Cargando…
Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma
Pathogenic somatic missense mutations within the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain define the important subtype of ultramutated tumours (‘POLE‐ultramutated’) within the novel molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, clinical implementation of this classifier re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5372 |
_version_ | 1783505013838970880 |
---|---|
author | León‐Castillo, Alicia Britton, Heidi McConechy, Melissa K McAlpine, Jessica N Nout, Remi Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Bosse, Tjalling Church, David N Gilks, C Blake |
author_facet | León‐Castillo, Alicia Britton, Heidi McConechy, Melissa K McAlpine, Jessica N Nout, Remi Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Bosse, Tjalling Church, David N Gilks, C Blake |
author_sort | León‐Castillo, Alicia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pathogenic somatic missense mutations within the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain define the important subtype of ultramutated tumours (‘POLE‐ultramutated’) within the novel molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, clinical implementation of this classifier requires systematic evaluation of the pathogenicity of POLE mutations. To address this, we examined base changes, tumour mutational burden (TMB), DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) status, POLE variant frequency, and the results from six in silico tools on 82 ECs with whole‐exome sequencing from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Of these, 41 had one of five known pathogenic POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) and showed characteristic genomic alterations: C>A substitution > 20%, T>G substitutions > 4%, C>G substitutions < 0.6%, indels < 5%, TMB > 100 mut/Mb. A scoring system to assess these alterations (POLE‐score) was developed; based on their scores, 7/18 (39%) additional tumours with EDM were classified as POLE‐ultramutated ECs, and the six POLE mutations present in these tumours were considered pathogenic. Only 1/23 (4%) tumours with non‐EDM showed these genomic alterations, indicating that a large majority of mutations outside the exonuclease domain are not pathogenic. The infrequent combination of MSI‐H with POLE EDM led us to investigate the clinical significance of this association. Tumours with pathogenic POLE EDM co‐existent with MSI‐H showed genomic alterations characteristic of POLE‐ultramutated ECs. In a pooled analysis of 3361 ECs, 13 ECs with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/MSI‐H and a pathogenic POLE EDM had a 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of 92.3%, comparable to previously reported POLE‐ultramutated ECs. Additionally, 14 cases with non‐pathogenic POLE EDM and MMRd/MSI‐H had a 5‐year RFS of 76.2%, similar to MMRd/MSI‐H, POLE wild‐type ECs, suggesting that these should be categorised as MMRd, rather than POLE‐ultramutated ECs for prognostication. This work provides guidance on classification of ECs with POLE mutations, facilitating implementation of POLE testing in routine clinical care. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7065171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70651712020-03-16 Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma León‐Castillo, Alicia Britton, Heidi McConechy, Melissa K McAlpine, Jessica N Nout, Remi Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Bosse, Tjalling Church, David N Gilks, C Blake J Pathol Original Papers Pathogenic somatic missense mutations within the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain define the important subtype of ultramutated tumours (‘POLE‐ultramutated’) within the novel molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC). However, clinical implementation of this classifier requires systematic evaluation of the pathogenicity of POLE mutations. To address this, we examined base changes, tumour mutational burden (TMB), DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) status, POLE variant frequency, and the results from six in silico tools on 82 ECs with whole‐exome sequencing from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Of these, 41 had one of five known pathogenic POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) and showed characteristic genomic alterations: C>A substitution > 20%, T>G substitutions > 4%, C>G substitutions < 0.6%, indels < 5%, TMB > 100 mut/Mb. A scoring system to assess these alterations (POLE‐score) was developed; based on their scores, 7/18 (39%) additional tumours with EDM were classified as POLE‐ultramutated ECs, and the six POLE mutations present in these tumours were considered pathogenic. Only 1/23 (4%) tumours with non‐EDM showed these genomic alterations, indicating that a large majority of mutations outside the exonuclease domain are not pathogenic. The infrequent combination of MSI‐H with POLE EDM led us to investigate the clinical significance of this association. Tumours with pathogenic POLE EDM co‐existent with MSI‐H showed genomic alterations characteristic of POLE‐ultramutated ECs. In a pooled analysis of 3361 ECs, 13 ECs with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/MSI‐H and a pathogenic POLE EDM had a 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of 92.3%, comparable to previously reported POLE‐ultramutated ECs. Additionally, 14 cases with non‐pathogenic POLE EDM and MMRd/MSI‐H had a 5‐year RFS of 76.2%, similar to MMRd/MSI‐H, POLE wild‐type ECs, suggesting that these should be categorised as MMRd, rather than POLE‐ultramutated ECs for prognostication. This work provides guidance on classification of ECs with POLE mutations, facilitating implementation of POLE testing in routine clinical care. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-01-29 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7065171/ /pubmed/31829442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5372 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers León‐Castillo, Alicia Britton, Heidi McConechy, Melissa K McAlpine, Jessica N Nout, Remi Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Bosse, Tjalling Church, David N Gilks, C Blake Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma |
title | Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma |
title_full | Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma |
title_short | Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma |
title_sort | interpretation of somatic pole mutations in endometrial carcinoma |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leoncastilloalicia interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT brittonheidi interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT mcconechymelissak interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT mcalpinejessican interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT noutremi interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT kommossstefan interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT bruckersaray interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT carlsonjosephw interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT epsteinelisabeth interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT rautilmant interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT bossetjalling interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT churchdavidn interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma AT gilkscblake interpretationofsomaticpolemutationsinendometrialcarcinoma |