Cargando…

Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities

Drying is one of the treatment techniques used for the dual purpose of safe disposal and energy recovery of faecal sludge (FS). Limited data are available regarding the FS drying process. In this paper the drying properties of FS were investigated using samples from ventilated improved pit (VIP) lat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Getahun, Samuel, Septien, Santiago, Mata, Jaime, Somorin, Tosin, Mabbett, Ian, Buckley, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110267
_version_ 1783504984778735616
author Getahun, Samuel
Septien, Santiago
Mata, Jaime
Somorin, Tosin
Mabbett, Ian
Buckley, Christopher
author_facet Getahun, Samuel
Septien, Santiago
Mata, Jaime
Somorin, Tosin
Mabbett, Ian
Buckley, Christopher
author_sort Getahun, Samuel
collection PubMed
description Drying is one of the treatment techniques used for the dual purpose of safe disposal and energy recovery of faecal sludge (FS). Limited data are available regarding the FS drying process. In this paper the drying properties of FS were investigated using samples from ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrines and urine diversion dry toilets (UDDT) and an anaerobic baffle reactor (ABR) from a decentralized wastewater treatment systems. Moisture content, total solids content, volatile solids content, water activity, coupled thermogravimetry & differential thermal analysis (TGA-DTA) and calorific value tests were used to characterize FS drying. Drying kinetics and water activity measured at different moisture content during drying (100 °C) were similar for the samples from different on-site sanitation facilities. Experimental heat of drying results revealed that FS requires two to three times that of the latent heat of vaporization of water for drying. Drying temperature was more significant than the sludge source in determining the final volatile solids content of the dried samples. This was reinforced by the dynamic TGA that showed considerable thermal degradation (2–11% dry solid mass) near 200 °C. Below 200 C, the calorific value of the dried samples exhibited no significant difference. The average calorific values of VIP, UDDT and ABR samples at 100 °C were 14.78, 15.70, 17.26 MJ/kg dry solid, respectively. This suggests that the fuel value of FS from the aforementioned sanitation facilities will not be significantly affected by drying temperature below 200 °C. Based on this study, the most suitable temperature for drying of FS for a solid fuel application was found to be 150 °C.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7065040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70650402020-05-01 Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities Getahun, Samuel Septien, Santiago Mata, Jaime Somorin, Tosin Mabbett, Ian Buckley, Christopher J Environ Manage Article Drying is one of the treatment techniques used for the dual purpose of safe disposal and energy recovery of faecal sludge (FS). Limited data are available regarding the FS drying process. In this paper the drying properties of FS were investigated using samples from ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrines and urine diversion dry toilets (UDDT) and an anaerobic baffle reactor (ABR) from a decentralized wastewater treatment systems. Moisture content, total solids content, volatile solids content, water activity, coupled thermogravimetry & differential thermal analysis (TGA-DTA) and calorific value tests were used to characterize FS drying. Drying kinetics and water activity measured at different moisture content during drying (100 °C) were similar for the samples from different on-site sanitation facilities. Experimental heat of drying results revealed that FS requires two to three times that of the latent heat of vaporization of water for drying. Drying temperature was more significant than the sludge source in determining the final volatile solids content of the dried samples. This was reinforced by the dynamic TGA that showed considerable thermal degradation (2–11% dry solid mass) near 200 °C. Below 200 C, the calorific value of the dried samples exhibited no significant difference. The average calorific values of VIP, UDDT and ABR samples at 100 °C were 14.78, 15.70, 17.26 MJ/kg dry solid, respectively. This suggests that the fuel value of FS from the aforementioned sanitation facilities will not be significantly affected by drying temperature below 200 °C. Based on this study, the most suitable temperature for drying of FS for a solid fuel application was found to be 150 °C. Academic Press 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7065040/ /pubmed/32148321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110267 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Getahun, Samuel
Septien, Santiago
Mata, Jaime
Somorin, Tosin
Mabbett, Ian
Buckley, Christopher
Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities
title Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities
title_full Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities
title_fullStr Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities
title_full_unstemmed Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities
title_short Drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities
title_sort drying characteristics of faecal sludge from different on-site sanitation facilities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110267
work_keys_str_mv AT getahunsamuel dryingcharacteristicsoffaecalsludgefromdifferentonsitesanitationfacilities
AT septiensantiago dryingcharacteristicsoffaecalsludgefromdifferentonsitesanitationfacilities
AT matajaime dryingcharacteristicsoffaecalsludgefromdifferentonsitesanitationfacilities
AT somorintosin dryingcharacteristicsoffaecalsludgefromdifferentonsitesanitationfacilities
AT mabbettian dryingcharacteristicsoffaecalsludgefromdifferentonsitesanitationfacilities
AT buckleychristopher dryingcharacteristicsoffaecalsludgefromdifferentonsitesanitationfacilities