Cargando…
Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA?
The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is being increasingly applied in various environments. Although eDNA undergoes rapid degradation in aqueous environments, it has been detected in streams up to 10 km downstream from its source. As environmental bacteria can uptake free DNA, transfer their genetic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230174 |
_version_ | 1783505411794534400 |
---|---|
author | Nukazawa, Kei Akahoshi, Kentaro Suzuki, Yoshihiro |
author_facet | Nukazawa, Kei Akahoshi, Kentaro Suzuki, Yoshihiro |
author_sort | Nukazawa, Kei |
collection | PubMed |
description | The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is being increasingly applied in various environments. Although eDNA undergoes rapid degradation in aqueous environments, it has been detected in streams up to 10 km downstream from its source. As environmental bacteria can uptake free DNA, transfer their genetic traits, and amplify, there is a potential risk that they, rather than a target aquatic species, could become a source of measured eDNA. This study examined whether bacteria with incorporated fish DNA could be such a source by investigating the detectability of fish DNA generated by bacteria inhabiting river water and riverbed sediment. We attempted to detect common carp (Cyprinus carpio) eDNA in stream water and sediment samples and the DNA of common carp produced by bacterial colonies (Escherichia coli, total coliform, and heterotrophic bacteria) cultured from the samples. The eDNA was detected in the environmental samples but the carp DNA from the targeted bacteria was rarely detected in both water and riverbed sediment samples. Our results suggest that the risk of bacterium-induced false positive detection for fish eDNA is negligible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7067479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70674792020-03-23 Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? Nukazawa, Kei Akahoshi, Kentaro Suzuki, Yoshihiro PLoS One Research Article The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is being increasingly applied in various environments. Although eDNA undergoes rapid degradation in aqueous environments, it has been detected in streams up to 10 km downstream from its source. As environmental bacteria can uptake free DNA, transfer their genetic traits, and amplify, there is a potential risk that they, rather than a target aquatic species, could become a source of measured eDNA. This study examined whether bacteria with incorporated fish DNA could be such a source by investigating the detectability of fish DNA generated by bacteria inhabiting river water and riverbed sediment. We attempted to detect common carp (Cyprinus carpio) eDNA in stream water and sediment samples and the DNA of common carp produced by bacterial colonies (Escherichia coli, total coliform, and heterotrophic bacteria) cultured from the samples. The eDNA was detected in the environmental samples but the carp DNA from the targeted bacteria was rarely detected in both water and riverbed sediment samples. Our results suggest that the risk of bacterium-induced false positive detection for fish eDNA is negligible. Public Library of Science 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7067479/ /pubmed/32163471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230174 Text en © 2020 Nukazawa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nukazawa, Kei Akahoshi, Kentaro Suzuki, Yoshihiro Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? |
title | Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? |
title_full | Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? |
title_fullStr | Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? |
title_short | Are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental DNA? |
title_sort | are bacteria potential sources of fish environmental dna? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7067479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32163471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nukazawakei arebacteriapotentialsourcesoffishenvironmentaldna AT akahoshikentaro arebacteriapotentialsourcesoffishenvironmentaldna AT suzukiyoshihiro arebacteriapotentialsourcesoffishenvironmentaldna |