Cargando…
Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas
Endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular classification based on four molecular subclasses identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has gained relevance in recent years due to its prognostic utility and potential to predict benefit from adjuvant treatment. While most ECs can be classified based on a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5373 |
_version_ | 1783505016608260096 |
---|---|
author | León‐Castillo, Alicia Gilvazquez, Ester Nout, Remi Smit, Vincent THBM McAlpine, Jessica N McConechy, Melissa Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Soslow, Robert A Ganesan, Raji Matias‐Guiu, Xavier Oliva, Esther Harrison, Beth T Church, David N Gilks, C Blake Bosse, Tjalling |
author_facet | León‐Castillo, Alicia Gilvazquez, Ester Nout, Remi Smit, Vincent THBM McAlpine, Jessica N McConechy, Melissa Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Soslow, Robert A Ganesan, Raji Matias‐Guiu, Xavier Oliva, Esther Harrison, Beth T Church, David N Gilks, C Blake Bosse, Tjalling |
author_sort | León‐Castillo, Alicia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular classification based on four molecular subclasses identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has gained relevance in recent years due to its prognostic utility and potential to predict benefit from adjuvant treatment. While most ECs can be classified based on a single classifier (POLE exonuclease domain mutations – POLEmut, MMR deficiency – MMRd, p53 abnormal – p53abn), a small but clinically relevant group of tumours harbour more than one molecular classifying feature and are referred to as ‘multiple‐classifier’ ECs. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of multiple‐classifier ECs with abnormal p53 (p53abn). Within a cohort of 3518 molecularly profiled ECs, 107 (3%) tumours displayed p53abn in addition to another classifier(s), including 64 with MMRd (MMRd–p53abn), 31 with POLEmut (POLEmut–p53abn), and 12 with all three aberrations (MMRd–POLEmut–p53abn). MMRd–p53abn ECs and POLEmut–p53abn ECs were mostly grade 3 endometrioid ECs, early stage, and frequently showed morphological features characteristic of MMRd or POLEmut ECs. 18/28 (60%) MMRd–p53abn ECs and 7/15 (46.7%) POLEmut–p53abn ECs showed subclonal p53 overexpression, suggesting that TP53 mutation was a secondary event acquired during tumour progression. Hierarchical clustering of TCGA ECs by single nucleotide variant (SNV) type and somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) revealed that MMRd–p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single‐classifier MMRd tumours (20/23) rather than single‐classifier p53abn tumours (3/23), while POLEmut–p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single‐classifier POLEmut tumours (12/13) and seldom with single‐classifier p53abn tumours (1/13) (both p ≤ 0.001, chi‐squared test). Finally, the clinical outcome of patients with MMRd–p53abn and POLEmut–p53abn ECs [stage I 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of 92.2% and 94.1%, respectively] was significantly different from single‐classifier p53abn EC (stage I RFS 70.8%, p = 0.024 and p = 0.050, respectively). Our results support the classification of MMRd–p53abn EC as MMRd and POLEmut–p53abn EC as POLEmut. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7065184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70651842020-03-16 Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas León‐Castillo, Alicia Gilvazquez, Ester Nout, Remi Smit, Vincent THBM McAlpine, Jessica N McConechy, Melissa Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Soslow, Robert A Ganesan, Raji Matias‐Guiu, Xavier Oliva, Esther Harrison, Beth T Church, David N Gilks, C Blake Bosse, Tjalling J Pathol Original Papers Endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular classification based on four molecular subclasses identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has gained relevance in recent years due to its prognostic utility and potential to predict benefit from adjuvant treatment. While most ECs can be classified based on a single classifier (POLE exonuclease domain mutations – POLEmut, MMR deficiency – MMRd, p53 abnormal – p53abn), a small but clinically relevant group of tumours harbour more than one molecular classifying feature and are referred to as ‘multiple‐classifier’ ECs. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of multiple‐classifier ECs with abnormal p53 (p53abn). Within a cohort of 3518 molecularly profiled ECs, 107 (3%) tumours displayed p53abn in addition to another classifier(s), including 64 with MMRd (MMRd–p53abn), 31 with POLEmut (POLEmut–p53abn), and 12 with all three aberrations (MMRd–POLEmut–p53abn). MMRd–p53abn ECs and POLEmut–p53abn ECs were mostly grade 3 endometrioid ECs, early stage, and frequently showed morphological features characteristic of MMRd or POLEmut ECs. 18/28 (60%) MMRd–p53abn ECs and 7/15 (46.7%) POLEmut–p53abn ECs showed subclonal p53 overexpression, suggesting that TP53 mutation was a secondary event acquired during tumour progression. Hierarchical clustering of TCGA ECs by single nucleotide variant (SNV) type and somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) revealed that MMRd–p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single‐classifier MMRd tumours (20/23) rather than single‐classifier p53abn tumours (3/23), while POLEmut–p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single‐classifier POLEmut tumours (12/13) and seldom with single‐classifier p53abn tumours (1/13) (both p ≤ 0.001, chi‐squared test). Finally, the clinical outcome of patients with MMRd–p53abn and POLEmut–p53abn ECs [stage I 5‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS) of 92.2% and 94.1%, respectively] was significantly different from single‐classifier p53abn EC (stage I RFS 70.8%, p = 0.024 and p = 0.050, respectively). Our results support the classification of MMRd–p53abn EC as MMRd and POLEmut–p53abn EC as POLEmut. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2020-01-12 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7065184/ /pubmed/31829447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5373 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers León‐Castillo, Alicia Gilvazquez, Ester Nout, Remi Smit, Vincent THBM McAlpine, Jessica N McConechy, Melissa Kommoss, Stefan Brucker, Sara Y Carlson, Joseph W Epstein, Elisabeth Rau, Tilman T Soslow, Robert A Ganesan, Raji Matias‐Guiu, Xavier Oliva, Esther Harrison, Beth T Church, David N Gilks, C Blake Bosse, Tjalling Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas |
title | Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas |
title_full | Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas |
title_fullStr | Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas |
title_short | Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas |
title_sort | clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of ‘multiple‐classifier’ endometrial carcinomas |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leoncastilloalicia clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT gilvazquezester clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT noutremi clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT smitvincentthbm clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT mcalpinejessican clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT mcconechymelissa clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT kommossstefan clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT bruckersaray clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT carlsonjosephw clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT epsteinelisabeth clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT rautilmant clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT soslowroberta clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT ganesanraji clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT matiasguiuxavier clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT olivaesther clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT harrisonbetht clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT churchdavidn clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT gilkscblake clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas AT bossetjalling clinicopathologicalandmolecularcharacterisationofmultipleclassifierendometrialcarcinomas |