Cargando…

External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) assesses the risk of death within 7 days of emergency department (ED) presentation for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to externally validate and refine the EHMRG model in patients who presented to the ED with AHF. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sepehrvand, Nariman, Youngson, Erik, Bakal, Jeffrey A., McAlister, Finlay A., Rowe, Brian H., Ezekowitz, Justin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003
_version_ 1783504721234886656
author Sepehrvand, Nariman
Youngson, Erik
Bakal, Jeffrey A.
McAlister, Finlay A.
Rowe, Brian H.
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
author_facet Sepehrvand, Nariman
Youngson, Erik
Bakal, Jeffrey A.
McAlister, Finlay A.
Rowe, Brian H.
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
author_sort Sepehrvand, Nariman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) assesses the risk of death within 7 days of emergency department (ED) presentation for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to externally validate and refine the EHMRG model in patients who presented to the ED with AHF. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using administrative data for all ambulance-transported patients from Alberta (2012-2016) presenting to the ED with a primary diagnosis of AHF. RESULTS: Among 6708 patients with AHF, the 7-day mortality was 0.0%, 0.8%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 4.2%, and 12.0% across EHMRG risk categories (1-4, 5A and 5B). The EHMRG score had a c-index of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.76) for 7-day mortality and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) for 30-day mortality, but lower c-statistics for other outcomes (0.61-0.67). The inclusion of natriuretic peptides to the EHMRG model improved prediction (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.268; 95% CI, 0.173-0.363; P < 0.01) for 7-day mortality, as did the addition of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.005-0.218; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The EHMRG model exhibited moderate discriminative ability in a large population-based cohort of patients with AHF in the ED. Revision of the EHMRG score through factor inclusion and exclusion could improve the model’s performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7063601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70636012020-03-10 External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department Sepehrvand, Nariman Youngson, Erik Bakal, Jeffrey A. McAlister, Finlay A. Rowe, Brian H. Ezekowitz, Justin A. CJC Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) assesses the risk of death within 7 days of emergency department (ED) presentation for patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to externally validate and refine the EHMRG model in patients who presented to the ED with AHF. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using administrative data for all ambulance-transported patients from Alberta (2012-2016) presenting to the ED with a primary diagnosis of AHF. RESULTS: Among 6708 patients with AHF, the 7-day mortality was 0.0%, 0.8%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 4.2%, and 12.0% across EHMRG risk categories (1-4, 5A and 5B). The EHMRG score had a c-index of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.76) for 7-day mortality and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) for 30-day mortality, but lower c-statistics for other outcomes (0.61-0.67). The inclusion of natriuretic peptides to the EHMRG model improved prediction (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.268; 95% CI, 0.173-0.363; P < 0.01) for 7-day mortality, as did the addition of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (Net Reclassification Improvement, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.005-0.218; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The EHMRG model exhibited moderate discriminative ability in a large population-based cohort of patients with AHF in the ED. Revision of the EHMRG score through factor inclusion and exclusion could improve the model’s performance. Elsevier 2019-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7063601/ /pubmed/32159095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003 Text en © 2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sepehrvand, Nariman
Youngson, Erik
Bakal, Jeffrey A.
McAlister, Finlay A.
Rowe, Brian H.
Ezekowitz, Justin A.
External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
title External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
title_full External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
title_short External Validation and Refinement of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade Risk Model in Patients With Heart Failure in the Emergency Department
title_sort external validation and refinement of emergency heart failure mortality risk grade risk model in patients with heart failure in the emergency department
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT sepehrvandnariman externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment
AT youngsonerik externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment
AT bakaljeffreya externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment
AT mcalisterfinlaya externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment
AT rowebrianh externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment
AT ezekowitzjustina externalvalidationandrefinementofemergencyheartfailuremortalityriskgraderiskmodelinpatientswithheartfailureintheemergencydepartment