Cargando…
Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics—reasons for a conservative approach
Here, we summarise the unresolved debate about p value and its dichotomisation. We present the statement of the American Statistical Association against the misuse of statistical significance as well as the proposals to abandon the use of p value and to reduce the significance threshold from 0.05 to...
Autores principales: | Di Leo, Giovanni, Sardanelli, Francesco |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-0145-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Are Only p-Values Less Than 0.05 Significant? A p-Value Greater Than 0.05 Is Also Significant!
por: Kwak, Sanggyu
Publicado: (2023) -
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
por: Amrhein, Valentin, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods
por: White, Nicole M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporine Nanoemulsion 0.05% Compared with Topical Cyclosporine Emulsion 0.05% and Diquafosol 3% in Dry Eye
por: Park, Chang Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Origin of colossal dielectric permittivity of rutile Ti(0.9)In(0.05)Nb(0.05)O(2): single crystal and polycrystalline
por: Song, Yongli, et al.
Publicado: (2016)