Cargando…

Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding

Phase II studies on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should define the dose with the best balance between efficacy and safety (“optimal dose”). Their key role is based on dose selection for subsequent pivotal studies (phase III, field studies). Since products for AIT differ in composition and unit defin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleine-Tebbe, J., Kaul, S., Mösges, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176223
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX02033E
_version_ 1783505291837440000
author Kleine-Tebbe, J.
Kaul, S.
Mösges, R.
author_facet Kleine-Tebbe, J.
Kaul, S.
Mösges, R.
author_sort Kleine-Tebbe, J.
collection PubMed
description Phase II studies on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should define the dose with the best balance between efficacy and safety (“optimal dose”). Their key role is based on dose selection for subsequent pivotal studies (phase III, field studies). Since products for AIT differ in composition and unit definitions, phase II trials are mandatory for new products and preparations being developed according to the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance (“Therapie-Allergeneverordnung”, TAV) due to current EMA guidelines since 2009. The latter permit various in-vivo models and endpoints for phase II studies, e.g., AIT-induced changes in skin test, nasal, conjunctival or bronchial provocation, or in exposure chamber or field trials. Selection and graduation of the doses, minimization of placebo effects, and sufficient numbers of patients are a challenge. Effort, required time, and costs are important variables for the initiators of phase II trials. Risks are characterized by e.g., a) too small doses without relevant differences compared to placebo, b) missing true dose-response relationships, c) strong placebo effect and consequently small “therapeutic window”, d) large heterogeneity and missing distinct differences (compared to placebo), e) too small effects in field studies due to low allergen exposure, f) missing dose-related increase (in case of too high doses). In the view of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, the unambiguous phase II trials with TAV products performed until today were not able to confirm the marketed doses for AIT. Regardless of the utilized model, more raw and single data should illustrate the individual outcome of AIT during phase II trials, facilitating an improved and more intuitive interpretation of the data (placebo effects? scattering?). In the medium term, evidence regarding AIT efficacy will considerably increase due to phase II trials as a prerequisite for subsequent phase III field studies. This affects all manufacturers offering AIT products in Germany and Europe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7066681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70666812020-03-13 Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding Kleine-Tebbe, J. Kaul, S. Mösges, R. Allergol Select Review Article Phase II studies on allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should define the dose with the best balance between efficacy and safety (“optimal dose”). Their key role is based on dose selection for subsequent pivotal studies (phase III, field studies). Since products for AIT differ in composition and unit definitions, phase II trials are mandatory for new products and preparations being developed according to the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance (“Therapie-Allergeneverordnung”, TAV) due to current EMA guidelines since 2009. The latter permit various in-vivo models and endpoints for phase II studies, e.g., AIT-induced changes in skin test, nasal, conjunctival or bronchial provocation, or in exposure chamber or field trials. Selection and graduation of the doses, minimization of placebo effects, and sufficient numbers of patients are a challenge. Effort, required time, and costs are important variables for the initiators of phase II trials. Risks are characterized by e.g., a) too small doses without relevant differences compared to placebo, b) missing true dose-response relationships, c) strong placebo effect and consequently small “therapeutic window”, d) large heterogeneity and missing distinct differences (compared to placebo), e) too small effects in field studies due to low allergen exposure, f) missing dose-related increase (in case of too high doses). In the view of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, the unambiguous phase II trials with TAV products performed until today were not able to confirm the marketed doses for AIT. Regardless of the utilized model, more raw and single data should illustrate the individual outcome of AIT during phase II trials, facilitating an improved and more intuitive interpretation of the data (placebo effects? scattering?). In the medium term, evidence regarding AIT efficacy will considerably increase due to phase II trials as a prerequisite for subsequent phase III field studies. This affects all manufacturers offering AIT products in Germany and Europe. Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2019-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7066681/ /pubmed/32176223 http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX02033E Text en © Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kleine-Tebbe, J.
Kaul, S.
Mösges, R.
Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding
title Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding
title_full Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding
title_fullStr Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding
title_full_unstemmed Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding
title_short Allergen immunotherapy phase II trials: Challenges in dose finding
title_sort allergen immunotherapy phase ii trials: challenges in dose finding
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176223
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALX02033E
work_keys_str_mv AT kleinetebbej allergenimmunotherapyphaseiitrialschallengesindosefinding
AT kauls allergenimmunotherapyphaseiitrialschallengesindosefinding
AT mosgesr allergenimmunotherapyphaseiitrialschallengesindosefinding