Cargando…

Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect

To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase “Do you want everything done?” DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Single community hospital in Ontario. SUBJECTS: Nonrandom sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: DiDiodato, Giulio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000052
_version_ 1783504778109648896
author DiDiodato, Giulio
author_facet DiDiodato, Giulio
author_sort DiDiodato, Giulio
collection PubMed
description To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase “Do you want everything done?” DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Single community hospital in Ontario. SUBJECTS: Nonrandom sampling of healthcare providers and the public. INTERVENTION: Online survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1,621 subjects who entered the survey, 692 consented and 432 completed the survey. Females comprised 73% of subjects. Over 95% of subjects were under 65 years old, and 50% had some intensive care–related exposure. Healthcare providers comprised 29% of the subjects. The relative importance of attributes for determining the probability of withdraw life-sustaining therapy by substitute decision makers was as follows: stated patient preferences equals to 23.4%; patient age equals to 20.6%; physical function prognosis equals to 15.2%; length of ICU stay equals to 14.4%; survival prognosis equals to 13.8%; and prognosis for communication equals to 12.6%. Using attribute level utilities, the probability of an substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing a patient answer in the affirmative “Do you want everything done?” compared with “I would not want to live if I could not take care of myself” was 18.8% (95% CI, 17.2–20.4%) versus 59.8% (95% CI, 57.6–62.0%) after controlling for all the other five attribute levels in the scenario: age greater than 80 years; survival prognosis less than 1%; length of ICU stay greater than 6 months; communication equals to unresponsive; and physical equals to bed bound. CONCLUSIONS: Using a discrete choice experiment survey, we estimated the impact of a commonly employed and poorly understood phrase physicians may use when discussing advance care plans with patients and their substitute decision makers on the subsequent withdraw life-sustaining therapies. This phrase is predicted to dramatically reduce the likelihood of withdraw life-sustaining therapy even in medically nonbeneficial scenarios and potentially contribute to low-value end-of-life care and outcomes. The immediate cessation of this term should be reinforced in medical training for all healthcare providers who participate in advance care planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7063893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70638932020-03-12 Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect DiDiodato, Giulio Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report To estimate the probability of a substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing an affirmative patient response to the phrase “Do you want everything done?” DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Single community hospital in Ontario. SUBJECTS: Nonrandom sampling of healthcare providers and the public. INTERVENTION: Online survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1,621 subjects who entered the survey, 692 consented and 432 completed the survey. Females comprised 73% of subjects. Over 95% of subjects were under 65 years old, and 50% had some intensive care–related exposure. Healthcare providers comprised 29% of the subjects. The relative importance of attributes for determining the probability of withdraw life-sustaining therapy by substitute decision makers was as follows: stated patient preferences equals to 23.4%; patient age equals to 20.6%; physical function prognosis equals to 15.2%; length of ICU stay equals to 14.4%; survival prognosis equals to 13.8%; and prognosis for communication equals to 12.6%. Using attribute level utilities, the probability of an substitute decision maker choosing to withdraw life-sustaining therapy after hearing a patient answer in the affirmative “Do you want everything done?” compared with “I would not want to live if I could not take care of myself” was 18.8% (95% CI, 17.2–20.4%) versus 59.8% (95% CI, 57.6–62.0%) after controlling for all the other five attribute levels in the scenario: age greater than 80 years; survival prognosis less than 1%; length of ICU stay greater than 6 months; communication equals to unresponsive; and physical equals to bed bound. CONCLUSIONS: Using a discrete choice experiment survey, we estimated the impact of a commonly employed and poorly understood phrase physicians may use when discussing advance care plans with patients and their substitute decision makers on the subsequent withdraw life-sustaining therapies. This phrase is predicted to dramatically reduce the likelihood of withdraw life-sustaining therapy even in medically nonbeneficial scenarios and potentially contribute to low-value end-of-life care and outcomes. The immediate cessation of this term should be reinforced in medical training for all healthcare providers who participate in advance care planning. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7063893/ /pubmed/32166233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000052 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Report
DiDiodato, Giulio
Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect
title Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect
title_full Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect
title_fullStr Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect
title_short Estimating the Impact of Words Used by Physicians in Advance Care Planning Discussions: The “Do You Want Everything Done?” Effect
title_sort estimating the impact of words used by physicians in advance care planning discussions: the “do you want everything done?” effect
topic Original Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000052
work_keys_str_mv AT didiodatogiulio estimatingtheimpactofwordsusedbyphysiciansinadvancecareplanningdiscussionsthedoyouwanteverythingdoneeffect