Cargando…

Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES: Restrictive transfusion policies have been adopted in critical care, although these have not included patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We aimed to assess survival outcomes, adverse events related to RBC transfusion, and cost implications following a change from a “...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doyle, Andrew J., Richardson, Carla, Sanderson, Barnaby, Wong, Katie, Wyncoll, Duncan, Camporota, Luigi, Barrett, Nicholas A., Hunt, Beverley J., Retter, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000077
_version_ 1783504780222529536
author Doyle, Andrew J.
Richardson, Carla
Sanderson, Barnaby
Wong, Katie
Wyncoll, Duncan
Camporota, Luigi
Barrett, Nicholas A.
Hunt, Beverley J.
Retter, Andrew
author_facet Doyle, Andrew J.
Richardson, Carla
Sanderson, Barnaby
Wong, Katie
Wyncoll, Duncan
Camporota, Luigi
Barrett, Nicholas A.
Hunt, Beverley J.
Retter, Andrew
author_sort Doyle, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Restrictive transfusion policies have been adopted in critical care, although these have not included patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We aimed to assess survival outcomes, adverse events related to RBC transfusion, and cost implications following a change from a “liberal” to a “restrictive” RBC transfusion practice in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single high-volume tertiary critical care department at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients 16 years old or greater receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between 2011 and 2017 for more than 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical diagnoses, complications, outcomes, median hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels were obtained from patients’ electronic records. All laboratory results for hemoglobin and hematocrit were included. RBC transfusions were obtained from prescription charts. We included 402 patients: 99 during a “liberal” transfusion practice (2011–2014)—when the target hemoglobin level was greater than 100 g/L; and 303 treated during a “restrictive” transfusion practice (2014–2017) when the target hemoglobin level was greater than 80 g/L. We found that survival outcomes did not change following the implementation of a “restrictive” transfusion policy. There was also a decrease in the extracorporeal blood flow rates with restrictive transfusion of 0.5 L/min. Nonsurvivors of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation had higher usage of RBC units following a change in transfusion practice. The restrictive strategy allowed a cost saving of £454 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the adoption of a more restrictive approach to RBC transfusion during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is more cost-effective and associated with similar survival outcomes, than when compared with a more liberal approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7063903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70639032020-03-12 Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience Doyle, Andrew J. Richardson, Carla Sanderson, Barnaby Wong, Katie Wyncoll, Duncan Camporota, Luigi Barrett, Nicholas A. Hunt, Beverley J. Retter, Andrew Crit Care Explor Single-Center Quality Improvement Report OBJECTIVES: Restrictive transfusion policies have been adopted in critical care, although these have not included patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We aimed to assess survival outcomes, adverse events related to RBC transfusion, and cost implications following a change from a “liberal” to a “restrictive” RBC transfusion practice in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single high-volume tertiary critical care department at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients 16 years old or greater receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between 2011 and 2017 for more than 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical diagnoses, complications, outcomes, median hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels were obtained from patients’ electronic records. All laboratory results for hemoglobin and hematocrit were included. RBC transfusions were obtained from prescription charts. We included 402 patients: 99 during a “liberal” transfusion practice (2011–2014)—when the target hemoglobin level was greater than 100 g/L; and 303 treated during a “restrictive” transfusion practice (2014–2017) when the target hemoglobin level was greater than 80 g/L. We found that survival outcomes did not change following the implementation of a “restrictive” transfusion policy. There was also a decrease in the extracorporeal blood flow rates with restrictive transfusion of 0.5 L/min. Nonsurvivors of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation had higher usage of RBC units following a change in transfusion practice. The restrictive strategy allowed a cost saving of £454 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the adoption of a more restrictive approach to RBC transfusion during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is more cost-effective and associated with similar survival outcomes, than when compared with a more liberal approach. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7063903/ /pubmed/32166297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000077 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Single-Center Quality Improvement Report
Doyle, Andrew J.
Richardson, Carla
Sanderson, Barnaby
Wong, Katie
Wyncoll, Duncan
Camporota, Luigi
Barrett, Nicholas A.
Hunt, Beverley J.
Retter, Andrew
Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience
title Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort restrictive transfusion practice in adults receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a single-center experience
topic Single-Center Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7063903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32166297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000077
work_keys_str_mv AT doyleandrewj restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT richardsoncarla restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT sandersonbarnaby restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT wongkatie restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT wyncollduncan restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT camporotaluigi restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT barrettnicholasa restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT huntbeverleyj restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience
AT retterandrew restrictivetransfusionpracticeinadultsreceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenationasinglecenterexperience