Cargando…
Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease?
BACKGROUND: Radioiodine represents a cost-effective treatment option for Graves’ disease. In the UK, it is traditionally reserved for patients who relapse after initial thionamide therapy. In a change from current practice, the new guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13044-020-00077-8 |
_version_ | 1783504395148722176 |
---|---|
author | Okosieme, Onyebuchi E. Taylor, Peter N. Dayan, Colin M. |
author_facet | Okosieme, Onyebuchi E. Taylor, Peter N. Dayan, Colin M. |
author_sort | Okosieme, Onyebuchi E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Radioiodine represents a cost-effective treatment option for Graves’ disease. In the UK, it is traditionally reserved for patients who relapse after initial thionamide therapy. In a change from current practice, the new guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that radioiodine should now be first line therapy for Graves’ disease. However, the safety of radioiodine with respect to long-term mortality risk has been the subject of recent debate. This analysis examines evidence from treatment related mortality studies in hyperthyroidism and discusses their implications for future Graves’ disease treatment strategies. MAIN BODY: Some studies have suggested an excess mortality in radioiodine treated cohorts compared to the background population. In particular, a recent observational study reported a modest increase in cancer-related mortality in hyperthyroid patients exposed to radioiodine. The interpretation of these studies is however constrained by study designs that lacked thionamide control groups or information on thyroid status and so could not distinguish the effect of treatment from disease. Two studies have shown survival advantages of radioiodine over thionamide therapy, but these benefits were only seen when radioiodine was successful in controlling hyperthyroidism. Notably, increased mortality was associated with uncontrolled hyperthyroidism irrespective of therapy modality. CONCLUSIONS: Early radioiodine treatment will potentially reduce mortality and should be offered to patients with severe disease. However, thionamides are still suitable for patients with milder disease, contraindications to radioiodine, or individuals who choose to avoid permanent hypothyroidism. Ultimately, a patient individualised approach that prioritises early and sustained control of hyperthyroidism will improve long-term outcomes regardless of the therapy modality used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7061474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70614742020-03-12 Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease? Okosieme, Onyebuchi E. Taylor, Peter N. Dayan, Colin M. Thyroid Res Commentary BACKGROUND: Radioiodine represents a cost-effective treatment option for Graves’ disease. In the UK, it is traditionally reserved for patients who relapse after initial thionamide therapy. In a change from current practice, the new guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that radioiodine should now be first line therapy for Graves’ disease. However, the safety of radioiodine with respect to long-term mortality risk has been the subject of recent debate. This analysis examines evidence from treatment related mortality studies in hyperthyroidism and discusses their implications for future Graves’ disease treatment strategies. MAIN BODY: Some studies have suggested an excess mortality in radioiodine treated cohorts compared to the background population. In particular, a recent observational study reported a modest increase in cancer-related mortality in hyperthyroid patients exposed to radioiodine. The interpretation of these studies is however constrained by study designs that lacked thionamide control groups or information on thyroid status and so could not distinguish the effect of treatment from disease. Two studies have shown survival advantages of radioiodine over thionamide therapy, but these benefits were only seen when radioiodine was successful in controlling hyperthyroidism. Notably, increased mortality was associated with uncontrolled hyperthyroidism irrespective of therapy modality. CONCLUSIONS: Early radioiodine treatment will potentially reduce mortality and should be offered to patients with severe disease. However, thionamides are still suitable for patients with milder disease, contraindications to radioiodine, or individuals who choose to avoid permanent hypothyroidism. Ultimately, a patient individualised approach that prioritises early and sustained control of hyperthyroidism will improve long-term outcomes regardless of the therapy modality used. BioMed Central 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7061474/ /pubmed/32165924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13044-020-00077-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Okosieme, Onyebuchi E. Taylor, Peter N. Dayan, Colin M. Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease? |
title | Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease? |
title_full | Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease? |
title_fullStr | Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease? |
title_short | Should radioiodine now be first line treatment for Graves’ disease? |
title_sort | should radioiodine now be first line treatment for graves’ disease? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13044-020-00077-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okosiemeonyebuchie shouldradioiodinenowbefirstlinetreatmentforgravesdisease AT taylorpetern shouldradioiodinenowbefirstlinetreatmentforgravesdisease AT dayancolinm shouldradioiodinenowbefirstlinetreatmentforgravesdisease |