Cargando…

Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial

We conducted a clinical trial to assess the safety and putative efficacy of an additional human rabies immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) versus an older product (Comparator, HyperRAB S/D® [Grifols]) and determine whether HRIG interferes with development of endogenous antibodies versus Comparator, when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matson, Mark A., Schenker, Eran, Stein, Michal, Zamfirova, Vladislava, Nguyen, Huy-Binh, Bergman, Garrett E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7062421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1656967
_version_ 1783504525049462784
author Matson, Mark A.
Schenker, Eran
Stein, Michal
Zamfirova, Vladislava
Nguyen, Huy-Binh
Bergman, Garrett E.
author_facet Matson, Mark A.
Schenker, Eran
Stein, Michal
Zamfirova, Vladislava
Nguyen, Huy-Binh
Bergman, Garrett E.
author_sort Matson, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description We conducted a clinical trial to assess the safety and putative efficacy of an additional human rabies immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) versus an older product (Comparator, HyperRAB S/D® [Grifols]) and determine whether HRIG interferes with development of endogenous antibodies versus Comparator, when each is given with an active rabies vaccine. This was a prospective, double-blind, single-period, non-inferiority study in which subjects were randomized (1:1) to a single dose (20 IU/kg) of HRIG or Comparator on day 0 and rabies vaccine (RabAvert® [GlaxoSmithKline]; 1 mL of ≥2.5 IU/mL) on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Anti-rabies antibodies were measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test on day 14, and subjects were followed until day 185. Rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titers ≥0.5 IU/mL were considered seroconversion putatively indicative of protection. The non-inferiority criterion was the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) >–10%, for the between-group difference in the proportion of subjects achieving RVNA ≥0.5 IU/mL. On day 14, 98.3% of 59 subjects in the HRIG group and 100% of 59 in the Comparator group had RVNA ≥0.5 IU/mL (difference between proportions – 1.8%; 90% CI, – 8.2, 3.1; non-inferiority criterion met). One subject in the HRIG group did not meet the seroconversion criteria for anti-rabies antibody, and one subject in the Comparator group showed an anamnestic response, with much higher than expected anti-rabies antibody levels at both baseline and on day 14. Thus, HRIG allows for prophylactic anti-rabies antibody titers and is non-inferior to Comparator, when administered with rabies vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7062421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70624212020-03-16 Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial Matson, Mark A. Schenker, Eran Stein, Michal Zamfirova, Vladislava Nguyen, Huy-Binh Bergman, Garrett E. Hum Vaccin Immunother Research Paper We conducted a clinical trial to assess the safety and putative efficacy of an additional human rabies immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) versus an older product (Comparator, HyperRAB S/D® [Grifols]) and determine whether HRIG interferes with development of endogenous antibodies versus Comparator, when each is given with an active rabies vaccine. This was a prospective, double-blind, single-period, non-inferiority study in which subjects were randomized (1:1) to a single dose (20 IU/kg) of HRIG or Comparator on day 0 and rabies vaccine (RabAvert® [GlaxoSmithKline]; 1 mL of ≥2.5 IU/mL) on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Anti-rabies antibodies were measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test on day 14, and subjects were followed until day 185. Rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titers ≥0.5 IU/mL were considered seroconversion putatively indicative of protection. The non-inferiority criterion was the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) >–10%, for the between-group difference in the proportion of subjects achieving RVNA ≥0.5 IU/mL. On day 14, 98.3% of 59 subjects in the HRIG group and 100% of 59 in the Comparator group had RVNA ≥0.5 IU/mL (difference between proportions – 1.8%; 90% CI, – 8.2, 3.1; non-inferiority criterion met). One subject in the HRIG group did not meet the seroconversion criteria for anti-rabies antibody, and one subject in the Comparator group showed an anamnestic response, with much higher than expected anti-rabies antibody levels at both baseline and on day 14. Thus, HRIG allows for prophylactic anti-rabies antibody titers and is non-inferior to Comparator, when administered with rabies vaccine. Taylor & Francis 2019-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7062421/ /pubmed/31549899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1656967 Text en © 2019 Kedrion Biopharma Inc. Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Matson, Mark A.
Schenker, Eran
Stein, Michal
Zamfirova, Vladislava
Nguyen, Huy-Binh
Bergman, Garrett E.
Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial
title Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial
title_full Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial
title_short Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial
title_sort safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (hrig; kedrab) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7062421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31549899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1656967
work_keys_str_mv AT matsonmarka safetyandefficacyresultsofsimulatedpostexposureprophylaxiswithhumanimmuneglobulinhrigkedrabcoadministeredwithactivevaccineinhealthysubjectsacomparativephase23trial
AT schenkereran safetyandefficacyresultsofsimulatedpostexposureprophylaxiswithhumanimmuneglobulinhrigkedrabcoadministeredwithactivevaccineinhealthysubjectsacomparativephase23trial
AT steinmichal safetyandefficacyresultsofsimulatedpostexposureprophylaxiswithhumanimmuneglobulinhrigkedrabcoadministeredwithactivevaccineinhealthysubjectsacomparativephase23trial
AT zamfirovavladislava safetyandefficacyresultsofsimulatedpostexposureprophylaxiswithhumanimmuneglobulinhrigkedrabcoadministeredwithactivevaccineinhealthysubjectsacomparativephase23trial
AT nguyenhuybinh safetyandefficacyresultsofsimulatedpostexposureprophylaxiswithhumanimmuneglobulinhrigkedrabcoadministeredwithactivevaccineinhealthysubjectsacomparativephase23trial
AT bergmangarrette safetyandefficacyresultsofsimulatedpostexposureprophylaxiswithhumanimmuneglobulinhrigkedrabcoadministeredwithactivevaccineinhealthysubjectsacomparativephase23trial