Cargando…
Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review
AIM: The aims of this literature review were to better understand the current literature about person-centred care (PCC) and identify a clear definition of the term PCC relevant to nursing practice. METHOD/DATA SOURCES: An integrative literature review was undertaken using The Cumulative Index to Nu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229923 |
_version_ | 1783504831819808768 |
---|---|
author | Byrne, Amy-Louise Baldwin, Adele Harvey, Clare |
author_facet | Byrne, Amy-Louise Baldwin, Adele Harvey, Clare |
author_sort | Byrne, Amy-Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aims of this literature review were to better understand the current literature about person-centred care (PCC) and identify a clear definition of the term PCC relevant to nursing practice. METHOD/DATA SOURCES: An integrative literature review was undertaken using The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Scopus and Pubmed databases. The limitations were English language, full text articles published between 1998 and 2018 within Australian, New Zealand, Canada, USA, Europe, Ireland and UK were included. The international context off PCC is then specifically related to the Australian context. REVIEW METHODS: The review adopted a thematic analysis to categorise and summarise themes with reference to the concept of PCC. The review process also adhered to the Preferred Reporting System for Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and applied the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools to ensure the quality of the papers included for deeper analysis. RESULTS: While definitions of PCC do exist, there is no universally used definition within the nursing profession. This review has found three core themes which contribute to how PCC is understood and practiced, these are People, Practice and Power. This review uncovered a malalignment between the concept of PCC and the operationalisation of the term; this misalignment was discovered at both the practice level, and at the micro, meso and micro levels of the healthcare service. CONCLUSION: The concept of PCC is well known to nurses, yet ill-defined and operationalised into practice. PCC is potentially hindered by its apparent rhetorical nature, and further investigation of how PCC is valued and operationalised through its measurement and reported outcomes is needed. Investigation of the literature found many definitions of PCC, but no one universally accepted and used definition. Subsequently, PCC remains conceptional in nature, leading to disparity between how it is interpreted and operationalised within the healthcare system and within nursing services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7064187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70641872020-03-23 Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review Byrne, Amy-Louise Baldwin, Adele Harvey, Clare PLoS One Research Article AIM: The aims of this literature review were to better understand the current literature about person-centred care (PCC) and identify a clear definition of the term PCC relevant to nursing practice. METHOD/DATA SOURCES: An integrative literature review was undertaken using The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Scopus and Pubmed databases. The limitations were English language, full text articles published between 1998 and 2018 within Australian, New Zealand, Canada, USA, Europe, Ireland and UK were included. The international context off PCC is then specifically related to the Australian context. REVIEW METHODS: The review adopted a thematic analysis to categorise and summarise themes with reference to the concept of PCC. The review process also adhered to the Preferred Reporting System for Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and applied the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools to ensure the quality of the papers included for deeper analysis. RESULTS: While definitions of PCC do exist, there is no universally used definition within the nursing profession. This review has found three core themes which contribute to how PCC is understood and practiced, these are People, Practice and Power. This review uncovered a malalignment between the concept of PCC and the operationalisation of the term; this misalignment was discovered at both the practice level, and at the micro, meso and micro levels of the healthcare service. CONCLUSION: The concept of PCC is well known to nurses, yet ill-defined and operationalised into practice. PCC is potentially hindered by its apparent rhetorical nature, and further investigation of how PCC is valued and operationalised through its measurement and reported outcomes is needed. Investigation of the literature found many definitions of PCC, but no one universally accepted and used definition. Subsequently, PCC remains conceptional in nature, leading to disparity between how it is interpreted and operationalised within the healthcare system and within nursing services. Public Library of Science 2020-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7064187/ /pubmed/32155182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229923 Text en © 2020 Byrne et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Byrne, Amy-Louise Baldwin, Adele Harvey, Clare Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review |
title | Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review |
title_full | Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review |
title_fullStr | Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review |
title_short | Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review |
title_sort | whose centre is it anyway? defining person-centred care in nursing: an integrative review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32155182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byrneamylouise whosecentreisitanywaydefiningpersoncentredcareinnursinganintegrativereview AT baldwinadele whosecentreisitanywaydefiningpersoncentredcareinnursinganintegrativereview AT harveyclare whosecentreisitanywaydefiningpersoncentredcareinnursinganintegrativereview |