Cargando…

Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study

Professionalism is a critical competency for emergency medicine (EM) physicians, and professional behavior affects patient satisfaction. However, the findings of various studies indicate that there are differences in the interpretation of professionalism among EM resident physicians and faculty phys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shiga, Takashi, Nakashima, Yoshiyuki, Norisue, Yasuhiro, Ikegami, Tetsunori, Uechi, Takahiro, Otaki, Yuhei, Nakano, Hidehiko, Ryu, Keibun, Wakai, Shinjiro, Funakoshi, Hiraku, Fujitani, Shigeki, Tokuda, Yasuharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230186
_version_ 1783505116230320128
author Shiga, Takashi
Nakashima, Yoshiyuki
Norisue, Yasuhiro
Ikegami, Tetsunori
Uechi, Takahiro
Otaki, Yuhei
Nakano, Hidehiko
Ryu, Keibun
Wakai, Shinjiro
Funakoshi, Hiraku
Fujitani, Shigeki
Tokuda, Yasuharu
author_facet Shiga, Takashi
Nakashima, Yoshiyuki
Norisue, Yasuhiro
Ikegami, Tetsunori
Uechi, Takahiro
Otaki, Yuhei
Nakano, Hidehiko
Ryu, Keibun
Wakai, Shinjiro
Funakoshi, Hiraku
Fujitani, Shigeki
Tokuda, Yasuharu
author_sort Shiga, Takashi
collection PubMed
description Professionalism is a critical competency for emergency medicine (EM) physicians, and professional behavior affects patient satisfaction. However, the findings of various studies indicate that there are differences in the interpretation of professionalism among EM resident physicians and faculty physicians. Using a cross-sectional survey, we aimed to analyze common challenges to medical professionalism for Japanese EM physicians and survey the extent of professionalism coursework completed during undergraduate medical education. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey of EM resident physicians and faculty physicians at academic conferences and eight teaching hospitals in Japan using the questionnaire by Barry and colleagues. We analyzed the frequency of providing either the best or second-best answers to each scenario as the main outcome measure and compared the frequencies between EM resident physicians and EM faculty physicians. Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyze data. A total of 176 physicians (86 EM resident physicians and 90 EM faculty physicians) completed the survey. The response rate was 92.6%. The most challenging scenario presented to participants dealt with sexual harassment, and only 44.5% chose the best or second-best answers, followed by poor responses to the confidentiality scenario (69.9%). The frequency of either the best or second-best responses to the confidentiality scenario was significantly greater for EM resident physicians than for EM faculty physicians (77.1% versus 62.9%, p = 0.048). More participants in the EM resident physician group completed formal courses in medical professionalism than those in the EM faculty physician group (25.8% versus 5.5%, p < 0.01). Further, EM faculty physicians were less likely than EM resident physicians to provide acceptable responses in terms of confidentiality, and few of both had received professionalism training through school curricula. Continuous professionalism education focused on the prevention of sexual harassment and gender gap is needed for both EM resident physicians and faculty physicians in Japan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7065769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70657692020-03-23 Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study Shiga, Takashi Nakashima, Yoshiyuki Norisue, Yasuhiro Ikegami, Tetsunori Uechi, Takahiro Otaki, Yuhei Nakano, Hidehiko Ryu, Keibun Wakai, Shinjiro Funakoshi, Hiraku Fujitani, Shigeki Tokuda, Yasuharu PLoS One Research Article Professionalism is a critical competency for emergency medicine (EM) physicians, and professional behavior affects patient satisfaction. However, the findings of various studies indicate that there are differences in the interpretation of professionalism among EM resident physicians and faculty physicians. Using a cross-sectional survey, we aimed to analyze common challenges to medical professionalism for Japanese EM physicians and survey the extent of professionalism coursework completed during undergraduate medical education. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey of EM resident physicians and faculty physicians at academic conferences and eight teaching hospitals in Japan using the questionnaire by Barry and colleagues. We analyzed the frequency of providing either the best or second-best answers to each scenario as the main outcome measure and compared the frequencies between EM resident physicians and EM faculty physicians. Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to analyze data. A total of 176 physicians (86 EM resident physicians and 90 EM faculty physicians) completed the survey. The response rate was 92.6%. The most challenging scenario presented to participants dealt with sexual harassment, and only 44.5% chose the best or second-best answers, followed by poor responses to the confidentiality scenario (69.9%). The frequency of either the best or second-best responses to the confidentiality scenario was significantly greater for EM resident physicians than for EM faculty physicians (77.1% versus 62.9%, p = 0.048). More participants in the EM resident physician group completed formal courses in medical professionalism than those in the EM faculty physician group (25.8% versus 5.5%, p < 0.01). Further, EM faculty physicians were less likely than EM resident physicians to provide acceptable responses in terms of confidentiality, and few of both had received professionalism training through school curricula. Continuous professionalism education focused on the prevention of sexual harassment and gender gap is needed for both EM resident physicians and faculty physicians in Japan. Public Library of Science 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7065769/ /pubmed/32160256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230186 Text en © 2020 Shiga et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shiga, Takashi
Nakashima, Yoshiyuki
Norisue, Yasuhiro
Ikegami, Tetsunori
Uechi, Takahiro
Otaki, Yuhei
Nakano, Hidehiko
Ryu, Keibun
Wakai, Shinjiro
Funakoshi, Hiraku
Fujitani, Shigeki
Tokuda, Yasuharu
Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_full Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_short Comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: A multicenter cross-sectional study
title_sort comparison of professionalism between emergency medicine resident physicians and faculty physicians: a multicenter cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230186
work_keys_str_mv AT shigatakashi comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT nakashimayoshiyuki comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT norisueyasuhiro comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT ikegamitetsunori comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT uechitakahiro comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT otakiyuhei comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT nakanohidehiko comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT ryukeibun comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT wakaishinjiro comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT funakoshihiraku comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT fujitanishigeki comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy
AT tokudayasuharu comparisonofprofessionalismbetweenemergencymedicineresidentphysiciansandfacultyphysiciansamulticentercrosssectionalstudy