Cargando…

Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study

The growth of research in the field of exercise oncology has resulted in a large evidence base for the role of physical activity in preventing and managing cancer outcomes. Nonetheless, there remain many unanswered questions across the multidisciplinary field. This study aimed to determine the prior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Mhairi, Crank, Helen, Loosemore, Mike, Stevinson, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201540
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.42992
_version_ 1783505154698379264
author Morris, Mhairi
Crank, Helen
Loosemore, Mike
Stevinson, Clare
author_facet Morris, Mhairi
Crank, Helen
Loosemore, Mike
Stevinson, Clare
author_sort Morris, Mhairi
collection PubMed
description The growth of research in the field of exercise oncology has resulted in a large evidence base for the role of physical activity in preventing and managing cancer outcomes. Nonetheless, there remain many unanswered questions across the multidisciplinary field. This study aimed to determine the priority research questions within exercise oncology using a systematic consensus method. Forty-seven exercise oncology experts engaged in the five-step process of the Nominal Group Technique to generate a list of research questions in small groups and rank the 10 most important. One hundred questions resulted from the process and fifteen received total scores (sum of ranks) of at least 50 from a maximum score of 470. The highest ranked question (score of 125) related to the identification of functional markers of recovery. The next five questions concerned minimum exercise parameters, health professional education, translation of behavioural interventions, effects of exercise on the tumour microenvironment and development of in vitro models to study the impact of exercise on cancer cell growth and metastasis. The study has demonstrated the importance of future research across all disciplinary areas of exercise oncology and identified the priority questions to which resources might be directed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7066012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70660122020-03-20 Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study Morris, Mhairi Crank, Helen Loosemore, Mike Stevinson, Clare J Cancer Research Paper The growth of research in the field of exercise oncology has resulted in a large evidence base for the role of physical activity in preventing and managing cancer outcomes. Nonetheless, there remain many unanswered questions across the multidisciplinary field. This study aimed to determine the priority research questions within exercise oncology using a systematic consensus method. Forty-seven exercise oncology experts engaged in the five-step process of the Nominal Group Technique to generate a list of research questions in small groups and rank the 10 most important. One hundred questions resulted from the process and fifteen received total scores (sum of ranks) of at least 50 from a maximum score of 470. The highest ranked question (score of 125) related to the identification of functional markers of recovery. The next five questions concerned minimum exercise parameters, health professional education, translation of behavioural interventions, effects of exercise on the tumour microenvironment and development of in vitro models to study the impact of exercise on cancer cell growth and metastasis. The study has demonstrated the importance of future research across all disciplinary areas of exercise oncology and identified the priority questions to which resources might be directed. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7066012/ /pubmed/32201540 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.42992 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Morris, Mhairi
Crank, Helen
Loosemore, Mike
Stevinson, Clare
Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study
title Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study
title_full Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study
title_fullStr Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study
title_short Identification of Research Priorities in Exercise Oncology: A Consensus Study
title_sort identification of research priorities in exercise oncology: a consensus study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201540
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.42992
work_keys_str_mv AT morrismhairi identificationofresearchprioritiesinexerciseoncologyaconsensusstudy
AT crankhelen identificationofresearchprioritiesinexerciseoncologyaconsensusstudy
AT loosemoremike identificationofresearchprioritiesinexerciseoncologyaconsensusstudy
AT stevinsonclare identificationofresearchprioritiesinexerciseoncologyaconsensusstudy