Cargando…

Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints

This study explored age‐related differences in motor planning as expressed in arm‐hand kinematics during a sequential peg moving task with varying demands on goal insertion complexity (second‐order planning). The peg was a vertical cylinder with either a circular or semicircular base. The task was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domellöf, Erik, Bäckström, Anna, Johansson, Anna‐Maria, Rönnqvist, Louise, von Hofsten, Claes, Rosander, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31502277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.21911
_version_ 1783504963983376384
author Domellöf, Erik
Bäckström, Anna
Johansson, Anna‐Maria
Rönnqvist, Louise
von Hofsten, Claes
Rosander, Kerstin
author_facet Domellöf, Erik
Bäckström, Anna
Johansson, Anna‐Maria
Rönnqvist, Louise
von Hofsten, Claes
Rosander, Kerstin
author_sort Domellöf, Erik
collection PubMed
description This study explored age‐related differences in motor planning as expressed in arm‐hand kinematics during a sequential peg moving task with varying demands on goal insertion complexity (second‐order planning). The peg was a vertical cylinder with either a circular or semicircular base. The task was to transport the peg between two positions and rotate it various amounts horizontally before fitting into its final position. The amount of rotation required was either 0°, 90°, 180°, or −90°. The reaching for the peg, the displacement of it, and the way the rotation was accomplished was analyzed. Assessments of end state comfort, goal interpretation errors, and type of grip used were also included. Participants were two groups of typically developing children, one younger (M (age) = 6.7 years) and one older (M (age) = 10.3 years), and one adult group (M (age) = 34.9 years). The children, particularly 6‐year‐olds, displayed less efficient prehensile movement organization than adults. Related to less efficient motor planning, 6‐year‐olds, mainly, had shorter reach‐to‐grasp onset latencies, higher velocities, and shorter time to peak velocities, and longer grasp durations than adults. Importantly, the adults rotated the peg during transport. In contrast, the children made corrective rotations after the hand had arrived at the goal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7064938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70649382020-03-16 Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints Domellöf, Erik Bäckström, Anna Johansson, Anna‐Maria Rönnqvist, Louise von Hofsten, Claes Rosander, Kerstin Dev Psychobiol Research Articles This study explored age‐related differences in motor planning as expressed in arm‐hand kinematics during a sequential peg moving task with varying demands on goal insertion complexity (second‐order planning). The peg was a vertical cylinder with either a circular or semicircular base. The task was to transport the peg between two positions and rotate it various amounts horizontally before fitting into its final position. The amount of rotation required was either 0°, 90°, 180°, or −90°. The reaching for the peg, the displacement of it, and the way the rotation was accomplished was analyzed. Assessments of end state comfort, goal interpretation errors, and type of grip used were also included. Participants were two groups of typically developing children, one younger (M (age) = 6.7 years) and one older (M (age) = 10.3 years), and one adult group (M (age) = 34.9 years). The children, particularly 6‐year‐olds, displayed less efficient prehensile movement organization than adults. Related to less efficient motor planning, 6‐year‐olds, mainly, had shorter reach‐to‐grasp onset latencies, higher velocities, and shorter time to peak velocities, and longer grasp durations than adults. Importantly, the adults rotated the peg during transport. In contrast, the children made corrective rotations after the hand had arrived at the goal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-09 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7064938/ /pubmed/31502277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.21911 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Developmental Psychobiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Domellöf, Erik
Bäckström, Anna
Johansson, Anna‐Maria
Rönnqvist, Louise
von Hofsten, Claes
Rosander, Kerstin
Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints
title Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints
title_full Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints
title_fullStr Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints
title_full_unstemmed Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints
title_short Kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints
title_sort kinematic characteristics of second‐order motor planning and performance in 6‐ and 10‐year‐old children and adults: effects of age and task constraints
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7064938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31502277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dev.21911
work_keys_str_mv AT domelloferik kinematiccharacteristicsofsecondordermotorplanningandperformancein6and10yearoldchildrenandadultseffectsofageandtaskconstraints
AT backstromanna kinematiccharacteristicsofsecondordermotorplanningandperformancein6and10yearoldchildrenandadultseffectsofageandtaskconstraints
AT johanssonannamaria kinematiccharacteristicsofsecondordermotorplanningandperformancein6and10yearoldchildrenandadultseffectsofageandtaskconstraints
AT ronnqvistlouise kinematiccharacteristicsofsecondordermotorplanningandperformancein6and10yearoldchildrenandadultseffectsofageandtaskconstraints
AT vonhofstenclaes kinematiccharacteristicsofsecondordermotorplanningandperformancein6and10yearoldchildrenandadultseffectsofageandtaskconstraints
AT rosanderkerstin kinematiccharacteristicsofsecondordermotorplanningandperformancein6and10yearoldchildrenandadultseffectsofageandtaskconstraints