Cargando…

The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars

Complete and highly accurate reference genomes and gene annotations are indispensable for basic biological research and trait improvement of woody tree species. In this study, we integrated single‐molecule sequencing and high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques to produce a high‐qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Xiang, Li, Haoxian, Wu, Zhikun, Yao, Wen, Zhao, Peng, Cao, Da, Yu, Haiyan, Li, Kaidi, Poudel, Krishna, Zhao, Diguang, Zhang, Fuhong, Xia, Xiaocong, Chen, Lina, Wang, Qi, Jing, Dan, Cao, Shangyin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13260
_version_ 1783504455749074944
author Luo, Xiang
Li, Haoxian
Wu, Zhikun
Yao, Wen
Zhao, Peng
Cao, Da
Yu, Haiyan
Li, Kaidi
Poudel, Krishna
Zhao, Diguang
Zhang, Fuhong
Xia, Xiaocong
Chen, Lina
Wang, Qi
Jing, Dan
Cao, Shangyin
author_facet Luo, Xiang
Li, Haoxian
Wu, Zhikun
Yao, Wen
Zhao, Peng
Cao, Da
Yu, Haiyan
Li, Kaidi
Poudel, Krishna
Zhao, Diguang
Zhang, Fuhong
Xia, Xiaocong
Chen, Lina
Wang, Qi
Jing, Dan
Cao, Shangyin
author_sort Luo, Xiang
collection PubMed
description Complete and highly accurate reference genomes and gene annotations are indispensable for basic biological research and trait improvement of woody tree species. In this study, we integrated single‐molecule sequencing and high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques to produce a high‐quality and long‐range contiguity chromosome‐scale genome assembly of the soft‐seeded pomegranate cultivar ‘Tunisia’. The genome covers 320.31 Mb (scaffold N50 = 39.96 Mb; contig N50 = 4.49 Mb) and includes 33 594 protein‐coding genes. We also resequenced 26 pomegranate varieties that varied regarding seed hardness. Comparative genomic analyses revealed many genetic differences between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties. A set of selective loci containing SUC8‐like,SUC6, FoxO and MAPK were identified by the selective sweep analysis between hard‐ and soft‐seeded populations. An exceptionally large selective region (26.2 Mb) was identified on chromosome 1. Our assembled pomegranate genome is more complete than other currently available genome assemblies. Our results indicate that genomic variations and selective genes may have contributed to the genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7061868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70618682020-03-16 The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars Luo, Xiang Li, Haoxian Wu, Zhikun Yao, Wen Zhao, Peng Cao, Da Yu, Haiyan Li, Kaidi Poudel, Krishna Zhao, Diguang Zhang, Fuhong Xia, Xiaocong Chen, Lina Wang, Qi Jing, Dan Cao, Shangyin Plant Biotechnol J Research Articles Complete and highly accurate reference genomes and gene annotations are indispensable for basic biological research and trait improvement of woody tree species. In this study, we integrated single‐molecule sequencing and high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques to produce a high‐quality and long‐range contiguity chromosome‐scale genome assembly of the soft‐seeded pomegranate cultivar ‘Tunisia’. The genome covers 320.31 Mb (scaffold N50 = 39.96 Mb; contig N50 = 4.49 Mb) and includes 33 594 protein‐coding genes. We also resequenced 26 pomegranate varieties that varied regarding seed hardness. Comparative genomic analyses revealed many genetic differences between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties. A set of selective loci containing SUC8‐like,SUC6, FoxO and MAPK were identified by the selective sweep analysis between hard‐ and soft‐seeded populations. An exceptionally large selective region (26.2 Mb) was identified on chromosome 1. Our assembled pomegranate genome is more complete than other currently available genome assemblies. Our results indicate that genomic variations and selective genes may have contributed to the genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded pomegranate varieties. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-06 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7061868/ /pubmed/31549477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13260 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Luo, Xiang
Li, Haoxian
Wu, Zhikun
Yao, Wen
Zhao, Peng
Cao, Da
Yu, Haiyan
Li, Kaidi
Poudel, Krishna
Zhao, Diguang
Zhang, Fuhong
Xia, Xiaocong
Chen, Lina
Wang, Qi
Jing, Dan
Cao, Shangyin
The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
title The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
title_full The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
title_fullStr The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
title_full_unstemmed The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
title_short The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
title_sort pomegranate (punica granatum l.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft‐ and hard‐seeded cultivars
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13260
work_keys_str_mv AT luoxiang thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT lihaoxian thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT wuzhikun thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT yaowen thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT zhaopeng thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT caoda thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT yuhaiyan thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT likaidi thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT poudelkrishna thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT zhaodiguang thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT zhangfuhong thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT xiaxiaocong thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT chenlina thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT wangqi thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT jingdan thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT caoshangyin thepomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT luoxiang pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT lihaoxian pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT wuzhikun pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT yaowen pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT zhaopeng pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT caoda pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT yuhaiyan pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT likaidi pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT poudelkrishna pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT zhaodiguang pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT zhangfuhong pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT xiaxiaocong pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT chenlina pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT wangqi pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT jingdan pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars
AT caoshangyin pomegranatepunicagranatumldraftgenomedissectsgeneticdivergencebetweensoftandhardseededcultivars