Cargando…

Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score

Background: Clinical-pathological factors and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) influence adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decision for early breast cancer patients. We investigated the decision-making of ACT in patients with discordant risk classifications of clinical-pathological factors and RS. Methods: P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Weiqi, Lin, Lin, Fei, Xiaochun, Chen, Xiaosong, Shen, Kunwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201521
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.38976
_version_ 1783505155641049088
author Gao, Weiqi
Lin, Lin
Fei, Xiaochun
Chen, Xiaosong
Shen, Kunwei
author_facet Gao, Weiqi
Lin, Lin
Fei, Xiaochun
Chen, Xiaosong
Shen, Kunwei
author_sort Gao, Weiqi
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical-pathological factors and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) influence adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decision for early breast cancer patients. We investigated the decision-making of ACT in patients with discordant risk classifications of clinical-pathological factors and RS. Methods: Patients with hormonal receptor (HR)+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, early breast cancer, who underwent 21-gene RS testing were identified from Ruijin Hospital (RJBC) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. According to Adjuvant! Online and RS (≤25 or >25), discordant risk classifications were defined as: clinical low-risk/ RS high-risk (C-low/ RS-high) and clinical high-risk/ RS low-risk (C-high/RS-low). McNemar's test was used to assess the changes between pre- and post-RS recommendations. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Among 727 RJBC patients, the C-low/RS-high group and the C-high/RS-low group represented 19.7% and 21.3% of the cohort. After receiving 21-gene RS results, treatment recommendations were changed for 22.1% patients with discordant risk classifications: ACT rate increased from 41.9% to 75.5% in the C-low/RS-high group and decreased from 63.9% to 60.0% in the C-high/RS-low group. Among 2958 patients from the SEER cohort, 18.4% of the C-high/RS-low group and 59.2% of the C-low/RS-high group received ACT. There was no significant difference in the estimated 3-year BCSS between ACT or not among the C-low/RS-high group (p=0.708) and the C-high/RS-low groups (p=0.391). Conclusion: For patients with discordant risk classifications, physicians were apt to adopt the 21-gene RS rather than routine clinical-pathological factors to guide ACT selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7066016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70660162020-03-20 Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score Gao, Weiqi Lin, Lin Fei, Xiaochun Chen, Xiaosong Shen, Kunwei J Cancer Research Paper Background: Clinical-pathological factors and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) influence adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decision for early breast cancer patients. We investigated the decision-making of ACT in patients with discordant risk classifications of clinical-pathological factors and RS. Methods: Patients with hormonal receptor (HR)+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, early breast cancer, who underwent 21-gene RS testing were identified from Ruijin Hospital (RJBC) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. According to Adjuvant! Online and RS (≤25 or >25), discordant risk classifications were defined as: clinical low-risk/ RS high-risk (C-low/ RS-high) and clinical high-risk/ RS low-risk (C-high/RS-low). McNemar's test was used to assess the changes between pre- and post-RS recommendations. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Among 727 RJBC patients, the C-low/RS-high group and the C-high/RS-low group represented 19.7% and 21.3% of the cohort. After receiving 21-gene RS results, treatment recommendations were changed for 22.1% patients with discordant risk classifications: ACT rate increased from 41.9% to 75.5% in the C-low/RS-high group and decreased from 63.9% to 60.0% in the C-high/RS-low group. Among 2958 patients from the SEER cohort, 18.4% of the C-high/RS-low group and 59.2% of the C-low/RS-high group received ACT. There was no significant difference in the estimated 3-year BCSS between ACT or not among the C-low/RS-high group (p=0.708) and the C-high/RS-low groups (p=0.391). Conclusion: For patients with discordant risk classifications, physicians were apt to adopt the 21-gene RS rather than routine clinical-pathological factors to guide ACT selection. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7066016/ /pubmed/32201521 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.38976 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Gao, Weiqi
Lin, Lin
Fei, Xiaochun
Chen, Xiaosong
Shen, Kunwei
Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score
title Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score
title_full Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score
title_fullStr Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score
title_full_unstemmed Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score
title_short Decision-making of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients with Discordant Risk Classifications between Clinical-Pathological Factors and 21-gene Recurrence Score
title_sort decision-making of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients with discordant risk classifications between clinical-pathological factors and 21-gene recurrence score
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32201521
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.38976
work_keys_str_mv AT gaoweiqi decisionmakingofadjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerpatientswithdiscordantriskclassificationsbetweenclinicalpathologicalfactorsand21generecurrencescore
AT linlin decisionmakingofadjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerpatientswithdiscordantriskclassificationsbetweenclinicalpathologicalfactorsand21generecurrencescore
AT feixiaochun decisionmakingofadjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerpatientswithdiscordantriskclassificationsbetweenclinicalpathologicalfactorsand21generecurrencescore
AT chenxiaosong decisionmakingofadjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerpatientswithdiscordantriskclassificationsbetweenclinicalpathologicalfactorsand21generecurrencescore
AT shenkunwei decisionmakingofadjuvantchemotherapyforbreastcancerpatientswithdiscordantriskclassificationsbetweenclinicalpathologicalfactorsand21generecurrencescore