Cargando…
A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia
BACKGROUND: Nalbuphine has been suggested to be used for post-cesarean section (CS) intravenous analgesia. However, ideal concentration of nalbuphine for such analgesia remains unclear. The present study was conducted to explore an ideal concentration of nalbuphine for post-CS intravenous analgesia...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000678 |
_version_ | 1783505136984784896 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Chun-Yun Li, Shu-Xi Yang, Mei-Juan Xu, Li-Li Chen, Xin-Zhong |
author_facet | Huang, Chun-Yun Li, Shu-Xi Yang, Mei-Juan Xu, Li-Li Chen, Xin-Zhong |
author_sort | Huang, Chun-Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nalbuphine has been suggested to be used for post-cesarean section (CS) intravenous analgesia. However, ideal concentration of nalbuphine for such analgesia remains unclear. The present study was conducted to explore an ideal concentration of nalbuphine for post-CS intravenous analgesia by evaluating the analgesic effects and side-effects of three different concentrations of nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-CS intravenous analgesia in healthy parturients. METHODS: One-hundred-and-fourteen parturients undergoing elective CS were randomly allocated to one of three groups (38 subjects per group) according to an Excel-generated random number sheet to receive hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.5 mg/mL (group LN), hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.7 mg/mL (group MN), and hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.9 mg/mL (group HN) using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, PCA bolus demands, cumulative PCA dose, satisfaction score, Ramsay score, and side-effects such as urinary retention were recorded. RESULTS: The number of PCA bolus demands and cumulative PCA dose during the first 48 h after CS were significantly higher in group LN (21 ± 16 bolus, 129 ± 25 mL) than those in group MN (15 ± 10 bolus, 120 ± 16 mL) (both P < 0.05) and group HN (13 ± 9 bolus, 117 ± 13 mL) (both P < 0.01), but no difference was found between group HN and group MN (both P > 0.05). VAS scores were significantly lower in group HN than those in group MN and group LN for uterine cramping pain at rest and after breast-feeding within 12 h after CS (all P < 0.01) and VAS scores were significantly higher in group LN than those in group MN and group HN when oxytocin was intravenously infused within 3 days after CS (all P < 0.05), whereas VAS scores were not statistically different among groups for incisional pain (all P > 0.05). Ramsay sedation scale score in group HN was significantly higher than that in group MN at 8 and 12 h after CS (all P < 0.01) and group LN at 4, 8, 12, 24 h after CS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.7 mg/mL for intravenous PCA could effectively improve the incisional pain and uterine cramping pain management and improve comfort in patients after CS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1800015014, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7065868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70658682020-03-24 A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia Huang, Chun-Yun Li, Shu-Xi Yang, Mei-Juan Xu, Li-Li Chen, Xin-Zhong Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Nalbuphine has been suggested to be used for post-cesarean section (CS) intravenous analgesia. However, ideal concentration of nalbuphine for such analgesia remains unclear. The present study was conducted to explore an ideal concentration of nalbuphine for post-CS intravenous analgesia by evaluating the analgesic effects and side-effects of three different concentrations of nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-CS intravenous analgesia in healthy parturients. METHODS: One-hundred-and-fourteen parturients undergoing elective CS were randomly allocated to one of three groups (38 subjects per group) according to an Excel-generated random number sheet to receive hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.5 mg/mL (group LN), hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.7 mg/mL (group MN), and hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.9 mg/mL (group HN) using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, PCA bolus demands, cumulative PCA dose, satisfaction score, Ramsay score, and side-effects such as urinary retention were recorded. RESULTS: The number of PCA bolus demands and cumulative PCA dose during the first 48 h after CS were significantly higher in group LN (21 ± 16 bolus, 129 ± 25 mL) than those in group MN (15 ± 10 bolus, 120 ± 16 mL) (both P < 0.05) and group HN (13 ± 9 bolus, 117 ± 13 mL) (both P < 0.01), but no difference was found between group HN and group MN (both P > 0.05). VAS scores were significantly lower in group HN than those in group MN and group LN for uterine cramping pain at rest and after breast-feeding within 12 h after CS (all P < 0.01) and VAS scores were significantly higher in group LN than those in group MN and group HN when oxytocin was intravenously infused within 3 days after CS (all P < 0.05), whereas VAS scores were not statistically different among groups for incisional pain (all P > 0.05). Ramsay sedation scale score in group HN was significantly higher than that in group MN at 8 and 12 h after CS (all P < 0.01) and group LN at 4, 8, 12, 24 h after CS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hydromorphone 0.05 mg/mL + nalbuphine 0.7 mg/mL for intravenous PCA could effectively improve the incisional pain and uterine cramping pain management and improve comfort in patients after CS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1800015014, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-03-05 2020-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7065868/ /pubmed/32142492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000678 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Huang, Chun-Yun Li, Shu-Xi Yang, Mei-Juan Xu, Li-Li Chen, Xin-Zhong A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
title | A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
title_full | A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
title_short | A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
title_sort | comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7065868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangchunyun acomparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT lishuxi acomparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT yangmeijuan acomparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT xulili acomparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT chenxinzhong acomparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT huangchunyun comparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT lishuxi comparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT yangmeijuan comparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT xulili comparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia AT chenxinzhong comparativestudyofthreeconcentrationsofintravenousnalbuphinecombinedwithhydromorphoneforpostcesareandeliveryanalgesia |