Cargando…
External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
BACKGROUND: Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) assesses the risk of death within 7 days of emergency department (ED) presentation for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to externally validate and refine the EHMRG model in patients who presented to the ED with AHF. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003 |
_version_ | 1783504721234886656 |
---|---|
author | Sepehrvand, Nariman Youngson, Erik Bakal, Jeffrey A. McAlister, Finlay A. Rowe, Brian H. Ezekowitz, Justin A. |
author_facet | Sepehrvand, Nariman Youngson, Erik Bakal, Jeffrey A. McAlister, Finlay A. Rowe, Brian H. Ezekowitz, Justin A. |
author_sort | Sepehrvand, Nariman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) assesses the risk of death within 7 days of emergency department (ED) presentation for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to externally validate and refine the EHMRG model in patients who presented to the ED with AHF. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using administrative data for all ambulance-transported patients from Alberta (2012-2016) presenting to the ED with a primary diagnosis of AHF. RESULTS: Among 6708 patients with AHF, the 7-day mortality was 0.0%, 0.8%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 4.2%, and 12.0% across EHMRG risk categories (1-4, 5A and 5B). The EHMRG score had a c-index of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.76) for 7-day mortality and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) for 30-day mortality, but lower c-statistics for other outcomes (0.61-0.67). The inclusion of natriuretic peptides to the EHMRG model improved prediction (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.268; 95% CI, 0.173-0.363; P < 0.01) for 7-day mortality, as did the addition of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.005-0.218; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The EHMRG model exhibited moderate discriminative ability in a large population-based cohort of patients with AHF in the ED. Revision of the EHMRG score through factor inclusion and exclusion could improve the model’s performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7063601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70636012020-03-10 External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department Sepehrvand, Nariman Youngson, Erik Bakal, Jeffrey A. McAlister, Finlay A. Rowe, Brian H. Ezekowitz, Justin A. CJC Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) assesses the risk of death within 7 days of emergency department (ED) presentation for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to externally validate and refine the EHMRG model in patients who presented to the ED with AHF. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using administrative data for all ambulance-transported patients from Alberta (2012-2016) presenting to the ED with a primary diagnosis of AHF. RESULTS: Among 6708 patients with AHF, the 7-day mortality was 0.0%, 0.8%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 4.2%, and 12.0% across EHMRG risk categories (1-4, 5A and 5B). The EHMRG score had a c-index of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.76) for 7-day mortality and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) for 30-day mortality, but lower c-statistics for other outcomes (0.61-0.67). The inclusion of natriuretic peptides to the EHMRG model improved prediction (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.268; 95% CI, 0.173-0.363; P < 0.01) for 7-day mortality, as did the addition of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.005-0.218; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The EHMRG model exhibited moderate discriminative ability in a large population-based cohort of patients with AHF in the ED. Revision of the EHMRG score through factor inclusion and exclusion could improve the model’s performance. Elsevier 2019-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7063601/ /pubmed/32159095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003 Text en © 2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sepehrvand, Nariman Youngson, Erik Bakal, Jeffrey A. McAlister, Finlay A. Rowe, Brian H. Ezekowitz, Justin A. External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department |
title | External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department |
title_full | External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department |
title_short | External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department |
title_sort | external validation and refinement of emergency heart failure mortality risk grade risk model in patients with heart failure in the emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sepehrvandnariman externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment AT youngsonerik externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment AT bakaljeffreya externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment AT mcalisterfinlaya externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment AT rowebrianh externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment AT ezekowitzjustina externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment |