Cargando…
Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model
INTRODUCTION: Declining rates of operative vaginal deliveries and routine episiotomy in obstetric practice, along with rising cesarean section rates, have decreased OB/GYN resident experience with episiotomy repair and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Simulation models are valuable educati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Association of American Medical Colleges
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7062543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175472 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10881 |
_version_ | 1783504540986769408 |
---|---|
author | Eston, Michelle Stephenson-Famy, Alyssa McKenna, Hannah Fialkow, Michael |
author_facet | Eston, Michelle Stephenson-Famy, Alyssa McKenna, Hannah Fialkow, Michael |
author_sort | Eston, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Declining rates of operative vaginal deliveries and routine episiotomy in obstetric practice, along with rising cesarean section rates, have decreased OB/GYN resident experience with episiotomy repair and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Simulation models are valuable educational tools in procedural training. Several models have been reported, each with its own limitations and benefits. METHODS: We developed a 1-hour workshop to teach novice OB/GYN residents perineal laceration repair skills on a modified beef tongue model. The model required 5–10 minutes to assemble following written and video instruction, and learners had 30–50 minutes to practice using learner instructions. Learners were evaluated using a procedure checklist and global objective structured assessment of technical skills. To evaluate the session, we surveyed current faculty and residents, as well as residency graduates. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2017, an estimated 82 OB/GYN residents participated in this activity, and 95 participants and facilitators received the survey. Forty-one (59%) respondents agreed that this model was similar to repairing OASIS in clinical practice. Our trainees reported that the optimal time for simulated OASIS repair was the R2 and R3 years; however, 90% of respondents felt residents should be offered this simulation yearly. DISCUSSION: Based on our survey of trainees, graduates, and faculty, we created a realistic simulated OASIS repair training, despite the limitation that the model lacked a rectum. Learners reported an interest in repeating the simulation frequently during residency to augment their clinical experience and increase perceived competence in third- and fourth-degree laceration repair by their graduation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7062543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Association of American Medical Colleges |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70625432020-03-13 Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model Eston, Michelle Stephenson-Famy, Alyssa McKenna, Hannah Fialkow, Michael MedEdPORTAL Original Publication INTRODUCTION: Declining rates of operative vaginal deliveries and routine episiotomy in obstetric practice, along with rising cesarean section rates, have decreased OB/GYN resident experience with episiotomy repair and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Simulation models are valuable educational tools in procedural training. Several models have been reported, each with its own limitations and benefits. METHODS: We developed a 1-hour workshop to teach novice OB/GYN residents perineal laceration repair skills on a modified beef tongue model. The model required 5–10 minutes to assemble following written and video instruction, and learners had 30–50 minutes to practice using learner instructions. Learners were evaluated using a procedure checklist and global objective structured assessment of technical skills. To evaluate the session, we surveyed current faculty and residents, as well as residency graduates. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2017, an estimated 82 OB/GYN residents participated in this activity, and 95 participants and facilitators received the survey. Forty-one (59%) respondents agreed that this model was similar to repairing OASIS in clinical practice. Our trainees reported that the optimal time for simulated OASIS repair was the R2 and R3 years; however, 90% of respondents felt residents should be offered this simulation yearly. DISCUSSION: Based on our survey of trainees, graduates, and faculty, we created a realistic simulated OASIS repair training, despite the limitation that the model lacked a rectum. Learners reported an interest in repeating the simulation frequently during residency to augment their clinical experience and increase perceived competence in third- and fourth-degree laceration repair by their graduation. Association of American Medical Colleges 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7062543/ /pubmed/32175472 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10881 Text en Copyright © 2020 Eston et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) license. |
spellingShingle | Original Publication Eston, Michelle Stephenson-Famy, Alyssa McKenna, Hannah Fialkow, Michael Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model |
title | Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model |
title_full | Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model |
title_fullStr | Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model |
title_short | Perineal Laceration and Episiotomy Repair Using a Beef Tongue Model |
title_sort | perineal laceration and episiotomy repair using a beef tongue model |
topic | Original Publication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7062543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175472 http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10881 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estonmichelle perineallacerationandepisiotomyrepairusingabeeftonguemodel AT stephensonfamyalyssa perineallacerationandepisiotomyrepairusingabeeftonguemodel AT mckennahannah perineallacerationandepisiotomyrepairusingabeeftonguemodel AT fialkowmichael perineallacerationandepisiotomyrepairusingabeeftonguemodel |