Cargando…
Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin
BACKGROUND: Because cisplatin (CDDP) decreases upon light exposure, it is necessary to prevent such exposure during administration. However, the shielding conditions employed are not uniform. Therefore, in this study, we examined the shielding effects of four shading covers, which are commonly used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-020-00163-x |
_version_ | 1783505307054374912 |
---|---|
author | Abe, Tomoya Matsumoto, Daigo Nakayama, Toshiaki Shimazaki, Yukinari Sagara, Atsunobu Kanehira, Dan Azechi, Takuya Sato, Fumiaki Sakai, Hiroyasu Yumoto, Tetsuro Kamei, Junzo |
author_facet | Abe, Tomoya Matsumoto, Daigo Nakayama, Toshiaki Shimazaki, Yukinari Sagara, Atsunobu Kanehira, Dan Azechi, Takuya Sato, Fumiaki Sakai, Hiroyasu Yumoto, Tetsuro Kamei, Junzo |
author_sort | Abe, Tomoya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Because cisplatin (CDDP) decreases upon light exposure, it is necessary to prevent such exposure during administration. However, the shielding conditions employed are not uniform. Therefore, in this study, we examined the shielding effects of four shading covers, which are commonly used to ensure the stability of CDDP in clinical settings. METHODS: Four shielding conditions, along with a control, were tested under a 1000-Lux white fluorescent lamp at room temperature: aluminum foil (Al), brown shading cover (BSC), yellow shading cover (YSC), milky-white anti-exposure cover (MAC), and no shading cover (NSC). Under each shielding condition, the relationship between the wavelength and transmittance was monitored in the range of 200–800 nm. CDDP was diluted to three concentration levels: 50, 100, and 250 μg/mL. Furthermore, the amount of remaining CDDP and the pH in the solutions were measured for 120 h. RESULTS: We found that BSC, YSC, and MAC conditions allowed various levels of transmittance; however, Al could not completely transmit light at all wavelengths. Moreover, we showed that the CDDP decreased under MAC and NSC conditions in a time-dependent manner, whereas this decrease was prevented under Al, BSC, and YSC conditions till 120 h. We also demonstrated increases in pH under MAC and NSC conditions in a time-dependent manner, which was prevented under Al, BSC, and YSC conditions till 120 h. Similar results were observed for all three CDDP concentration levels. The results also indicated the approximate relationship between the amount of remaining CDDP and the pH increase. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the opacity of each cover, our results suggest that BSC and YSC are useful and effective for minimizing CDDP degradation in clinical settings. Our results also indicate the alternatives for preparing, storing, and administering CDDP in clinical facilities, making the treatment schedule more flexible. Cumulatively, these findings indicate that the use of the appropriate shading covers, such as BSC or YSC, prevents the decrease in CDDP under fluorescent lighting, potentially contributing to achieving its full therapeutic effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7066770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70667702020-04-03 Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin Abe, Tomoya Matsumoto, Daigo Nakayama, Toshiaki Shimazaki, Yukinari Sagara, Atsunobu Kanehira, Dan Azechi, Takuya Sato, Fumiaki Sakai, Hiroyasu Yumoto, Tetsuro Kamei, Junzo J Pharm Health Care Sci Short Report BACKGROUND: Because cisplatin (CDDP) decreases upon light exposure, it is necessary to prevent such exposure during administration. However, the shielding conditions employed are not uniform. Therefore, in this study, we examined the shielding effects of four shading covers, which are commonly used to ensure the stability of CDDP in clinical settings. METHODS: Four shielding conditions, along with a control, were tested under a 1000-Lux white fluorescent lamp at room temperature: aluminum foil (Al), brown shading cover (BSC), yellow shading cover (YSC), milky-white anti-exposure cover (MAC), and no shading cover (NSC). Under each shielding condition, the relationship between the wavelength and transmittance was monitored in the range of 200–800 nm. CDDP was diluted to three concentration levels: 50, 100, and 250 μg/mL. Furthermore, the amount of remaining CDDP and the pH in the solutions were measured for 120 h. RESULTS: We found that BSC, YSC, and MAC conditions allowed various levels of transmittance; however, Al could not completely transmit light at all wavelengths. Moreover, we showed that the CDDP decreased under MAC and NSC conditions in a time-dependent manner, whereas this decrease was prevented under Al, BSC, and YSC conditions till 120 h. We also demonstrated increases in pH under MAC and NSC conditions in a time-dependent manner, which was prevented under Al, BSC, and YSC conditions till 120 h. Similar results were observed for all three CDDP concentration levels. The results also indicated the approximate relationship between the amount of remaining CDDP and the pH increase. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the opacity of each cover, our results suggest that BSC and YSC are useful and effective for minimizing CDDP degradation in clinical settings. Our results also indicate the alternatives for preparing, storing, and administering CDDP in clinical facilities, making the treatment schedule more flexible. Cumulatively, these findings indicate that the use of the appropriate shading covers, such as BSC or YSC, prevents the decrease in CDDP under fluorescent lighting, potentially contributing to achieving its full therapeutic effect. BioMed Central 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7066770/ /pubmed/32257365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-020-00163-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Abe, Tomoya Matsumoto, Daigo Nakayama, Toshiaki Shimazaki, Yukinari Sagara, Atsunobu Kanehira, Dan Azechi, Takuya Sato, Fumiaki Sakai, Hiroyasu Yumoto, Tetsuro Kamei, Junzo Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin |
title | Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin |
title_full | Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin |
title_fullStr | Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin |
title_short | Effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of Cisplatin |
title_sort | effect of different shielding conditions on the stability of cisplatin |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7066770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32257365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-020-00163-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abetomoya effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT matsumotodaigo effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT nakayamatoshiaki effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT shimazakiyukinari effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT sagaraatsunobu effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT kanehiradan effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT azechitakuya effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT satofumiaki effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT sakaihiroyasu effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT yumototetsuro effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin AT kameijunzo effectofdifferentshieldingconditionsonthestabilityofcisplatin |