Cargando…

Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence()

INTRODUCTION: Helical rim keloids occur commonly following ear piercings, trauma and previous surgeries and can be disfiguring. Many techniques have been developed to treated these disfiguring lesions with varying successes, however, individuals prone to developing keloids inadvertently recur despit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwek, James W.M., Lee, T.S., Loh, Ian C.Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2018.12.006
_version_ 1783504419149578240
author Kwek, James W.M.
Lee, T.S.
Loh, Ian C.Y.
author_facet Kwek, James W.M.
Lee, T.S.
Loh, Ian C.Y.
author_sort Kwek, James W.M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Helical rim keloids occur commonly following ear piercings, trauma and previous surgeries and can be disfiguring. Many techniques have been developed to treated these disfiguring lesions with varying successes, however, individuals prone to developing keloids inadvertently recur despite best efforts. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether helical rim advancement flap reconstruction following helical rim keloid excision can reduce recurrences. DESIGN: Case series followed up to 2 years. SETTING: Single Centre Tertiary Hospital Facial Plastics Service. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who consented to helical rim advancement reconstruction after keloid excision. RESULTS: The authors report a series of 7 patients with helical rim keloids ranging from 1.2 cm to 5 cm in widest diameter treated with keloid excision and reconstruction with helical rim advancement flap technique. There were no recurrences within a mean of about 19 months post-operatively. Most patients report satisfaction with the cosmetic end-result. DISCUSSION: From the authors’ experience, helical rim advancement reconstruction following excision of keloids about 2.5 cm in widest diameter is an excellent tension-free option to avoid recurrence of helical rim keloids. Wound tension is a key risk factor for keloid formation. We hypothesise that the reason why there was no recurrence is because in helical rim advancement flap reconstruction, the underlying helical rim takes all the tension of closure off the dermis, resulting in tension-free skin closure. CONCLUSION: Helical rim advancement flap reconstruction is a viable technique to avoid recurrence and minimise cosmetic deformities of the pinna for selected helical rim keloids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7061594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70615942020-03-10 Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence() Kwek, James W.M. Lee, T.S. Loh, Ian C.Y. JPRAS Open Case Reports and Short Communication INTRODUCTION: Helical rim keloids occur commonly following ear piercings, trauma and previous surgeries and can be disfiguring. Many techniques have been developed to treated these disfiguring lesions with varying successes, however, individuals prone to developing keloids inadvertently recur despite best efforts. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether helical rim advancement flap reconstruction following helical rim keloid excision can reduce recurrences. DESIGN: Case series followed up to 2 years. SETTING: Single Centre Tertiary Hospital Facial Plastics Service. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who consented to helical rim advancement reconstruction after keloid excision. RESULTS: The authors report a series of 7 patients with helical rim keloids ranging from 1.2 cm to 5 cm in widest diameter treated with keloid excision and reconstruction with helical rim advancement flap technique. There were no recurrences within a mean of about 19 months post-operatively. Most patients report satisfaction with the cosmetic end-result. DISCUSSION: From the authors’ experience, helical rim advancement reconstruction following excision of keloids about 2.5 cm in widest diameter is an excellent tension-free option to avoid recurrence of helical rim keloids. Wound tension is a key risk factor for keloid formation. We hypothesise that the reason why there was no recurrence is because in helical rim advancement flap reconstruction, the underlying helical rim takes all the tension of closure off the dermis, resulting in tension-free skin closure. CONCLUSION: Helical rim advancement flap reconstruction is a viable technique to avoid recurrence and minimise cosmetic deformities of the pinna for selected helical rim keloids. Elsevier 2018-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7061594/ /pubmed/32158854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2018.12.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Reports and Short Communication
Kwek, James W.M.
Lee, T.S.
Loh, Ian C.Y.
Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence()
title Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence()
title_full Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence()
title_fullStr Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence()
title_full_unstemmed Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence()
title_short Helical rim advancement – A technique to avoid keloid recurrence()
title_sort helical rim advancement – a technique to avoid keloid recurrence()
topic Case Reports and Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2018.12.006
work_keys_str_mv AT kwekjameswm helicalrimadvancementatechniquetoavoidkeloidrecurrence
AT leets helicalrimadvancementatechniquetoavoidkeloidrecurrence
AT lohiancy helicalrimadvancementatechniquetoavoidkeloidrecurrence