Cargando…

In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry

Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) have been used for many years as supplements in various livestock diets, including those for poultry. However, the use of AGPs in feed was also associated with an increasing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in livestock. In this study, the in vitro antibacte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aljumaah, Mashael R., Alkhulaifi, Manal M., Abudabos, Alaeldein M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Poultry Science Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32174764
http://dx.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0190042
_version_ 1783504641443495936
author Aljumaah, Mashael R.
Alkhulaifi, Manal M.
Abudabos, Alaeldein M.
author_facet Aljumaah, Mashael R.
Alkhulaifi, Manal M.
Abudabos, Alaeldein M.
author_sort Aljumaah, Mashael R.
collection PubMed
description Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) have been used for many years as supplements in various livestock diets, including those for poultry. However, the use of AGPs in feed was also associated with an increasing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in livestock. In this study, the in vitro antibacterial efficacies of eight commercially available non-AGPs suitable for use in poultry were investigated. Assessments included a combination of antibacterial activity assays and estimations of the minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations along with scanning electron microscopy analysis. The results showed that the probiotic, CloStat(®) exerted a bacteriostatic effect against all tested bacteria, namely Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Clostridium perfringens, whereas Gallipro Tect(®) and Bacillus Blend(®) demonstrated bacteriostatic activity towards most of the pathogens tested. Other commercial non-AGPs, Sangrovit(®), Fysal(®), and Mix oil blend(®) showed a stronger or equal antibacterial activity compared to the positive control (AGP Maxus(®) G100) againsts all bacteria tested, except C. perfringens. Nor-Spice AB(®) and Varium™ did not show any significant effect against the tested bacteria. Several of the tested AGP substitutes exhibited good antibacterial efficiency against pathogenic bacteria and thus may be good candidates for second-stage in vivo investigations into reducing pathogen colonization in broilers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7063082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Japan Poultry Science Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70630822020-03-13 In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry Aljumaah, Mashael R. Alkhulaifi, Manal M. Abudabos, Alaeldein M. J Poult Sci Full Papers Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) have been used for many years as supplements in various livestock diets, including those for poultry. However, the use of AGPs in feed was also associated with an increasing number of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in livestock. In this study, the in vitro antibacterial efficacies of eight commercially available non-AGPs suitable for use in poultry were investigated. Assessments included a combination of antibacterial activity assays and estimations of the minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations along with scanning electron microscopy analysis. The results showed that the probiotic, CloStat(®) exerted a bacteriostatic effect against all tested bacteria, namely Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Clostridium perfringens, whereas Gallipro Tect(®) and Bacillus Blend(®) demonstrated bacteriostatic activity towards most of the pathogens tested. Other commercial non-AGPs, Sangrovit(®), Fysal(®), and Mix oil blend(®) showed a stronger or equal antibacterial activity compared to the positive control (AGP Maxus(®) G100) againsts all bacteria tested, except C. perfringens. Nor-Spice AB(®) and Varium™ did not show any significant effect against the tested bacteria. Several of the tested AGP substitutes exhibited good antibacterial efficiency against pathogenic bacteria and thus may be good candidates for second-stage in vivo investigations into reducing pathogen colonization in broilers. Japan Poultry Science Association 2020-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7063082/ /pubmed/32174764 http://dx.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0190042 Text en 2020, Japan Poultry Science Association. The Journal of Poultry Science is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full Papers
Aljumaah, Mashael R.
Alkhulaifi, Manal M.
Abudabos, Alaeldein M.
In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry
title In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry
title_full In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry
title_fullStr In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry
title_full_unstemmed In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry
title_short In vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry Industry
title_sort in vitro antibacterial efficacy of non-antibiotic growth promoters in poultry industry
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32174764
http://dx.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0190042
work_keys_str_mv AT aljumaahmashaelr invitroantibacterialefficacyofnonantibioticgrowthpromotersinpoultryindustry
AT alkhulaifimanalm invitroantibacterialefficacyofnonantibioticgrowthpromotersinpoultryindustry
AT abudabosalaeldeinm invitroantibacterialefficacyofnonantibioticgrowthpromotersinpoultryindustry