Cargando…

Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Several anti-D immunoglobulin strategies exist for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This study systematically assessed the clinical value of those therapeutic strategies. METHODS: The Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Xiaohui, Fu, Qiurong, Bao, Ziwei, Zhang, Yi, Zhou, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230073
_version_ 1783505394734202880
author Xie, Xiaohui
Fu, Qiurong
Bao, Ziwei
Zhang, Yi
Zhou, Dan
author_facet Xie, Xiaohui
Fu, Qiurong
Bao, Ziwei
Zhang, Yi
Zhou, Dan
author_sort Xie, Xiaohui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several anti-D immunoglobulin strategies exist for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This study systematically assessed the clinical value of those therapeutic strategies. METHODS: The Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were searched for eligible studies that evaluated the value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies in preventing maternal anti-D antibody sensitization. Combined odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 14.2 and WinBUGS 1.4.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-four original studies involving 64860 patients were included. Among all therapeutic measures, injecting 300 μg anti-D immunoglobulin at 28 and 34 gestational weeks (antenatal 5/E) appeared to be the most effective measure for preventing maternal antibody sensitization (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 96.8%), while a single injection at 28 gestational weeks (SUCRA = 89.2%) was the second most effective. Administering no injection or a placebo (SUCRA = 0.0%) was the least effective intervention measure. CONCLUSION: Among the therapeutic measures, antenatal 5/E appeared to be the best method for reducing the positive incidence of anti-D antibodies in the maternal serum; thus, it may be the most effective treatment for preventing fetal hemolytic disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7067404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70674042020-03-23 Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis Xie, Xiaohui Fu, Qiurong Bao, Ziwei Zhang, Yi Zhou, Dan PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Several anti-D immunoglobulin strategies exist for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. This study systematically assessed the clinical value of those therapeutic strategies. METHODS: The Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were searched for eligible studies that evaluated the value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies in preventing maternal anti-D antibody sensitization. Combined odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 14.2 and WinBUGS 1.4.3 software. RESULTS: Twenty-four original studies involving 64860 patients were included. Among all therapeutic measures, injecting 300 μg anti-D immunoglobulin at 28 and 34 gestational weeks (antenatal 5/E) appeared to be the most effective measure for preventing maternal antibody sensitization (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 96.8%), while a single injection at 28 gestational weeks (SUCRA = 89.2%) was the second most effective. Administering no injection or a placebo (SUCRA = 0.0%) was the least effective intervention measure. CONCLUSION: Among the therapeutic measures, antenatal 5/E appeared to be the best method for reducing the positive incidence of anti-D antibodies in the maternal serum; thus, it may be the most effective treatment for preventing fetal hemolytic disease. Public Library of Science 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7067404/ /pubmed/32163467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230073 Text en © 2020 Xie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xie, Xiaohui
Fu, Qiurong
Bao, Ziwei
Zhang, Yi
Zhou, Dan
Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis
title Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis
title_full Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis
title_short Clinical value of different anti-D immunoglobulin strategies for preventing Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: A network meta-analysis
title_sort clinical value of different anti-d immunoglobulin strategies for preventing rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: a network meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230073
work_keys_str_mv AT xiexiaohui clinicalvalueofdifferentantidimmunoglobulinstrategiesforpreventingrhhemolyticdiseaseofthefetusandnewbornanetworkmetaanalysis
AT fuqiurong clinicalvalueofdifferentantidimmunoglobulinstrategiesforpreventingrhhemolyticdiseaseofthefetusandnewbornanetworkmetaanalysis
AT baoziwei clinicalvalueofdifferentantidimmunoglobulinstrategiesforpreventingrhhemolyticdiseaseofthefetusandnewbornanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangyi clinicalvalueofdifferentantidimmunoglobulinstrategiesforpreventingrhhemolyticdiseaseofthefetusandnewbornanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhoudan clinicalvalueofdifferentantidimmunoglobulinstrategiesforpreventingrhhemolyticdiseaseofthefetusandnewbornanetworkmetaanalysis