Cargando…

Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model

Currently, one of the central problems in cancer management is the relapse of disease following conventional treatments, yet few therapeutic agents targeting resistance and tolerance exist. Propolis is known as a healing agent since ancient times. Therefore, over time, its curative properties have k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gal, A. F., Stan, L., Tăbăran, F., Rugină, D., Cătoi, A. F., Andrei, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32184916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4014838
_version_ 1783504666088177664
author Gal, A. F.
Stan, L.
Tăbăran, F.
Rugină, D.
Cătoi, A. F.
Andrei, S.
author_facet Gal, A. F.
Stan, L.
Tăbăran, F.
Rugină, D.
Cătoi, A. F.
Andrei, S.
author_sort Gal, A. F.
collection PubMed
description Currently, one of the central problems in cancer management is the relapse of disease following conventional treatments, yet few therapeutic agents targeting resistance and tolerance exist. Propolis is known as a healing agent since ancient times. Therefore, over time, its curative properties have kept the interest of scientists, thus leading permanently to investigations of its other possible undiscovered effects. In this context, current experiments were performed to establish the chemopreventive potential of propolis extract (PE) (1.05 mg/kg BW/day) in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea- (MNU-) induced rat mammary tumors. MNU-inoculated/PE-treated rats had tumors of different physical attributes compared with control rats MNU-inoculated. The number of developed tumors (mean 49% versus 100%), incidence (mean 49% versus 100%), multiplicity (1.8 versus 3.7 (p < 0.001)), tumor volume (mean 10 cm(3) versus 16 cm(3) (p < 0.001)), and weight of the tumor mass (mean 7.42 g versus 9.00 g (p < 0.05)) were noted. The numbers of grade I tumors recorded for MNU-inoculated rats were 24 (Group 1) and 7 (Group 2) for MNU-induced/PE-treated rats. In the serum of rats MNU-inoculated/PE-treated were found higher levels of antioxidative enzymes (SOD, CAT, and GPx) than in MNU-induced. Taken together, these data indicate that propolis could be a chemopreventive agent against MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7063188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70631882020-03-17 Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model Gal, A. F. Stan, L. Tăbăran, F. Rugină, D. Cătoi, A. F. Andrei, S. Oxid Med Cell Longev Research Article Currently, one of the central problems in cancer management is the relapse of disease following conventional treatments, yet few therapeutic agents targeting resistance and tolerance exist. Propolis is known as a healing agent since ancient times. Therefore, over time, its curative properties have kept the interest of scientists, thus leading permanently to investigations of its other possible undiscovered effects. In this context, current experiments were performed to establish the chemopreventive potential of propolis extract (PE) (1.05 mg/kg BW/day) in N-methyl-N-nitrosourea- (MNU-) induced rat mammary tumors. MNU-inoculated/PE-treated rats had tumors of different physical attributes compared with control rats MNU-inoculated. The number of developed tumors (mean 49% versus 100%), incidence (mean 49% versus 100%), multiplicity (1.8 versus 3.7 (p < 0.001)), tumor volume (mean 10 cm(3) versus 16 cm(3) (p < 0.001)), and weight of the tumor mass (mean 7.42 g versus 9.00 g (p < 0.05)) were noted. The numbers of grade I tumors recorded for MNU-inoculated rats were 24 (Group 1) and 7 (Group 2) for MNU-induced/PE-treated rats. In the serum of rats MNU-inoculated/PE-treated were found higher levels of antioxidative enzymes (SOD, CAT, and GPx) than in MNU-induced. Taken together, these data indicate that propolis could be a chemopreventive agent against MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis. Hindawi 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7063188/ /pubmed/32184916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4014838 Text en Copyright © 2020 A. F. Gal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gal, A. F.
Stan, L.
Tăbăran, F.
Rugină, D.
Cătoi, A. F.
Andrei, S.
Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model
title Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model
title_full Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model
title_fullStr Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model
title_full_unstemmed Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model
title_short Chemopreventive Effects of Propolis in the MNU-Induced Rat Mammary Tumor Model
title_sort chemopreventive effects of propolis in the mnu-induced rat mammary tumor model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32184916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4014838
work_keys_str_mv AT galaf chemopreventiveeffectsofpropolisinthemnuinducedratmammarytumormodel
AT stanl chemopreventiveeffectsofpropolisinthemnuinducedratmammarytumormodel
AT tabaranf chemopreventiveeffectsofpropolisinthemnuinducedratmammarytumormodel
AT ruginad chemopreventiveeffectsofpropolisinthemnuinducedratmammarytumormodel
AT catoiaf chemopreventiveeffectsofpropolisinthemnuinducedratmammarytumormodel
AT andreis chemopreventiveeffectsofpropolisinthemnuinducedratmammarytumormodel