Cargando…

An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a nat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandhu, Roopinder K., Wilton, Stephen B., Cruz, Jennifer, Aztema, Clare L., MacFarlane, Kendra, McKelvie, Robert, Lambert, Laurie, Rush, Kathy, Zimmerman, Rodney, Oakes, Garth, Deyell, Mark, Wyse, D. George, Cox, Jafna L., Skanes, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.05.007
_version_ 1783504730765393920
author Sandhu, Roopinder K.
Wilton, Stephen B.
Cruz, Jennifer
Aztema, Clare L.
MacFarlane, Kendra
McKelvie, Robert
Lambert, Laurie
Rush, Kathy
Zimmerman, Rodney
Oakes, Garth
Deyell, Mark
Wyse, D. George
Cox, Jafna L.
Skanes, Allan
author_facet Sandhu, Roopinder K.
Wilton, Stephen B.
Cruz, Jennifer
Aztema, Clare L.
MacFarlane, Kendra
McKelvie, Robert
Lambert, Laurie
Rush, Kathy
Zimmerman, Rodney
Oakes, Garth
Deyell, Mark
Wyse, D. George
Cox, Jafna L.
Skanes, Allan
author_sort Sandhu, Roopinder K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a national level. METHODS: The working group reconvened in 2017 to review the relevance of previously proposed QIs, identify opportunities to develop new QIs, and propose an initial strategy for measuring and reporting. RESULTS: Two additional priority QIs were added to the previous 3: proportion of patients with nonvalvular (NV) AF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and annual rate of hospitalization for a new heart failure diagnosis. An environmental scan was undertaken to determine the potential of existing databases to provide national and provincial estimates. On the basis of validated administrative codes, the Canadian Institute for Health Information discharge abstract database can be used for inpatients. In collaboration with the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, 2 of the 5 QIs can be assessed in outpatients (patients with NVAF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and high risk for stroke NVAF/AFL receiving oral anticoagulation). Stroke prevention therapy can be further measured in selected provinces with linked databases including prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This first step could provide a better initial understanding of the quality of AF/AFL care in Canada, but important gaps in the meaningful measurement of QIs remain. The AF/AFL QI working group has limited capacity to make progress without national level leadership and the resources to support data aggregation, data analysis, and pan-Canadian reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7063642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70636422020-03-10 An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter Sandhu, Roopinder K. Wilton, Stephen B. Cruz, Jennifer Aztema, Clare L. MacFarlane, Kendra McKelvie, Robert Lambert, Laurie Rush, Kathy Zimmerman, Rodney Oakes, Garth Deyell, Mark Wyse, D. George Cox, Jafna L. Skanes, Allan CJC Open Quality Improvement BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL) quality indicator (QI) working group was established to develop QIs and assess feasibility of measurement. After extensive review, 3 priority QIs were selected. However, none were measurable at a national level. METHODS: The working group reconvened in 2017 to review the relevance of previously proposed QIs, identify opportunities to develop new QIs, and propose an initial strategy for measuring and reporting. RESULTS: Two additional priority QIs were added to the previous 3: proportion of patients with nonvalvular (NV) AF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and annual rate of hospitalization for a new heart failure diagnosis. An environmental scan was undertaken to determine the potential of existing databases to provide national and provincial estimates. On the basis of validated administrative codes, the Canadian Institute for Health Information discharge abstract database can be used for inpatients. In collaboration with the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, 2 of the 5 QIs can be assessed in outpatients (patients with NVAF/AFL sorted by stroke risk stratum and high risk for stroke NVAF/AFL receiving oral anticoagulation). Stroke prevention therapy can be further measured in selected provinces with linked databases including prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: This first step could provide a better initial understanding of the quality of AF/AFL care in Canada, but important gaps in the meaningful measurement of QIs remain. The AF/AFL QI working group has limited capacity to make progress without national level leadership and the resources to support data aggregation, data analysis, and pan-Canadian reporting. Elsevier 2019-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7063642/ /pubmed/32159107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.05.007 Text en © 2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Sandhu, Roopinder K.
Wilton, Stephen B.
Cruz, Jennifer
Aztema, Clare L.
MacFarlane, Kendra
McKelvie, Robert
Lambert, Laurie
Rush, Kathy
Zimmerman, Rodney
Oakes, Garth
Deyell, Mark
Wyse, D. George
Cox, Jafna L.
Skanes, Allan
An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
title An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
title_full An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
title_fullStr An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
title_full_unstemmed An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
title_short An Update on the Development and Feasibility Assessment of Canadian Quality Indicators for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter
title_sort update on the development and feasibility assessment of canadian quality indicators for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2019.05.007
work_keys_str_mv AT sandhuroopinderk anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT wiltonstephenb anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT cruzjennifer anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT aztemaclarel anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT macfarlanekendra anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT mckelvierobert anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT lambertlaurie anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT rushkathy anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT zimmermanrodney anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT oakesgarth anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT deyellmark anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT wysedgeorge anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT coxjafnal anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT skanesallan anupdateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT sandhuroopinderk updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT wiltonstephenb updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT cruzjennifer updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT aztemaclarel updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT macfarlanekendra updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT mckelvierobert updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT lambertlaurie updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT rushkathy updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT zimmermanrodney updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT oakesgarth updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT deyellmark updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT wysedgeorge updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT coxjafnal updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter
AT skanesallan updateonthedevelopmentandfeasibilityassessmentofcanadianqualityindicatorsforatrialfibrillationandatrialflutter