Cargando…
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end diastolic volume (EDV) are measured using Simpson's biplane (SB), 3-dimensional method (3DE), and speckle tracking (STE). Comparisons between methods in routine practice are limited. Our purpose was to compare and to determine the co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8076582 |
_version_ | 1783504941949648896 |
---|---|
author | Benyounes, Nadia Van Der Vynckt, Clélie Tibi, Thierry Iglesias, Alexandra Gout, Olivier Lang, Sylvie Salomon, Laurence |
author_facet | Benyounes, Nadia Van Der Vynckt, Clélie Tibi, Thierry Iglesias, Alexandra Gout, Olivier Lang, Sylvie Salomon, Laurence |
author_sort | Benyounes, Nadia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end diastolic volume (EDV) are measured using Simpson's biplane (SB), 3-dimensional method (3DE), and speckle tracking (STE). Comparisons between methods in routine practice are limited. Our purpose was to compare and to determine the correlations between these three methods in clinical setting. METHODS: LVEF and EDV were measured by three methods in 474 consecutive patients and compared using multiple Bland–Altman (BA) plots. The correlations (R) between methods were calculated. RESULTS: Median (IQR) LVEF_SB, LVEF_STE, and LVEF_3DE were 63.0% (60–69)%, 61% (57–65)%, and 62% (57–68)%. Median (IQR) EDV_SB, EDV_STE, and EDV_3DE were 85 ml (71–106) ml, 82 ml (69–100) ml, and 73 ml (59–89) ml. R between LVEF_SB and LVEF_3DE was 0.65 when echogenicity was good and 0.43 when poor. R for EDV_SB and EDV_3DE was 0.75 when echogenicity was good and 0.45 when poor. On BA analysis, biases were acceptable (<3.5% for LVEF) but limits of agreement (LOA) were large: 95% of the differences were between −15.4% and +18.8% for LVEF as evaluated by SB in comparison with 3DE, with a bias of 1.7%. In the comparison EDV_SB and EDV_3DE, the bias was 14 ml and the LOA were between −24 ml and +53 ml. On linear regressions, LVEF_3DE = 17.92 + 0.69 LVEF_SB and EDV_3DE = 18.94 + 0.63 EDV_SB. CONCLUSIONS: The three methods were feasible and led to acceptable bias but large LOA. Although these methods are not interchangeable, our results allow 3DE value prediction from SB, the most commonly used method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7064836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70648362020-03-18 Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods Benyounes, Nadia Van Der Vynckt, Clélie Tibi, Thierry Iglesias, Alexandra Gout, Olivier Lang, Sylvie Salomon, Laurence Cardiol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end diastolic volume (EDV) are measured using Simpson's biplane (SB), 3-dimensional method (3DE), and speckle tracking (STE). Comparisons between methods in routine practice are limited. Our purpose was to compare and to determine the correlations between these three methods in clinical setting. METHODS: LVEF and EDV were measured by three methods in 474 consecutive patients and compared using multiple Bland–Altman (BA) plots. The correlations (R) between methods were calculated. RESULTS: Median (IQR) LVEF_SB, LVEF_STE, and LVEF_3DE were 63.0% (60–69)%, 61% (57–65)%, and 62% (57–68)%. Median (IQR) EDV_SB, EDV_STE, and EDV_3DE were 85 ml (71–106) ml, 82 ml (69–100) ml, and 73 ml (59–89) ml. R between LVEF_SB and LVEF_3DE was 0.65 when echogenicity was good and 0.43 when poor. R for EDV_SB and EDV_3DE was 0.75 when echogenicity was good and 0.45 when poor. On BA analysis, biases were acceptable (<3.5% for LVEF) but limits of agreement (LOA) were large: 95% of the differences were between −15.4% and +18.8% for LVEF as evaluated by SB in comparison with 3DE, with a bias of 1.7%. In the comparison EDV_SB and EDV_3DE, the bias was 14 ml and the LOA were between −24 ml and +53 ml. On linear regressions, LVEF_3DE = 17.92 + 0.69 LVEF_SB and EDV_3DE = 18.94 + 0.63 EDV_SB. CONCLUSIONS: The three methods were feasible and led to acceptable bias but large LOA. Although these methods are not interchangeable, our results allow 3DE value prediction from SB, the most commonly used method. Hindawi 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7064836/ /pubmed/32190384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8076582 Text en Copyright © 2020 Nadia Benyounes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Benyounes, Nadia Van Der Vynckt, Clélie Tibi, Thierry Iglesias, Alexandra Gout, Olivier Lang, Sylvie Salomon, Laurence Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods |
title | Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods |
title_full | Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods |
title_fullStr | Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods |
title_short | Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume and Ejection Fraction Calculation: Correlation between Three Echocardiographic Methods |
title_sort | left ventricular end diastolic volume and ejection fraction calculation: correlation between three echocardiographic methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8076582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benyounesnadia leftventricularenddiastolicvolumeandejectionfractioncalculationcorrelationbetweenthreeechocardiographicmethods AT vandervyncktclelie leftventricularenddiastolicvolumeandejectionfractioncalculationcorrelationbetweenthreeechocardiographicmethods AT tibithierry leftventricularenddiastolicvolumeandejectionfractioncalculationcorrelationbetweenthreeechocardiographicmethods AT iglesiasalexandra leftventricularenddiastolicvolumeandejectionfractioncalculationcorrelationbetweenthreeechocardiographicmethods AT goutolivier leftventricularenddiastolicvolumeandejectionfractioncalculationcorrelationbetweenthreeechocardiographicmethods AT langsylvie leftventricularenddiastolicvolumeandejectionfractioncalculationcorrelationbetweenthreeechocardiographicmethods AT salomonlaurence leftventricularenddiastolicvolumeandejectionfractioncalculationcorrelationbetweenthreeechocardiographicmethods |