook Ko, Jin Soo Kang, Hyun Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875664 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choigeunjoo comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ohhyoungchul comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT seongheekyeong comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimjeongwook comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kojinsoo comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kanghyun comparisonofproceduralsequenceinsamedaybidirectionalendoscopyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |