Cargando…

QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation

BACKGROUND: The relationship between electrocardiographic evaluation and circadian blood pressure (BP) variation in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 171 hypertensive patients were included in the study. First, patients were divided into a young and mid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Liyuan, Jin, Jianling, Jiang, Shili, Zhu, Wei, Gao, Meiwen, Zhao, Xin, Yuan, Jiamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0021
_version_ 1783505062401671168
author Yan, Liyuan
Jin, Jianling
Jiang, Shili
Zhu, Wei
Gao, Meiwen
Zhao, Xin
Yuan, Jiamin
author_facet Yan, Liyuan
Jin, Jianling
Jiang, Shili
Zhu, Wei
Gao, Meiwen
Zhao, Xin
Yuan, Jiamin
author_sort Yan, Liyuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship between electrocardiographic evaluation and circadian blood pressure (BP) variation in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 171 hypertensive patients were included in the study. First, patients were divided into a young and middle-aged group and an elderly group. The two groups were then separately classified into three subgroups on the basis of circadian variation of BP as dippers, non-dippers and reverse-dippers. The electrocardiographic evaluation was calculated from 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). RESULTS: QTc intervals were shortest in the dippers and longest in the reverse-dippers in the young and middle-aged group (QTc dipper: 416.53±18.37ms; non-dipper: 438.30±29.71ms; reverse-dipper: 444.93±25.47ms; for dipper vs non-dipper, and dipper vs reverse-dipper P<0.05). QTc interval was found to be an independent risk factor for the non-dipper BP pattern (Odds ratio 1.049; 95% CI 1.01-1.089; P=0.012) and reverse-dipper BP pattern (Odds ratio 1.051; 95% CI 1.007-1.098; P=0.023) in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients. No significant differences in other ECG parameters were found among the three subgroups in the young and middle-aged group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that QTc interval might serve as a risk factor for non-dipper BP pattern and reverse-dipper BP pattern in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7065424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70654242020-03-18 QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation Yan, Liyuan Jin, Jianling Jiang, Shili Zhu, Wei Gao, Meiwen Zhao, Xin Yuan, Jiamin Open Med (Wars) Research Article BACKGROUND: The relationship between electrocardiographic evaluation and circadian blood pressure (BP) variation in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 171 hypertensive patients were included in the study. First, patients were divided into a young and middle-aged group and an elderly group. The two groups were then separately classified into three subgroups on the basis of circadian variation of BP as dippers, non-dippers and reverse-dippers. The electrocardiographic evaluation was calculated from 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). RESULTS: QTc intervals were shortest in the dippers and longest in the reverse-dippers in the young and middle-aged group (QTc dipper: 416.53±18.37ms; non-dipper: 438.30±29.71ms; reverse-dipper: 444.93±25.47ms; for dipper vs non-dipper, and dipper vs reverse-dipper P<0.05). QTc interval was found to be an independent risk factor for the non-dipper BP pattern (Odds ratio 1.049; 95% CI 1.01-1.089; P=0.012) and reverse-dipper BP pattern (Odds ratio 1.051; 95% CI 1.007-1.098; P=0.023) in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients. No significant differences in other ECG parameters were found among the three subgroups in the young and middle-aged group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that QTc interval might serve as a risk factor for non-dipper BP pattern and reverse-dipper BP pattern in young and middle-aged hypertensive patients. De Gruyter 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7065424/ /pubmed/32190737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0021 Text en © 2020 Liyuan Yan et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yan, Liyuan
Jin, Jianling
Jiang, Shili
Zhu, Wei
Gao, Meiwen
Zhao, Xin
Yuan, Jiamin
QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation
title QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation
title_full QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation
title_fullStr QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation
title_full_unstemmed QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation
title_short QTc Interval Predicts Disturbed Circadian Blood Pressure Variation
title_sort qtc interval predicts disturbed circadian blood pressure variation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0021
work_keys_str_mv AT yanliyuan qtcintervalpredictsdisturbedcircadianbloodpressurevariation
AT jinjianling qtcintervalpredictsdisturbedcircadianbloodpressurevariation
AT jiangshili qtcintervalpredictsdisturbedcircadianbloodpressurevariation
AT zhuwei qtcintervalpredictsdisturbedcircadianbloodpressurevariation
AT gaomeiwen qtcintervalpredictsdisturbedcircadianbloodpressurevariation
AT zhaoxin qtcintervalpredictsdisturbedcircadianbloodpressurevariation
AT yuanjiamin qtcintervalpredictsdisturbedcircadianbloodpressurevariation