Cargando…

Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?

The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is being increasingly applied in various environments. Although eDNA undergoes rapid degradation in aqueous environments, it has been detected in streams up to 10 km downstream from its source. As environmental bacteria can uptake free DNA, transfer their genetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nukazawa, Kei, Akahoshi, Kentaro, Suzuki, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230174
_version_ 1783505411794534400
author Nukazawa, Kei
Akahoshi, Kentaro
Suzuki, Yoshihiro
author_facet Nukazawa, Kei
Akahoshi, Kentaro
Suzuki, Yoshihiro
author_sort Nukazawa, Kei
collection PubMed
description The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is being increasingly applied in various environments. Although eDNA undergoes rapid degradation in aqueous environments, it has been detected in streams up to 10 km downstream from its source. As environmental bacteria can uptake free DNA, transfer their genetic traits, and amplify, there is a potential risk that they, rather than a target aquatic species, could become a source of measured eDNA. This study examined whether bacteria with incorporated fish DNA could be such a source by investigating the detectability of fish DNA generated by bacteria inhabiting river water and riverbed sediment. We attempted to detect common carp (Cyprinus carpio) eDNA in stream water and sediment samples and the DNA of common carp produced by bacterial colonies (Escherichia coli, total coliform, and heterotrophic bacteria) cultured from the samples. The eDNA was detected in the environmental samples but the carp DNA from the targeted bacteria was rarely detected in both water and riverbed sediment samples. Our results suggest that the risk of bacterium-induced false positive detection for fish eDNA is negligible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7067479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70674792020-03-23 Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? Nukazawa, Kei Akahoshi, Kentaro Suzuki, Yoshihiro PLoS One Research Article The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is being increasingly applied in various environments. Although eDNA undergoes rapid degradation in aqueous environments, it has been detected in streams up to 10 km downstream from its source. As environmental bacteria can uptake free DNA, transfer their genetic traits, and amplify, there is a potential risk that they, rather than a target aquatic species, could become a source of measured eDNA. This study examined whether bacteria with incorporated fish DNA could be such a source by investigating the detectability of fish DNA generated by bacteria inhabiting river water and riverbed sediment. We attempted to detect common carp (Cyprinus carpio) eDNA in stream water and sediment samples and the DNA of common carp produced by bacterial colonies (Escherichia coli, total coliform, and heterotrophic bacteria) cultured from the samples. The eDNA was detected in the environmental samples but the carp DNA from the targeted bacteria was rarely detected in both water and riverbed sediment samples. Our results suggest that the risk of bacterium-induced false positive detection for fish eDNA is negligible. Public Library of Science 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7067479/ /pubmed/32163471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230174 Text en © 2020 Nukazawa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nukazawa, Kei
Akahoshi, Kentaro
Suzuki, Yoshihiro
Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?
title Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?
title_full Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?
title_fullStr Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?
title_full_unstemmed Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?
title_short Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?
title_sort are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental dna?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230174
work_keys_str_mv AT nukazawakei arebacteriapotentialsourcesoffishenvironmentaldna
AT akahoshikentaro arebacteriapotentialsourcesoffishenvironmentaldna
AT suzukiyoshihiro arebacteriapotentialsourcesoffishenvironmentaldna