Cargando…

Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India

BACKGROUND: The estimated incidence of spina bifida is 1–2 cases per 1000 population. In earlier literature, the global prevalence of meningomyelocele (MMC) is reported as 0.8–1.0 per 1000 live births. This retrospective study analyses the outcome of various surgical procedures performed for the clo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Mukesh Kumar, Kumar, Naveen, Jha, Manoj K, N, Umesh, Srivastava, R.K., Bhattacharya, Sameek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.001
_version_ 1783504407626776576
author Sharma, Mukesh Kumar
Kumar, Naveen
Jha, Manoj K
N, Umesh
Srivastava, R.K.
Bhattacharya, Sameek
author_facet Sharma, Mukesh Kumar
Kumar, Naveen
Jha, Manoj K
N, Umesh
Srivastava, R.K.
Bhattacharya, Sameek
author_sort Sharma, Mukesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The estimated incidence of spina bifida is 1–2 cases per 1000 population. In earlier literature, the global prevalence of meningomyelocele (MMC) is reported as 0.8–1.0 per 1000 live births. This retrospective study analyses the outcome of various surgical procedures performed for the closure of MMC defects. METHOD: A total of 22 patients with MMC defects who underwent repair at our institute from July 2016 to August 2018 were included in the study. A retrospective review of all the cases operated was completed to analyse patient demography including defect size, defect location, surgical procedures, complications and the final outcome. RESULTS: Out of 22 cases, wherein the neurosurgery department sought help from the plastic surgery department, 11 defects were closed using the Limberg flap technique, 4 defects were closed with either primary closure or the double flap rotation flaps, one defect was closed using the triple rotation flap and 2 defects were closed using the local transposition flap cover technique. Complications were noted in only three cases. One patient had a local wound infection, while in two other cases, wound dehiscence was observed. All 3 cases were managed conservatively. On average, it takes approximately 70 days in India to close such defects. CONCLUSION: MMC defects can be effectively managed with local flap options such as Limberg flap, local transposition flap or rotation flaps. Various reasons for the delay in closure were reported in patients late to our centre, when the first point of contact was with other departments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7061542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70615422020-03-10 Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India Sharma, Mukesh Kumar Kumar, Naveen Jha, Manoj K N, Umesh Srivastava, R.K. Bhattacharya, Sameek JPRAS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The estimated incidence of spina bifida is 1–2 cases per 1000 population. In earlier literature, the global prevalence of meningomyelocele (MMC) is reported as 0.8–1.0 per 1000 live births. This retrospective study analyses the outcome of various surgical procedures performed for the closure of MMC defects. METHOD: A total of 22 patients with MMC defects who underwent repair at our institute from July 2016 to August 2018 were included in the study. A retrospective review of all the cases operated was completed to analyse patient demography including defect size, defect location, surgical procedures, complications and the final outcome. RESULTS: Out of 22 cases, wherein the neurosurgery department sought help from the plastic surgery department, 11 defects were closed using the Limberg flap technique, 4 defects were closed with either primary closure or the double flap rotation flaps, one defect was closed using the triple rotation flap and 2 defects were closed using the local transposition flap cover technique. Complications were noted in only three cases. One patient had a local wound infection, while in two other cases, wound dehiscence was observed. All 3 cases were managed conservatively. On average, it takes approximately 70 days in India to close such defects. CONCLUSION: MMC defects can be effectively managed with local flap options such as Limberg flap, local transposition flap or rotation flaps. Various reasons for the delay in closure were reported in patients late to our centre, when the first point of contact was with other departments. Elsevier 2019-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7061542/ /pubmed/32158889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.001 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sharma, Mukesh Kumar
Kumar, Naveen
Jha, Manoj K
N, Umesh
Srivastava, R.K.
Bhattacharya, Sameek
Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India
title Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India
title_full Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India
title_fullStr Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India
title_full_unstemmed Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India
title_short Experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in India
title_sort experience with various reconstructive techniques for meningomyelocele defect closure in india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2019.07.001
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmamukeshkumar experiencewithvariousreconstructivetechniquesformeningomyeloceledefectclosureinindia
AT kumarnaveen experiencewithvariousreconstructivetechniquesformeningomyeloceledefectclosureinindia
AT jhamanojk experiencewithvariousreconstructivetechniquesformeningomyeloceledefectclosureinindia
AT numesh experiencewithvariousreconstructivetechniquesformeningomyeloceledefectclosureinindia
AT srivastavark experiencewithvariousreconstructivetechniquesformeningomyeloceledefectclosureinindia
AT bhattacharyasameek experiencewithvariousreconstructivetechniquesformeningomyeloceledefectclosureinindia