Cargando…

Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma

Melanoma is among the few cancers that demonstrate an increasing incidence over time. Simultaneously, this trend has been marked by an epidemiologic shift to earlier stage at diagnosis. Before 2011, treatment options were limited for patients with metastatic disease, and the median overall survival...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poklepovic, Andrew S., Luke, Jason J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31869447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32585
_version_ 1783504998201556992
author Poklepovic, Andrew S.
Luke, Jason J.
author_facet Poklepovic, Andrew S.
Luke, Jason J.
author_sort Poklepovic, Andrew S.
collection PubMed
description Melanoma is among the few cancers that demonstrate an increasing incidence over time. Simultaneously, this trend has been marked by an epidemiologic shift to earlier stage at diagnosis. Before 2011, treatment options were limited for patients with metastatic disease, and the median overall survival was less than 1 year. Since then, the field of melanoma therapeutics has undergone major changes. The use of anti–CTLA‐4 and anti‐PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitors and combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF V600 mutations has significantly extended survival and allowed some patients to remain in durable disease remission off therapy. It has now been confirmed that these classes of agents have a benefit for patients with stage III melanoma after surgical resection, and anti‐PD1 and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are standards of care in this setting. Some patients with stage II disease (lymph node‐negative; American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIB and IIC) have worse melanoma‐specific survival relative to some patients with stage III disease. Given these results, expanding the population of patients who are considered for adjuvant therapy to include those with stage II melanoma has become a priority, and randomized phase 3 clinical trials are underway. Moving into the future, the validation of patient risk‐stratification and treatment‐benefit prediction models will be important to improve the number needed to treat and limit exposure to toxicity in the large population of patients with early stage melanoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7065103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70651032020-03-16 Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma Poklepovic, Andrew S. Luke, Jason J. Cancer Review Article Melanoma is among the few cancers that demonstrate an increasing incidence over time. Simultaneously, this trend has been marked by an epidemiologic shift to earlier stage at diagnosis. Before 2011, treatment options were limited for patients with metastatic disease, and the median overall survival was less than 1 year. Since then, the field of melanoma therapeutics has undergone major changes. The use of anti–CTLA‐4 and anti‐PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitors and combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF V600 mutations has significantly extended survival and allowed some patients to remain in durable disease remission off therapy. It has now been confirmed that these classes of agents have a benefit for patients with stage III melanoma after surgical resection, and anti‐PD1 and BRAF/MEK inhibitors are standards of care in this setting. Some patients with stage II disease (lymph node‐negative; American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIB and IIC) have worse melanoma‐specific survival relative to some patients with stage III disease. Given these results, expanding the population of patients who are considered for adjuvant therapy to include those with stage II melanoma has become a priority, and randomized phase 3 clinical trials are underway. Moving into the future, the validation of patient risk‐stratification and treatment‐benefit prediction models will be important to improve the number needed to treat and limit exposure to toxicity in the large population of patients with early stage melanoma. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-23 2020-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7065103/ /pubmed/31869447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32585 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Article
Poklepovic, Andrew S.
Luke, Jason J.
Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma
title Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma
title_full Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma
title_fullStr Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma
title_short Considering adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma
title_sort considering adjuvant therapy for stage ii melanoma
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31869447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32585
work_keys_str_mv AT poklepovicandrews consideringadjuvanttherapyforstageiimelanoma
AT lukejasonj consideringadjuvanttherapyforstageiimelanoma