Cargando…
Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective
After introduction of the anticoccidial toltrazuril for the metaphylactic treatment of suckling piglet coccidiosis, only few field evaluations on the effect of treatment against the causative agent, Cystoisospora suis, were performed. In 2018, a field study was conducted to detect the presence of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00113 |
_version_ | 1783504874014507008 |
---|---|
author | Hinney, Barbara Cvjetković, Vojislav Espigares, David Vanhara, Jonas Waehner, Christoph Ruttkowski, Bärbel Selista, Radinka Sperling, Daniel Joachim, Anja |
author_facet | Hinney, Barbara Cvjetković, Vojislav Espigares, David Vanhara, Jonas Waehner, Christoph Ruttkowski, Bärbel Selista, Radinka Sperling, Daniel Joachim, Anja |
author_sort | Hinney, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | After introduction of the anticoccidial toltrazuril for the metaphylactic treatment of suckling piglet coccidiosis, only few field evaluations on the effect of treatment against the causative agent, Cystoisospora suis, were performed. In 2018, a field study was conducted to detect the presence of the parasite on pig farms in four different European countries, and to evaluate management parameters possibly associated with infection and disease. A total of 49 farms from Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany and Spain were included. Repeated pooled fecal samples from 603 litters were taken in the 2nd and 3rd week of life. Samples were examined by autofluorescence for the presence of C. suis, and fecal consistency was scored. For each farm a questionnaire was provided to document management and treatment history. Feces scored as diarrhoeic were not significantly more often positive for C. suis than non-diarrhoeic feces but samples from litters with previously reported occurrence of diarrhea were significantly more often positive (p = 0.000). Pasty feces were significantly more often positive than those of other consistency (p = 0.005). Overall, 71.4% of the farms and 50.1% of the litters were positive for C. suis at least once. The prevalence on the farms reached up to 100%. Diarrhea was seen in samples from 53.1% of the farms (9.6% of the litters). Cystoisospora suis was diagnosed on 80.8% of the farms with vs. 60.8% of those without diarrhea. Toltrazuril was applied on 30 farms, and of these 53.3% had diarrhoeic samples and 66.7% were positive for C. suis vs. 19 farms that did not use toltrazuril with 52.6% diarrhoeic and 79.0% C. suis positive samples (p > 0.05). Only on two farms a disinfectant with activity against coccidia was used, and C. suis was not detected there. Current control of C. suis appears to be insufficient on the majority of the examined farms. These findings highlight the importance of correct application of medication, and an effective hygiene management. To maintain effective parasite control, efficacy monitoring of the control measures should be implemented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7064465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70644652020-03-19 Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective Hinney, Barbara Cvjetković, Vojislav Espigares, David Vanhara, Jonas Waehner, Christoph Ruttkowski, Bärbel Selista, Radinka Sperling, Daniel Joachim, Anja Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science After introduction of the anticoccidial toltrazuril for the metaphylactic treatment of suckling piglet coccidiosis, only few field evaluations on the effect of treatment against the causative agent, Cystoisospora suis, were performed. In 2018, a field study was conducted to detect the presence of the parasite on pig farms in four different European countries, and to evaluate management parameters possibly associated with infection and disease. A total of 49 farms from Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany and Spain were included. Repeated pooled fecal samples from 603 litters were taken in the 2nd and 3rd week of life. Samples were examined by autofluorescence for the presence of C. suis, and fecal consistency was scored. For each farm a questionnaire was provided to document management and treatment history. Feces scored as diarrhoeic were not significantly more often positive for C. suis than non-diarrhoeic feces but samples from litters with previously reported occurrence of diarrhea were significantly more often positive (p = 0.000). Pasty feces were significantly more often positive than those of other consistency (p = 0.005). Overall, 71.4% of the farms and 50.1% of the litters were positive for C. suis at least once. The prevalence on the farms reached up to 100%. Diarrhea was seen in samples from 53.1% of the farms (9.6% of the litters). Cystoisospora suis was diagnosed on 80.8% of the farms with vs. 60.8% of those without diarrhea. Toltrazuril was applied on 30 farms, and of these 53.3% had diarrhoeic samples and 66.7% were positive for C. suis vs. 19 farms that did not use toltrazuril with 52.6% diarrhoeic and 79.0% C. suis positive samples (p > 0.05). Only on two farms a disinfectant with activity against coccidia was used, and C. suis was not detected there. Current control of C. suis appears to be insufficient on the majority of the examined farms. These findings highlight the importance of correct application of medication, and an effective hygiene management. To maintain effective parasite control, efficacy monitoring of the control measures should be implemented. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7064465/ /pubmed/32195274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00113 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hinney, Cvjetković, Espigares, Vanhara, Waehner, Ruttkowski, Selista, Sperling and Joachim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Hinney, Barbara Cvjetković, Vojislav Espigares, David Vanhara, Jonas Waehner, Christoph Ruttkowski, Bärbel Selista, Radinka Sperling, Daniel Joachim, Anja Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective |
title | Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective |
title_full | Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective |
title_fullStr | Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective |
title_full_unstemmed | Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective |
title_short | Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective |
title_sort | cystoisospora suis control in europe is not always effective |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinneybarbara cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT cvjetkovicvojislav cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT espigaresdavid cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT vanharajonas cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT waehnerchristoph cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT ruttkowskibarbel cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT selistaradinka cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT sperlingdaniel cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective AT joachimanja cystoisosporasuiscontrolineuropeisnotalwayseffective |