Cargando…

Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model

OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous recovery is an important determinant of upper extremity recovery after stroke and has been described by the 70% proportional recovery rule for the Fugl–Meyer motor upper extremity (FM‐UE) scale. However, this rule is criticized for overestimating the predictability of FM‐UE re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Vliet, Rick, Selles, Ruud W., Andrinopoulou, Eleni‐Rosalina, Nijland, Rinske, Ribbers, Gerard M., Frens, Maarten A., Meskers, Carel, Kwakkel, Gert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31925838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25679
_version_ 1783504981992669184
author van der Vliet, Rick
Selles, Ruud W.
Andrinopoulou, Eleni‐Rosalina
Nijland, Rinske
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Frens, Maarten A.
Meskers, Carel
Kwakkel, Gert
author_facet van der Vliet, Rick
Selles, Ruud W.
Andrinopoulou, Eleni‐Rosalina
Nijland, Rinske
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Frens, Maarten A.
Meskers, Carel
Kwakkel, Gert
author_sort van der Vliet, Rick
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous recovery is an important determinant of upper extremity recovery after stroke and has been described by the 70% proportional recovery rule for the Fugl–Meyer motor upper extremity (FM‐UE) scale. However, this rule is criticized for overestimating the predictability of FM‐UE recovery. Our objectives were to develop a longitudinal mixture model of FM‐UE recovery, identify FM‐UE recovery subgroups, and internally validate the model predictions. METHODS: We developed an exponential recovery function with the following parameters: subgroup assignment probability, proportional recovery coefficient r(k), time constant in weeks τ(k), and distribution of the initial FM‐UE scores. We fitted the model to FM‐UE measurements of 412 first‐ever ischemic stroke patients and cross‐validated endpoint predictions and FM‐UE recovery cluster assignment. RESULTS: The model distinguished 5 subgroups with different recovery parameters (r(1) = 0.09, τ(1) = 5.3, r(2) = 0.46, τ(2) = 10.1, r(3) = 0.86, τ(3) = 9.8, r(4) = 0.89, τ(4) = 2.7, r(5) = 0.93, τ(5) = 1.2). Endpoint FM‐UE was predicted with a median absolute error of 4.8 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.3–12.8) at 1 week poststroke and 4.2 (IQR = 1.3–9.8) at 2 weeks. Overall accuracy of assignment to the poor (subgroup 1), moderate (subgroups 2 and 3), and good (subgroups 4 and 5) FM‐UE recovery clusters was 0.79 (95% equal‐tailed interval [ETI] = 0.78–0.80) at 1 week poststroke and 0.81 (95% ETI = 0.80–0.82) at 2 weeks. INTERPRETATION: FM‐UE recovery reflects different subgroups, each with its own recovery profile. Cross‐validation indicates that FM‐UE endpoints and FM‐UE recovery clusters can be well predicted. Results will contribute to the understanding of upper limb recovery patterns in the first 6 months after stroke. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:383–393 Ann Neurol 2020;87:383–393
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7065018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70650182020-03-16 Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model van der Vliet, Rick Selles, Ruud W. Andrinopoulou, Eleni‐Rosalina Nijland, Rinske Ribbers, Gerard M. Frens, Maarten A. Meskers, Carel Kwakkel, Gert Ann Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous recovery is an important determinant of upper extremity recovery after stroke and has been described by the 70% proportional recovery rule for the Fugl–Meyer motor upper extremity (FM‐UE) scale. However, this rule is criticized for overestimating the predictability of FM‐UE recovery. Our objectives were to develop a longitudinal mixture model of FM‐UE recovery, identify FM‐UE recovery subgroups, and internally validate the model predictions. METHODS: We developed an exponential recovery function with the following parameters: subgroup assignment probability, proportional recovery coefficient r(k), time constant in weeks τ(k), and distribution of the initial FM‐UE scores. We fitted the model to FM‐UE measurements of 412 first‐ever ischemic stroke patients and cross‐validated endpoint predictions and FM‐UE recovery cluster assignment. RESULTS: The model distinguished 5 subgroups with different recovery parameters (r(1) = 0.09, τ(1) = 5.3, r(2) = 0.46, τ(2) = 10.1, r(3) = 0.86, τ(3) = 9.8, r(4) = 0.89, τ(4) = 2.7, r(5) = 0.93, τ(5) = 1.2). Endpoint FM‐UE was predicted with a median absolute error of 4.8 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.3–12.8) at 1 week poststroke and 4.2 (IQR = 1.3–9.8) at 2 weeks. Overall accuracy of assignment to the poor (subgroup 1), moderate (subgroups 2 and 3), and good (subgroups 4 and 5) FM‐UE recovery clusters was 0.79 (95% equal‐tailed interval [ETI] = 0.78–0.80) at 1 week poststroke and 0.81 (95% ETI = 0.80–0.82) at 2 weeks. INTERPRETATION: FM‐UE recovery reflects different subgroups, each with its own recovery profile. Cross‐validation indicates that FM‐UE endpoints and FM‐UE recovery clusters can be well predicted. Results will contribute to the understanding of upper limb recovery patterns in the first 6 months after stroke. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:383–393 Ann Neurol 2020;87:383–393 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-01-25 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7065018/ /pubmed/31925838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25679 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
van der Vliet, Rick
Selles, Ruud W.
Andrinopoulou, Eleni‐Rosalina
Nijland, Rinske
Ribbers, Gerard M.
Frens, Maarten A.
Meskers, Carel
Kwakkel, Gert
Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model
title Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model
title_full Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model
title_fullStr Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model
title_short Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model
title_sort predicting upper limb motor impairment recovery after stroke: a mixture model
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31925838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25679
work_keys_str_mv AT vandervlietrick predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel
AT sellesruudw predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel
AT andrinopoulouelenirosalina predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel
AT nijlandrinske predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel
AT ribbersgerardm predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel
AT frensmaartena predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel
AT meskerscarel predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel
AT kwakkelgert predictingupperlimbmotorimpairmentrecoveryafterstrokeamixturemodel