Cargando…

Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study

BACKGROUND: Children who are frequently aggressive or lack empathy show various deficits in their social information processing. Several findings suggest that children with conduct problems (CP) show a tendency to interpret ambiguous situations as hostile (hostile attribution bias) and have difficul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartmann, Daniela, Ueno, Kathrin, Schwenck, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-020-00315-9
_version_ 1783504752086089728
author Hartmann, Daniela
Ueno, Kathrin
Schwenck, Christina
author_facet Hartmann, Daniela
Ueno, Kathrin
Schwenck, Christina
author_sort Hartmann, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children who are frequently aggressive or lack empathy show various deficits in their social information processing. Several findings suggest that children with conduct problems (CP) show a tendency to interpret ambiguous situations as hostile (hostile attribution bias) and have difficulties to disengage from negative stimuli (attentional bias). The role that additional callous-unemotional traits (CU-traits) play in these biases is yet unclear. Investigating both attentional and attributional aspects of social information processing in children can help us to understand where anomalies in the processing pathway occur and whether the biases are associated with CP and CU-traits separately or in an interactive manner. METHODS: We compared three groups of children: (a) 25 children with CP and low levels of CU-traits (b) 25 children with CP and elevated levels of CU-traits (c) 50 gender (68% male), age (8–17 years) and intelligence score-matched typically developing children, on a pictorial emotional stroop task and a hostile attribution bias task. RESULTS: In contrast to our predictions, there were no significant group differences regarding attentional biases or hostile attribution biases. Boys with CP and high levels of CU-traits showed a significantly higher hostile attribution bias compared to girls with CP and high levels of CU-traits. The attention bias to angry stimuli significantly correlated with the hostile attribution bias. Compared to the control group the CP group with low levels of CU-traits showed a significantly stronger association between the attention bias to angry stimuli and the hostile attribution bias. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides evidence that boys with CP and high levels of CU-traits interpret ambiguous situations as more hostile than girls do. Our results further provide indications that the interaction of attentional and attributional biases in children with CP might contribute to their increased aggressive behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7063755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70637552020-03-13 Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study Hartmann, Daniela Ueno, Kathrin Schwenck, Christina Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Children who are frequently aggressive or lack empathy show various deficits in their social information processing. Several findings suggest that children with conduct problems (CP) show a tendency to interpret ambiguous situations as hostile (hostile attribution bias) and have difficulties to disengage from negative stimuli (attentional bias). The role that additional callous-unemotional traits (CU-traits) play in these biases is yet unclear. Investigating both attentional and attributional aspects of social information processing in children can help us to understand where anomalies in the processing pathway occur and whether the biases are associated with CP and CU-traits separately or in an interactive manner. METHODS: We compared three groups of children: (a) 25 children with CP and low levels of CU-traits (b) 25 children with CP and elevated levels of CU-traits (c) 50 gender (68% male), age (8–17 years) and intelligence score-matched typically developing children, on a pictorial emotional stroop task and a hostile attribution bias task. RESULTS: In contrast to our predictions, there were no significant group differences regarding attentional biases or hostile attribution biases. Boys with CP and high levels of CU-traits showed a significantly higher hostile attribution bias compared to girls with CP and high levels of CU-traits. The attention bias to angry stimuli significantly correlated with the hostile attribution bias. Compared to the control group the CP group with low levels of CU-traits showed a significantly stronger association between the attention bias to angry stimuli and the hostile attribution bias. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides evidence that boys with CP and high levels of CU-traits interpret ambiguous situations as more hostile than girls do. Our results further provide indications that the interaction of attentional and attributional biases in children with CP might contribute to their increased aggressive behavior. BioMed Central 2020-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7063755/ /pubmed/32175005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-020-00315-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hartmann, Daniela
Ueno, Kathrin
Schwenck, Christina
Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study
title Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study
title_full Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study
title_fullStr Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study
title_short Attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study
title_sort attributional and attentional bias in children with conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits: a case–control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13034-020-00315-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmanndaniela attributionalandattentionalbiasinchildrenwithconductproblemsandcallousunemotionaltraitsacasecontrolstudy
AT uenokathrin attributionalandattentionalbiasinchildrenwithconductproblemsandcallousunemotionaltraitsacasecontrolstudy
AT schwenckchristina attributionalandattentionalbiasinchildrenwithconductproblemsandcallousunemotionaltraitsacasecontrolstudy