Cargando…
The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
Complete and highly accurate reference genomes and gene annotations are indispensable for basic biological research and trait improvement of woody tree species. In this study, we integrated single‐molecule sequencing and high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques to produce a high‐qu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13260 |
_version_ | 1783504455749074944 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Xiang Li, Haoxian Wu, Zhikun Yao, Wen Zhao, Peng Cao, Da Yu, Haiyan Li, Kaidi Poudel, Krishna Zhao, Diguang Zhang, Fuhong Xia, Xiaocong Chen, Lina Wang, Qi Jing, Dan Cao, Shangyin |
author_facet | Luo, Xiang Li, Haoxian Wu, Zhikun Yao, Wen Zhao, Peng Cao, Da Yu, Haiyan Li, Kaidi Poudel, Krishna Zhao, Diguang Zhang, Fuhong Xia, Xiaocong Chen, Lina Wang, Qi Jing, Dan Cao, Shangyin |
author_sort | Luo, Xiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Complete and highly accurate reference genomes and gene annotations are indispensable for basic biological research and trait improvement of woody tree species. In this study, we integrated single‐molecule sequencing and high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques to produce a high‐quality and long‐range contiguity chromosome‐scale genome assembly of the soft‐seeded pomegranate cultivar ‘Tunisia’. The genome covers 320.31 Mb (scaffold N50 = 39.96 Mb; contig N50 = 4.49 Mb) and includes 33 594 protein‐coding genes. We also resequenced 26 pomegranate varieties that varied regarding seed hardness. Comparative genomic analyses revealed many genetic differences between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties. A set of selective loci containing SUC8‐like,SUC6, FoxO and MAPK were identified by the selective sweep analysis between hard‐ and soft‐seeded populations. An exceptionally large selective region (26.2 Mb) was identified on chromosome 1. Our assembled pomegranate genome is more complete than other currently available genome assemblies. Our results indicate that genomic variations and selective genes may have contributed to the genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7061868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70618682020-03-16 The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars Luo, Xiang Li, Haoxian Wu, Zhikun Yao, Wen Zhao, Peng Cao, Da Yu, Haiyan Li, Kaidi Poudel, Krishna Zhao, Diguang Zhang, Fuhong Xia, Xiaocong Chen, Lina Wang, Qi Jing, Dan Cao, Shangyin Plant Biotechnol J Research Articles Complete and highly accurate reference genomes and gene annotations are indispensable for basic biological research and trait improvement of woody tree species. In this study, we integrated single‐molecule sequencing and high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques to produce a high‐quality and long‐range contiguity chromosome‐scale genome assembly of the soft‐seeded pomegranate cultivar ‘Tunisia’. The genome covers 320.31 Mb (scaffold N50 = 39.96 Mb; contig N50 = 4.49 Mb) and includes 33 594 protein‐coding genes. We also resequenced 26 pomegranate varieties that varied regarding seed hardness. Comparative genomic analyses revealed many genetic differences between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties. A set of selective loci containing SUC8‐like,SUC6, FoxO and MAPK were identified by the selective sweep analysis between hard‐ and soft‐seeded populations. An exceptionally large selective region (26.2 Mb) was identified on chromosome 1. Our assembled pomegranate genome is more complete than other currently available genome assemblies. Our results indicate that genomic variations and selective genes may have contributed to the genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-06 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7061868/ /pubmed/31549477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13260 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Luo, Xiang Li, Haoxian Wu, Zhikun Yao, Wen Zhao, Peng Cao, Da Yu, Haiyan Li, Kaidi Poudel, Krishna Zhao, Diguang Zhang, Fuhong Xia, Xiaocong Chen, Lina Wang, Qi Jing, Dan Cao, Shangyin The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars |
title | The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars |
title_full | The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars |
title_fullStr | The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars |
title_full_unstemmed | The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars |
title_short | The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars |
title_sort | pomegranate (punica granatum l.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luoxiang thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT lihaoxian thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT wuzhikun thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT yaowen thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT zhaopeng thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT caoda thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT yuhaiyan thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT likaidi thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT poudelkrishna thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT zhaodiguang thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT zhangfuhong thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT xiaxiaocong thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT chenlina thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT wangqi thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT jingdan thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT caoshangyin thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT luoxiang pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT lihaoxian pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT wuzhikun pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT yaowen pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT zhaopeng pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT caoda pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT yuhaiyan pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT likaidi pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT poudelkrishna pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT zhaodiguang pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT zhangfuhong pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT xiaxiaocong pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT chenlina pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT wangqi pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT jingdan pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars AT caoshangyin pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars |