Cargando…

Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Social and economic contexts shape children’s short- and long-term health. Efforts to address contextual risk factors are increasingly incorporated into pediatric health care. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 social risk–related interventions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gottlieb, Laura M., Adler, Nancy E., Wing, Holly, Velazquez, Denisse, Keeton, Victoria, Romero, Abigail, Hernandez, Maricarmen, Munoz Vera, Andrea, Urrutia Caceres, Elizabeth, Arevalo, Catherine, Herrera, Philip, Bernal Suarez, Mara, Hessler, Danielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0701
_version_ 1783504950798581760
author Gottlieb, Laura M.
Adler, Nancy E.
Wing, Holly
Velazquez, Denisse
Keeton, Victoria
Romero, Abigail
Hernandez, Maricarmen
Munoz Vera, Andrea
Urrutia Caceres, Elizabeth
Arevalo, Catherine
Herrera, Philip
Bernal Suarez, Mara
Hessler, Danielle
author_facet Gottlieb, Laura M.
Adler, Nancy E.
Wing, Holly
Velazquez, Denisse
Keeton, Victoria
Romero, Abigail
Hernandez, Maricarmen
Munoz Vera, Andrea
Urrutia Caceres, Elizabeth
Arevalo, Catherine
Herrera, Philip
Bernal Suarez, Mara
Hessler, Danielle
author_sort Gottlieb, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Social and economic contexts shape children’s short- and long-term health. Efforts to address contextual risk factors are increasingly incorporated into pediatric health care. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 social risk–related interventions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial included English- and/or Spanish-speaking caregiver-child dyads recruited from a pediatric urgent care clinic nested in a large, urban, safety-net hospital. Study recruitment, enrollment, and follow-up were conducted from July 18, 2016, to March 8, 2019. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2019, to January 20, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Following standardized social risk assessment, caregivers were randomly assigned to receive either written information regarding relevant government and community social services resources or comparable written information plus in-person assistance and follow-up focused on service access. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Caregiver-reported number of social risk factors and child health 6 months after enrollment. RESULTS: Among 611 caregiver-child dyads enrolled in the study, 302 dyads were randomized to the written resources group and 309 dyads were randomized to the written resources plus in-person assistance group. The mean (SD) age of children was 6.1 (5.0) years; 483 children (79.1%) were Hispanic; and 315 children (51.6%) were girls. There were no significant differences between groups in the effects of the interventions. In post hoc secondary analyses, the number of reported social risks decreased from baseline to 6-month follow-up in both groups: caregivers who received written resources alone reported a mean (SE) of 1.28 (0.19) fewer risks at follow-up, while those receiving written resources plus in-person assistance reported 1.74 (0.21) fewer risks at follow-up (both P < .001). In both groups, there were small but statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up in child health (mean [SE] change: written resources, 0.37 [0.07]; written resources plus in-person assistance, 0.24 [0.07]; both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial compared 2 approaches to addressing social risks in a pediatric urgent care setting and found no statistically significant differences in the social risk and child and caregiver health effects of providing written resources at the point of care with vs without in-person longitudinal navigation services. Caregivers in both groups reported fewer social risks and improved child and caregiver health 6 months after the intervention. These findings deepen understanding of effective doses of social risk–related interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02746393
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7064877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70648772020-03-16 Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial Gottlieb, Laura M. Adler, Nancy E. Wing, Holly Velazquez, Denisse Keeton, Victoria Romero, Abigail Hernandez, Maricarmen Munoz Vera, Andrea Urrutia Caceres, Elizabeth Arevalo, Catherine Herrera, Philip Bernal Suarez, Mara Hessler, Danielle JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Social and economic contexts shape children’s short- and long-term health. Efforts to address contextual risk factors are increasingly incorporated into pediatric health care. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 social risk–related interventions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial included English- and/or Spanish-speaking caregiver-child dyads recruited from a pediatric urgent care clinic nested in a large, urban, safety-net hospital. Study recruitment, enrollment, and follow-up were conducted from July 18, 2016, to March 8, 2019. Data analysis was conducted from January 1, 2019, to January 20, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Following standardized social risk assessment, caregivers were randomly assigned to receive either written information regarding relevant government and community social services resources or comparable written information plus in-person assistance and follow-up focused on service access. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Caregiver-reported number of social risk factors and child health 6 months after enrollment. RESULTS: Among 611 caregiver-child dyads enrolled in the study, 302 dyads were randomized to the written resources group and 309 dyads were randomized to the written resources plus in-person assistance group. The mean (SD) age of children was 6.1 (5.0) years; 483 children (79.1%) were Hispanic; and 315 children (51.6%) were girls. There were no significant differences between groups in the effects of the interventions. In post hoc secondary analyses, the number of reported social risks decreased from baseline to 6-month follow-up in both groups: caregivers who received written resources alone reported a mean (SE) of 1.28 (0.19) fewer risks at follow-up, while those receiving written resources plus in-person assistance reported 1.74 (0.21) fewer risks at follow-up (both P < .001). In both groups, there were small but statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up in child health (mean [SE] change: written resources, 0.37 [0.07]; written resources plus in-person assistance, 0.24 [0.07]; both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial compared 2 approaches to addressing social risks in a pediatric urgent care setting and found no statistically significant differences in the social risk and child and caregiver health effects of providing written resources at the point of care with vs without in-person longitudinal navigation services. Caregivers in both groups reported fewer social risks and improved child and caregiver health 6 months after the intervention. These findings deepen understanding of effective doses of social risk–related interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02746393 American Medical Association 2020-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7064877/ /pubmed/32154888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0701 Text en Copyright 2020 Gottlieb LM et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Gottlieb, Laura M.
Adler, Nancy E.
Wing, Holly
Velazquez, Denisse
Keeton, Victoria
Romero, Abigail
Hernandez, Maricarmen
Munoz Vera, Andrea
Urrutia Caceres, Elizabeth
Arevalo, Catherine
Herrera, Philip
Bernal Suarez, Mara
Hessler, Danielle
Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effects of in-person assistance vs personalized written resources about social services on household social risks and child and caregiver health: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0701
work_keys_str_mv AT gottlieblauram effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT adlernancye effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wingholly effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT velazquezdenisse effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT keetonvictoria effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT romeroabigail effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hernandezmaricarmen effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT munozveraandrea effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT urrutiacacereselizabeth effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT arevalocatherine effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT herreraphilip effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bernalsuarezmara effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hesslerdanielle effectsofinpersonassistancevspersonalizedwrittenresourcesaboutsocialservicesonhouseholdsocialrisksandchildandcaregiverhealtharandomizedclinicaltrial