Cargando…
The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy
PURPOSE: To compare treatment plans for interstitial high dose rate (HDR) liver brachytherapy with (192)Ir calculated according to current-standard TG-43U1 protocol with model-based dose calculation following TG-186 protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated dose volume histogram (DVH) paramete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32151255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01492-9 |
_version_ | 1783504744564654080 |
---|---|
author | Duque, Anna Sophie Corradini, Stefanie Kamp, Florian Seidensticker, Max Streitparth, Florian Kurz, Christopher Walter, Franziska Parodi, Katia Verhaegen, Frank Ricke, Jens Belka, Claus Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva Landry, Guillaume |
author_facet | Duque, Anna Sophie Corradini, Stefanie Kamp, Florian Seidensticker, Max Streitparth, Florian Kurz, Christopher Walter, Franziska Parodi, Katia Verhaegen, Frank Ricke, Jens Belka, Claus Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva Landry, Guillaume |
author_sort | Duque, Anna Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare treatment plans for interstitial high dose rate (HDR) liver brachytherapy with (192)Ir calculated according to current-standard TG-43U1 protocol with model-based dose calculation following TG-186 protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters for liver, organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) of 20 patient cases diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Dose calculations on a homogeneous water geometry (TG-43U1 surrogate) and on a computed tomography (CT) based geometry (TG-186) were performed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The CTs were segmented based on a combination of assigning TG-186 recommended tissues to fixed Hounsfield Unit (HU) ranges and using organ contours delineated by physicians. For the liver, V(5Gy) and V(10Gy) were analysed, and for OARs the dose to 1 cubic centimeter (D(1cc)). Target coverage was assessed by calculating V(150), V(100), V(95) and V(90) as well as D(95) and D(90). For every DVH parameter, median, minimum and maximum values of the deviations of TG-186 from TG-43U1 were analysed. RESULTS: TG-186-calculated dose was found to be on average lower than dose calculated with TG-43U1. The deviation of highest magnitude for liver parameters was -6.2% of the total liver volume. For OARs, the deviations were all smaller than or equal to -0.5 Gy. Target coverage deviations were as high as -1.5% of the total CTV volume and -3.5% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we found that TG-43U1 overestimates dose to liver tissue compared to TG-186. This finding may be of clinical importance for cases where dose to the whole liver is the limiting factor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7063719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70637192020-03-13 The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy Duque, Anna Sophie Corradini, Stefanie Kamp, Florian Seidensticker, Max Streitparth, Florian Kurz, Christopher Walter, Franziska Parodi, Katia Verhaegen, Frank Ricke, Jens Belka, Claus Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva Landry, Guillaume Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To compare treatment plans for interstitial high dose rate (HDR) liver brachytherapy with (192)Ir calculated according to current-standard TG-43U1 protocol with model-based dose calculation following TG-186 protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters for liver, organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) of 20 patient cases diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Dose calculations on a homogeneous water geometry (TG-43U1 surrogate) and on a computed tomography (CT) based geometry (TG-186) were performed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The CTs were segmented based on a combination of assigning TG-186 recommended tissues to fixed Hounsfield Unit (HU) ranges and using organ contours delineated by physicians. For the liver, V(5Gy) and V(10Gy) were analysed, and for OARs the dose to 1 cubic centimeter (D(1cc)). Target coverage was assessed by calculating V(150), V(100), V(95) and V(90) as well as D(95) and D(90). For every DVH parameter, median, minimum and maximum values of the deviations of TG-186 from TG-43U1 were analysed. RESULTS: TG-186-calculated dose was found to be on average lower than dose calculated with TG-43U1. The deviation of highest magnitude for liver parameters was -6.2% of the total liver volume. For OARs, the deviations were all smaller than or equal to -0.5 Gy. Target coverage deviations were as high as -1.5% of the total CTV volume and -3.5% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we found that TG-43U1 overestimates dose to liver tissue compared to TG-186. This finding may be of clinical importance for cases where dose to the whole liver is the limiting factor. BioMed Central 2020-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7063719/ /pubmed/32151255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01492-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Duque, Anna Sophie Corradini, Stefanie Kamp, Florian Seidensticker, Max Streitparth, Florian Kurz, Christopher Walter, Franziska Parodi, Katia Verhaegen, Frank Ricke, Jens Belka, Claus Fonseca, Gabriel Paiva Landry, Guillaume The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy |
title | The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy |
title_full | The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy |
title_fullStr | The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy |
title_short | The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy |
title_sort | dosimetric impact of replacing the tg-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32151255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01492-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duqueannasophie thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT corradinistefanie thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT kampflorian thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT seidenstickermax thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT streitparthflorian thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT kurzchristopher thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT walterfranziska thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT parodikatia thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT verhaegenfrank thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT rickejens thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT belkaclaus thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT fonsecagabrielpaiva thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT landryguillaume thedosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT duqueannasophie dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT corradinistefanie dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT kampflorian dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT seidenstickermax dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT streitparthflorian dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT kurzchristopher dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT walterfranziska dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT parodikatia dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT verhaegenfrank dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT rickejens dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT belkaclaus dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT fonsecagabrielpaiva dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy AT landryguillaume dosimetricimpactofreplacingthetg43algorithmbymodelbaseddosecalculationforliverbrachytherapy |