Cargando…

Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma

Pathogenic somatic missense mutations within the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain define the important subtype of ultramutated tumours (‘POLE‐ultramutated’) within the novel molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, clinical implementation of this classifier re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: León‐Castillo, Alicia, Britton, Heidi, McConechy, Melissa K, McAlpine, Jessica N, Nout, Remi, Kommoss, Stefan, Brucker, Sara Y, Carlson, Joseph W, Epstein, Elisabeth, Rau, Tilman T, Bosse, Tjalling, Church, David N, Gilks, C Blake
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5372
_version_ 1783505013838970880
author León‐Castillo, Alicia
Britton, Heidi
McConechy, Melissa K
McAlpine, Jessica N
Nout, Remi
Kommoss, Stefan
Brucker, Sara Y
Carlson, Joseph W
Epstein, Elisabeth
Rau, Tilman T
Bosse, Tjalling
Church, David N
Gilks, C Blake
author_facet León‐Castillo, Alicia
Britton, Heidi
McConechy, Melissa K
McAlpine, Jessica N
Nout, Remi
Kommoss, Stefan
Brucker, Sara Y
Carlson, Joseph W
Epstein, Elisabeth
Rau, Tilman T
Bosse, Tjalling
Church, David N
Gilks, C Blake
author_sort León‐Castillo, Alicia
collection PubMed
description Pathogenic somatic missense mutations within the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain define the important subtype of ultramutated tumours (‘POLE‐ultramutated’) within the novel molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, clinical implementation of this classifier requires systematic evaluation of the pathogenicity of POLE mutations. To address this, we examined base changes, tumour mutational burden (TMB), DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) status, POLE variant frequency, and the results from six in silico tools on 82 ECs with whole‐exome sequencing from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Of these, 41 had one of five known pathogenic POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) and showed characteristic genomic alterations: C>A substitution > 20%, T>G substitutions > 4%, C>G substitutions < 0.6%, indels < 5%, TMB > 100 mut/Mb. A scoring system to assess these alterations (POLE‐score) was developed; based on their scores, 7/18 (39%) additional tumours with EDM were classified as POLE‐ultramutated ECs, and the six POLE mutations present in these tumours were considered pathogenic. Only 1/23 (4%) tumours with non‐EDM showed these genomic alterations, indicating that a large majority of mutations outside the exonuclease domain are not pathogenic. The infrequent combination of MSI‐H with POLE EDM led us to investigate the clinical significance of this association. Tumours with pathogenic POLE EDM co‐existent with MSI‐H showed genomic alterations characteristic of POLE‐ultramutated ECs. In a pooled analysis of 3361 ECs, 13 ECs with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/MSI‐H and a pathogenic POLE EDM had a 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of 92.3%, comparable to previously reported POLE‐ultramutated ECs. Additionally, 14 cases with non‐pathogenic POLE EDM and MMRd/MSI‐H had a 5‐year RFS of 76.2%, similar to MMRd/MSI‐H, POLE wild‐type ECs, suggesting that these should be categorised as MMRd, rather than POLE‐ultramutated ECs for prognostication. This work provides guidance on classification of ECs with POLE mutations, facilitating implementation of POLE testing in routine clinical care. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7065171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70651712020-03-16 Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma León‐Castillo, Alicia Britton, Heidi McConechy, Melissa K McAlpine, Jessica N Nout, Remi Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Bosse, Tjalling Church, David N Gilks, C Blake J Pathol Original Papers Pathogenic somatic missense mutations within the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain define the important subtype of ultramutated tumours (‘POLE‐ultramutated’) within the novel molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, clinical implementation of this classifier requires systematic evaluation of the pathogenicity of POLE mutations. To address this, we examined base changes, tumour mutational burden (TMB), DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) status, POLE variant frequency, and the results from six in silico tools on 82 ECs with whole‐exome sequencing from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Of these, 41 had one of five known pathogenic POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) and showed characteristic genomic alterations: C>A substitution > 20%, T>G substitutions > 4%, C>G substitutions < 0.6%, indels < 5%, TMB > 100 mut/Mb. A scoring system to assess these alterations (POLE‐score) was developed; based on their scores, 7/18 (39%) additional tumours with EDM were classified as POLE‐ultramutated ECs, and the six POLE mutations present in these tumours were considered pathogenic. Only 1/23 (4%) tumours with non‐EDM showed these genomic alterations, indicating that a large majority of mutations outside the exonuclease domain are not pathogenic. The infrequent combination of MSI‐H with POLE EDM led us to investigate the clinical significance of this association. Tumours with pathogenic POLE EDM co‐existent with MSI‐H showed genomic alterations characteristic of POLE‐ultramutated ECs. In a pooled analysis of 3361 ECs, 13 ECs with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/MSI‐H and a pathogenic POLE EDM had a 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of 92.3%, comparable to previously reported POLE‐ultramutated ECs. Additionally, 14 cases with non‐pathogenic POLE EDM and MMRd/MSI‐H had a 5‐year RFS of 76.2%, similar to MMRd/MSI‐H, POLE wild‐type ECs, suggesting that these should be categorised as MMRd, rather than POLE‐ultramutated ECs for prognostication. This work provides guidance on classification of ECs with POLE mutations, facilitating implementation of POLE testing in routine clinical care. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-01-29 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7065171/ /pubmed/31829442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5372 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
León‐Castillo, Alicia
Britton, Heidi
McConechy, Melissa K
McAlpine, Jessica N
Nout, Remi
Kommoss, Stefan
Brucker, Sara Y
Carlson, Joseph W
Epstein, Elisabeth
Rau, Tilman T
Bosse, Tjalling
Church, David N
Gilks, C Blake
Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
title Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
title_full Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
title_fullStr Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
title_short Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
title_sort interpretation of somatic pole mutations in endometrial carcinoma
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5372
work_keys_str_mv AT leoncastilloalicia interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT brittonheidi interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT mcconechymelissak interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT mcalpinejessican interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT noutremi interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT kommossstefan interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT bruckersaray interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT carlsonjosephw interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT epsteinelisabeth interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT rautilmant interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT bossetjalling interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT churchdavidn interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma
AT gilkscblake interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma