Cargando…
An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a nat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.05.007 |
_version_ | 1783504730765393920 |
---|---|
author | Sandhu, Roopinder K. Wilton, Stephen B. Cruz, Jennifer Aztema, Clare L. MacFarlane, Kendra McKelvie, Robert Lambert, Laurie Rush, Kathy Zimmerman, Rodney Oakes, Garth Deyell, Mark Wyse, D. George Cox, Jafna L. Skanes, Allan |
author_facet | Sandhu, Roopinder K. Wilton, Stephen B. Cruz, Jennifer Aztema, Clare L. MacFarlane, Kendra McKelvie, Robert Lambert, Laurie Rush, Kathy Zimmerman, Rodney Oakes, Garth Deyell, Mark Wyse, D. George Cox, Jafna L. Skanes, Allan |
author_sort | Sandhu, Roopinder K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a national level. METHODS: The working group reconvened in 2017 to review the relevance of previously proposed QIs, identify opportunities to develop new QIs, and propose an initial strategy for measuring and reporting. RESULTS: Two additional priority QIs were added to the previous 3: proportion of patients with nonvalvular (NV) AF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and annual rate of hospitalization for a new heart failure diagnosis. An environmental scan was undertaken to determine the potential of existing databases to provide national and provincial estimates. On the basis of validated administrative codes, the Canadian Institute for Health Information discharge abstract database can be used for inpatients. In collaboration with the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, 2 of the 5 QIs can be assessed in outpatients (patients with NVAF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and high risk for stroke NVAF/AFL receiving oral anticoagulation). Stroke prevention therapy can be further measured in selected provinces with linked databases including prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This first step could provide a better initial understanding of the quality of AF/AFL care in Canada, but important gaps in the meaningful measurement of QIs remain. The AF/AFL QI working group has limited capacity to make progress without national level leadership and the resources to support data aggregation, data analysis, and pan-Canadian reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7063642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70636422020-03-10 An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter Sandhu, Roopinder K. Wilton, Stephen B. Cruz, Jennifer Aztema, Clare L. MacFarlane, Kendra McKelvie, Robert Lambert, Laurie Rush, Kathy Zimmerman, Rodney Oakes, Garth Deyell, Mark Wyse, D. George Cox, Jafna L. Skanes, Allan CJC Open Quality Improvement BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a national level. METHODS: The working group reconvened in 2017 to review the relevance of previously proposed QIs, identify opportunities to develop new QIs, and propose an initial strategy for measuring and reporting. RESULTS: Two additional priority QIs were added to the previous 3: proportion of patients with nonvalvular (NV) AF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and annual rate of hospitalization for a new heart failure diagnosis. An environmental scan was undertaken to determine the potential of existing databases to provide national and provincial estimates. On the basis of validated administrative codes, the Canadian Institute for Health Information discharge abstract database can be used for inpatients. In collaboration with the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, 2 of the 5 QIs can be assessed in outpatients (patients with NVAF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and high risk for stroke NVAF/AFL receiving oral anticoagulation). Stroke prevention therapy can be further measured in selected provinces with linked databases including prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This first step could provide a better initial understanding of the quality of AF/AFL care in Canada, but important gaps in the meaningful measurement of QIs remain. The AF/AFL QI working group has limited capacity to make progress without national level leadership and the resources to support data aggregation, data analysis, and pan-Canadian reporting. Elsevier 2019-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7063642/ /pubmed/32159107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.05.007 Text en © 2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Sandhu, Roopinder K. Wilton, Stephen B. Cruz, Jennifer Aztema, Clare L. MacFarlane, Kendra McKelvie, Robert Lambert, Laurie Rush, Kathy Zimmerman, Rodney Oakes, Garth Deyell, Mark Wyse, D. George Cox, Jafna L. Skanes, Allan An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter |
title | An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter |
title_full | An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter |
title_fullStr | An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter |
title_full_unstemmed | An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter |
title_short | An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter |
title_sort | update on the development and feasibility assessment of canadian quality indicators for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter |
topic | Quality Improvement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.05.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandhuroopinderk anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT wiltonstephenb anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT cruzjennifer anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT aztemaclarel anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT macfarlanekendra anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT mckelvierobert anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT lambertlaurie anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT rushkathy anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT zimmermanrodney anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT oakesgarth anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT deyellmark anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT wysedgeorge anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT coxjafnal anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT skanesallan anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT sandhuroopinderk updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT wiltonstephenb updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT cruzjennifer updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT aztemaclarel updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT macfarlanekendra updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT mckelvierobert updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT lambertlaurie updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT rushkathy updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT zimmermanrodney updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT oakesgarth updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT deyellmark updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT wysedgeorge updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT coxjafnal updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter AT skanesallan updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter |