Cargando…

Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of published patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) based breast reconstruction. This cohort study reviewed our clinical outcomes and PROMs. METHODS: All patients undergoing mastectomy with ADM assisted immediate breast re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell-Brett, S., Goh, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2018.06.006
_version_ 1783504407157014528
author Powell-Brett, S.
Goh, S.
author_facet Powell-Brett, S.
Goh, S.
author_sort Powell-Brett, S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of published patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) based breast reconstruction. This cohort study reviewed our clinical outcomes and PROMs. METHODS: All patients undergoing mastectomy with ADM assisted immediate breast reconstruction under a single surgeon between June 2013 and June 2017 were included. A prospectively kept database, clinic letters and operation notes were analysed. All patients received BREAST-Q(TM) pre and post-operative questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients with 77 reconstructions were included. Mean hospital stay was 3.3 days. All patients received 48 h of intravenous antibiotics, followed by a two-week course of oral antibiotics. Mean post-operative follow up was 17 months. There were 8 cases of skin necrosis (10.4%), and 1 infection (1.3%). These resulted in 4 explantations (5.2%); 3 following skin necrosis and 1 following infection. There was no observed ‘red skin’ syndrome. Post-operative mean score for ‘satisfaction with outcome’ was 83.1%. Mean score for ‘Psychosocial well-being’ was 70.7% and the mean score for ‘physical well-being’ was 77.9%. CONCLUSION: Our complication rates were comparable to those published, and PROMs were consistently good. The skin necrosis rate was potentially due to earlier practice of performing single-stage immediate reconstruction using fixed volume breast implants. We have modified our patient selection criteria and ADM based reconstructive techniques with experience. Longer term clinical and patient reported outcome should be sought.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7061540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70615402020-03-10 Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix Powell-Brett, S. Goh, S. JPRAS Open Original Article INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of published patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) based breast reconstruction. This cohort study reviewed our clinical outcomes and PROMs. METHODS: All patients undergoing mastectomy with ADM assisted immediate breast reconstruction under a single surgeon between June 2013 and June 2017 were included. A prospectively kept database, clinic letters and operation notes were analysed. All patients received BREAST-Q(TM) pre and post-operative questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients with 77 reconstructions were included. Mean hospital stay was 3.3 days. All patients received 48 h of intravenous antibiotics, followed by a two-week course of oral antibiotics. Mean post-operative follow up was 17 months. There were 8 cases of skin necrosis (10.4%), and 1 infection (1.3%). These resulted in 4 explantations (5.2%); 3 following skin necrosis and 1 following infection. There was no observed ‘red skin’ syndrome. Post-operative mean score for ‘satisfaction with outcome’ was 83.1%. Mean score for ‘Psychosocial well-being’ was 70.7% and the mean score for ‘physical well-being’ was 77.9%. CONCLUSION: Our complication rates were comparable to those published, and PROMs were consistently good. The skin necrosis rate was potentially due to earlier practice of performing single-stage immediate reconstruction using fixed volume breast implants. We have modified our patient selection criteria and ADM based reconstructive techniques with experience. Longer term clinical and patient reported outcome should be sought. Elsevier 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7061540/ /pubmed/32158829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2018.06.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Powell-Brett, S.
Goh, S.
Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_full Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_fullStr Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_short Clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
title_sort clinical and patient reported outcomes in breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2018.06.006
work_keys_str_mv AT powellbretts clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesinbreastreconstructionusingacellulardermalmatrix
AT gohs clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomesinbreastreconstructionusingacellulardermalmatrix